Burger v. United States, 510 U.S. 1134 (1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Burger v. United States, 510 U.S. 1134 (1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Marvin Lovejoy v. United States (ca6, 1996-06-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Marvin Lovejoy v. United States
6th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ritchie v. Eberhart, 11 F.3d 587, 591-92 (6th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 1111 (1994).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. George Dean, James Earl Cofer, Kenneth Dewayne Smith, and Kenneth Earl Flowers
5th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Guerrero, 5 F.3d 868, 871 (5th Cir.1993) (“Questions of fact ‘capable of resolution by the district court upon proper objection at sentencing can never constitute plain error.’ ” (quoting United States v. Lopez, 923 F.2d 47, 50 (5th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 924 , 111 S.Ct. 2032 , 114 L.Ed.2d 117 (1991))), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1111 , 127 L.Ed.2d 422 (1994).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Wisting R. Fierro, Olga L. Martinez, Jaime Ibanez A/K/A Ibania, Jesus A. Serna, Jose J. Grajales, Cross-Appellee
5th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Guerrero, 5 F.3d 868, 871 (5th Cir.1993) (holding that "questions of fact capable of resolution by the district court upon proper objection at sentencing can never constitute plain error.”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1111 , 127 L.Ed.2d 422 (1994).
cited Cited "see" Barry W. Ritchie v. Don Eberhart
6th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See 114 S.Ct. 1111 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Matos-Rodriguez
11th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
See id. at 836-38; see also United States v. Guerrero, 5 F.3d 868, 873 (5th Cir. 1993) (“If armed burglars encounter the occupants of a home or law enforcement officials, it makes little difference how the burglars obtained their firearms.”), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1134 , 114 S.Ct. 1111 , 17 127 L.Ed.2d 422 (1994).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Matos-Rodriguez
11th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
See id. at 836-38; see also United States v. Guerrero, 5 F.3d 868, 873 (5th Cir.1993) (“If armed burglars encounter the occupants of a home or law enforcement officials, it makes little difference how the burglars obtained their firearms.”), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1134 , 114 S.Ct. 1111 , 127 L.Ed.2d 422 (1994).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Whitfield
11th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
See United States v. Fadipe, 43 F.3d 993 (5th Cir.1995) (enhancement on federal gun charge improper where gun was present in car filled with documents used by defendant in felony bank fraud; the "presence of a gun near instruments of bank fraud does not create the same automatic increase in danger of physical violence that exists when drugs and guns are present together”); see also United States v. Guerrero, 5 F.3d 868, 872-73 (5th Cir.1993) (opining that under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1), the government "may meet its burden by showing that the weapon facilitated, or could have facilitated, the …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Burger
v.
United States
93-7358.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1994.
510 U.S. 1134
Published

510 U.S. 1134

Burger
v.
United States.

No. 93-7358.

Supreme Court of United States.

February 22, 1994.

1

Appeal from the C. A. 3d Cir.

2

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 6 F. 3d 780.