green
Positive treatment
4.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Cooke v. General Dynamics Corp.
See Reich v. State of New York, 3 F.3d 581, 587 (2d Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1163 , 114 S.Ct. 1187 , 127 L.Ed.2d 537 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Gens v. Resolution Trust Corp.
See RTC v. Feldman, 3 F.3d 5, 9 (1st Cir.1993) (appellate court may affirm on any ground supported by record), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1163 , 114 S.Ct. 1187 , 127 L.Ed.2d 537 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lavian v. Haghnazari
HAGH further argues that even if the plaintiff were entitled to protection under the FLSA, much of the relief he requests would be barred by the statute of limitations. 7 Section 18(a)(1) of the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. § 213 (a)(1), exempts from the minimum wage and maximum hours provisions of the Act workers “employed in a bona fide executive, administrative, or professional capacity,” as those terms are “defined and delimited from time to time by regulations of the Secretary.” 29 U.S.C. § 213 (a)(1); see Reich v. State of New York, 3 F.3d 581, 587 (2d Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 11…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lot 5, Fox Grove
See Reich v. New York, 3 F.3d 581, 589-90 (2d Cir.1993) (refusing to interpret Gregory to resurrect undue deference to State’s political decisions), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1187 , 127 L.Ed.2d 537 (1994); EEOC v. Massachusetts, 987 F.2d 64, 69 (1st Cir.1993) (Gregory made “unequivocally clear ... the narrowness of its holding”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lot 5, Fox Grove, Alachua County, Florida
See Reich v. New York, 3 F.3d 581, 589-90 (2d Cir.1993) (refusing to interpret Gregory to resurrect undue deference to State's political decisions), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 1187 , 127 L.Ed.2d 537 (1994); EEOC v. Massachusetts, 987 F.2d 64, 69 (1st Cir.1993) (Gregory made "unequivocally clear ... the narrowness of its holding").
discussed
Cited "see"
Reich v. Chicago Title Insurance
(2×)
See Reich v. New York, 3 F.3d 581, 589 (2d Cir.1993) (police investigators), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1187 , 127 L.Ed.2d 537 (1994); Cooper Elec., 940 F.2d at 903-04 (inside salespersons); Dalheim v. KDFW-TV, 918 F.2d 1220, 1230 (5th Cir.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
First Gibraltar Bank, Fsb, and Beneficial Texas, Inc. v. Dan Morales, Atty. General, as Attorney General for the State of Texas
See Reich v. New York, 3 F.3d 581, 589-90 (2d Cir.1993) (holding that a federal requirement that states pay overtime to their police officers did not “strike at the heart of representative government” (internal quotations omitted)), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1187 , — L.Ed.2d - (1994); Gately v. Massachusetts, 2 F.3d 1221, 1230 (1st Cir.1993) (holding that Gregory’s plain statement rule did not apply to state mandatory retirement laws pertaining to police officers).
discussed
Cited "see"
First Gibraltar Bnk v. Morales
See Reich v. New York, 3 F.3d 581, 589-90 (2d Cir.1993) (holding that a federal requirement that states pay overtime to their police officers did not "strike at the heart of representative government" (internal quotations omitted)), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 1187 , --- L.Ed.2d ---- (1994); Gately v. Massachusetts, 2 F.3d 1221, 1230 (1st Cir.1993) (holding that Gregory's plain statement rule did not apply to state mandatory retirement laws pertaining to police officers).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baker v. Stone County, Mo.
See, e.g., Reich v. State of New York, 3 F.3d 581, 586 (2d Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1163 , 114 S.Ct. 1187 , 127 L.Ed.2d 537 (1994); Nichols, 921 F.2d at 1103 . 4 The personal staff exception is a question of federal law, with state law only relevant as it defines the plaintiffs position and duties.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. The State Of Vermont Agency Of Natural Resources
See also Reich v. New York, 3 F.3d 581, 589-90 (2d Cir.1993) (requirement that state pay overtime to state law enforcement officials under the Fair Labor Standards Act did not so alter the federal-state balance as to require a clear statement), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1163 , 114 S.Ct. 1187 , 127 L.Ed.2d 537 (1994), overruled by implication on other grounds by Seminole Tribe v. Florida, 517 U.S. at 59-66 , 116 S.Ct. 1114 . 49 In the FCA, we see no alteration of "the usual constitutional balance of federal and state powers" such as to require application of the plain statement rule.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States ex rel. Stevens v. Vermont Agency of Natural Resources
See also Reich v. New York, 3 F.3d 581, 589-90 (2d Cir.1993) (requirement that state pay overtime to state law enforcement officials under the Fair Labor Standards Act did not so alter the federal-state balance as to require a clear statement), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1163 , 114 S.Ct. 1187 , 127 L.Ed.2d 537 (1994), overruled by implication on other grounds by Seminole Tribe v. Florida, 517 U.S. at 59-66 , 116 S.Ct. 1114 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Reich v. John Alden Life Insurance
See, e.g., Reich v. New York, 3 F.3d 581, 587-89 (2d Cir.1993), ce rt. denied, 510 U.S. 1163 , 114 S.Ct. 1187 , 127 L.Ed.2d 537 (1994) (police investigators conduct or “produce” criminal investigations); Dalheim, 918 F.2d at 1230-31 (television station’s producers, directors, and assignment editors “produced” newscasts, and were thus non-exempt).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Dambreville v. City of Boston
See, e.g., Reich v. State of New York, 3 F.3d 581 , 586 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1163 , 114 S.Ct. 1187 , 127 L.Ed.2d 537 (1994); Nichols v. Hurley, 921 F.2d 1101, 1103 (10 Cir., 1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Provizer et ux.
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. 93-878.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 28, 1994.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.