green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.1 score
“corporation is not required to disclose a fact merely because a reasonable investor would very must like to know that fact. rather, an omission is actionable under the securities laws only when the corporation is subject to a duty to disclose the omitted facts.”
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Gershon v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
corporation is not required to disclose a fact merely because a reasonable investor would very must like to know that fact. rather, an omission is actionable under the securities laws only when the corporation is subject to a duty to disclose the omitted facts.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Leslie Fay Companies, Inc.
we have recognized two distinct ways in which a plaintiff may plead scienter without direct knowledge of the defendant's state of mind____ the second approach is to allege facts constituting circumstantial evidence of either recklessness or conscious behavior.
discussed
Cited "see"
Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. v. J.E.M. AG Supply, Inc.
See Arkansas Peace Center v. Dep’t of Pollution Control, 992 F.2d 145 , 147 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1017 , 114 S.Ct. 1397 , 128 L.Ed.2d 70 (1994); Wisconsin Gas Co. v. F.E.R.C., 758 F.2d 669 , 673-74 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1114 , 106 S.Ct. 1968 , 1969, 90 L.Ed.2d 653 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Allison v. Brooktree Corp.
See In re Time Warner Inc. Securities Litig., 9 F.3d 259, 269 (2nd Cir.1993), cert. denied sub nom., 511 U.S. 1017 , 114 S.Ct. 1397 , 128 L.Ed.2d 70 (1994). a.
discussed
Cited "see"
Iowa Utilities Board v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, the Southern New England Telephone Company v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, Bell Atlantic Corporation Bellsouth Corporation Pacific Telesis Group v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, Ameritech Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, Us West, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, Gte Service Corporation Gte Alaska, Incorporated Gte Arkansas, Incorporated Gte California, Incorporated Gte Florida, Incorporated Gte Midwest, Incorporated Gte South, Incorporated Gte Southwest, Incorporated Gte North, Incorporated Gte Northwest, Incorporated Gte Hawaiian Telephone Company, Incorporated Gte West Coast, Incorporated Contel of California, Inc. Contel of Minnesota, Inc. Contel of the South, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, New York Telephone Company New England Telephone and Telegraph Company v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, Cincinnati Bell Telephone Company v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, People of the State of New York the Public Service Commission of the State of New York v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, Sbc Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, Louisiana Public Service Commission v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, Florida Public Service Commission v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, South Dakota Public Utilities Commission v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, the People of the State of California the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, United States Telephone Association v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, Rural Telephone Coalition v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, Competitive Telecommunications Association v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, Mississippi Public Service Commission v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America
See Arkansas Peace Ctr. v. Dep't of Pollution Control, 992 F.2d 145 , 147 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1017 , 114 S.Ct. 1397 , 128 L.Ed.2d 70 (1994); Wisconsin Gas Co. v. F.E.R.C., 758 F.2d 669 , 673-74 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1114 , 106 S.Ct. 1968 , 1969, 90 L.Ed.2d 653 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Iowa Utilities Board v. Federal Communications Commission
See Arkansas Peace Ctr. v. Dep’t of Pollution Control, 992 F.2d 145 , 147 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1017 , 114 S.Ct. 1397 , 128 L.Ed.2d 70 (1994); Wisconsin Gas Co. v. F.E.R.C., 758 F.2d 669 , 673-74 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1114 , 106 S.Ct. 1968 , 1969, 90 L.Ed.2d 653 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
See In re Time Warner Inc. Securities Litigation, 9 F.3d 259, 264 (2d Cir.1993) (citing Bloor v. Carro, Spanbock, Londin, Rodman & Fass, 754 F.2d 57, 61 (2d Cir.1985)), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 1397 , 128 L.Ed.2d 70 (1994). 29 I.
discussed
Cited "see"
San Leandro Emergency Medical Group Profit Sharing Plan v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.
See In re Time Warner Inc. Securities Litigation, 9 F.3d 259, 264 (2d Cir.1993) (citing Bloor v. Carro, Spanbock, Londin, Rodman & Foss, 754 F.2d 57, 61 (2d Cir.1985)), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1397 , 128 L.Ed.2d 70 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Greenwich Township v. Murtagh
See Murtagh v. County of Berks, 535 Pa. 50 , 634 A.2d 179 (1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1397 , 128 L.Ed.2d 71 (1994). .
discussed
Cited "see"
McClellan Ecological Seepage Situation v. Perry
See Arkansas Peace Ctr. v. Department of Pollution Control, 999 F.2d 1212 , 1217 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1397 , 128 L.Ed.2d 70 (1994) (holding that section 113(h) bars a challenge based upon RCRA); North Shore Gas, 930 F.2d at 1244 (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
McClellan Ecological Seepage Situation Mary Fisher Charles Yarbrough v. William J. Perry, Secretary of the United States Department of Defense, McClellan Ecological Seepage Situation Mary Fisher Charles Yarbrough v. William J. Perry, Secretary of the United States Department of Defense
See Arkansas Peace Ctr. v. Department of Pollution Control, 999 F.2d 1212 , 1217 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 1397 , 128 L.Ed.2d 70 (1994) (holding that section 113(h) bars a challenge based upon RCRA); North Shore Gas, 930 F.2d at 1244 (same). 17 MESS alternatively contends that Section 113(h) withdraws federal jurisdiction only for challenges brought by potentially responsible parties, and does not affect actions brought under the citizen suit provisions of environmental statutes.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Princeton Gamma-Tech, Inc.
See Arkansas Peace Ctr. v. Arkansas Dep't of Pollution Control & Ecology, 999 F.2d 1212 , 1216-17 (8th Cir.1993) (discussing cases), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 1397 , 128 L.Ed.2d 70 (1994); North Shore Gas Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency, 930 F.2d 1239, 1244-45 (7th Cir.1991); Schalk v. Reilly, 900 F.2d 1091, 1095 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 981 , 111 S.Ct. 509 , 112 L.Ed.2d 521 (1990); State of Alabama v. United States Envtl.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Synergen, Inc. Securities Litigation
See In re Time Warner, Inc. Securities Litigation, 9 F.3d 259, 267 (2d Cir. 1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1397 , 128 L.Ed.2d 70 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Princeton Gamma-Tech, Inc.
(2×)
See Arkansas Peace Ctr. v. Arkansas Dep’t of Pollution Control & Ecology, 999 F.2d 1212 , 1216-17 (8th Cir.1993) (discussing cases), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1397 , 128 L.Ed.2d 70 (1994); North Shore Gas Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency, 930 F.2d 1239, 1244-45 (7th Cir.1991); Schalk v. Reilly, 900 F.2d 1091, 1095 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 981 , 111 S.Ct. 509 , 112 L.Ed.2d 521 (1990); State of Alabama v. United States Envtl.
discussed
Cited "see"
Private Truck Council of America, Inc. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission
(2×)
See, for example, Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc. v. Indiana Dept. of State Revenue, 583 N.E.2d 214 (Ind.Tax 1991) and Murtaugh v. County of Berks, 535 Pa. 50 , 634 A.2d 179 , cert. denied - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1397 , 128 L.Ed.2d 71 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sarah B. Shields, Individually and as Representative of All Others Similarly Situated v. Citytrust Bancorp, Inc., George F. Taylor and Irwin Engelman
See In re Time Warner Inc. Securities Litigation, 9 F.3d 259, 268-69 (2d Cir.1993), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1397 , 128 L.Ed.2d 70 (1994); Beck v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co., 820 F.2d 46, 50 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1005 , 108 S.Ct. 698 , 98 L.Ed.2d 650 (1988), overruled on other grounds by United States v. Indelicato, 865 F.2d 1370 (2d Cir.1989) (en banc).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Savoie v. Merchants Bank
See, e.g., In re Time Warner Inc. Securities Litigation, 9 F.3d 259, 261 (2d Cir.1993), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 1397 , 128 L.Ed.2d 70 (1994); Denny v. Barber, 576 F.2d 465, 467 (2d Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Savoie v. Merchants Bank
See, e.g., In re Time Warner Inc. Securities Litigation, 9 F.3d 259, 261 (2d Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1397 , 128 L.Ed.2d 70 (1994); Denny v. Barber, 576 F.2d 465, 467 (2d Cir.1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
County of Berks, Pennsylvania
v.
Murtagh
v.
Murtagh
No. 93-1278.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 4, 1994.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (2)
Sup. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.