United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc., 510 U.S. 1163 (1994). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc., 510 U.S. 1163 (1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 2 distinct cases · “When material new matters are brought out on redirect examination, the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment mandates that the opposing party be given the right of recross-examination on those new matters.”
79 citation events (26 in the last 25 years) across 25 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Payne (ca6, 2006-02-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
examined Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Payne
6th Cir. · 2006 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
when material new matters are brought out on redirect examination, the confrontation clause of the sixth amendment mandates that the opposing party be given the right of recross-examination on those new matters.
discussed Cited "see" Donald Dwayne Whatley v. State of Alabama.
Ala. Crim. App. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Dandy, 998 F.2d 1344 (6th Cir.1993), cert, denied, 510 U.S. 1163 , 114 S.Ct. 1188 , 127 L.Ed.2d 538 (1994). “ ‘First, judicial intervention may be necessary for clarification in a lengthy and complex trial.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Bobby Marshall Zidell (2×)
6th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Dandy, 998 F.2d 1344, 1356-57 (6th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1163 , 114 S.Ct. 1188 , 127 L.Ed.2d 538 (1994).
cited Cited "see" Vrocher v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Dandy , 998 F.2d 1344 (6th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1163 (1994). "`First, judicial intervention may be necessary for clarification in a lengthy and complex trial.
cited Cited "see" Smith v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Dandy, 998 F.2d 1344 (6th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1163 , 114 S.Ct. 1188 , 127 L.Ed.2d 538 (1994).
discussed Cited "see" Reich v. John Alden
1st Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See, ___ e.g., Reich v. New York, 3 F.3d 581, 587-89 (2d Cir. 1993), cert. ____ _____ ________ _____ denied, 510 U.S. 1163 (1994) (police investigators conduct or ______ "produce" criminal investigations); Dalheim, 918 F.2d at 1230 -31 _______ (television station's producers, directors, and assignment editors "produced" newscasts, and were thus non-exempt).
cited Cited "see" Cooke v. General Dynamics Corp.
D. Conn. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Reich v. State of New York, 3 F.3d 581, 587 (2d Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1163 , 114 S.Ct. 1187 , 127 L.Ed.2d 537 (1994).
cited Cited "see" Gens v. Resolution
1st Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See RTC v. Feldman, 3 F.3d 5, 9 (1st Cir. 1993) ___ ___ _______ (appellate court may affirm on any ground supported by record), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1163 (1994).
cited Cited "see" Gens v. Resolution Trust Corp.
1st Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See RTC v. Feldman, 3 F.3d 5, 9 (1st Cir.1993) (appellate court may affirm on any ground supported by record), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1163 , 114 S.Ct. 1187 , 127 L.Ed.2d 537 (1994).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Baker v. Stone County, Mo.
W.D. Mo. · 1999 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Reich v. State of New York, 3 F.3d 581, 586 (2d Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1163 , 114 S.Ct. 1187 , 127 L.Ed.2d 537 (1994); Nichols, 921 F.2d at 1103 . 4 The personal staff exception is a question of federal law, with state law only relevant as it defines the plaintiffs position and duties.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. The State Of Vermont Agency Of Natural Resources
2d Cir. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Reich v. New York, 3 F.3d 581, 589-90 (2d Cir.1993) (requirement that state pay overtime to state law enforcement officials under the Fair Labor Standards Act did not so alter the federal-state balance as to require a clear statement), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1163 , 114 S.Ct. 1187 , 127 L.Ed.2d 537 (1994), overruled by implication on other grounds by Seminole Tribe v. Florida, 517 U.S. at 59-66 , 116 S.Ct. 1114 . 49 In the FCA, we see no alteration of "the usual constitutional balance of federal and state powers" such as to require application of the plain statement rule.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States ex rel. Stevens v. Vermont Agency of Natural Resources
2d Cir. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Reich v. New York, 3 F.3d 581, 589-90 (2d Cir.1993) (requirement that state pay overtime to state law enforcement officials under the Fair Labor Standards Act did not so alter the federal-state balance as to require a clear statement), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1163 , 114 S.Ct. 1187 , 127 L.Ed.2d 537 (1994), overruled by implication on other grounds by Seminole Tribe v. Florida, 517 U.S. at 59-66 , 116 S.Ct. 1114 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Reich v. John Alden Life Insurance
1st Cir. · 1997 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Reich v. New York, 3 F.3d 581, 587-89 (2d Cir.1993), ce rt. denied, 510 U.S. 1163 , 114 S.Ct. 1187 , 127 L.Ed.2d 537 (1994) (police investigators conduct or “produce” criminal investigations); Dalheim, 918 F.2d at 1230-31 (television station’s producers, directors, and assignment editors “produced” newscasts, and were thus non-exempt).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Dambreville v. City of Boston
D. Mass. · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Reich v. State of New York, 3 F.3d 581 , 586 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1163 , 114 S.Ct. 1187 , 127 L.Ed.2d 537 (1994); Nichols v. Hurley, 921 F.2d 1101, 1103 (10 Cir., 1990).
United States
v.
X-Citement Video, Inc., Et Al.
93-723.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 28, 1994.
510 U.S. 1163
Cited by 9 opinions  |  Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 92%
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (1) · Sixth Circuit (1)

C. A. 9th Cir. Motions of National Law Center for Children and Families et al. and National Family Legal Foundation et al. for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari granted.