green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
12.8 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 2 distinct cases, 2013–2019 ·
…the burden of establishing the propriety of disbursements from tribal funds rests with the government.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Western Shoshone Identifiable Group v. United States
(2×)
the burden of establishing the propriety of disbursements from tribal funds rests with the government.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jicarilla Apache Nation, Formerly Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. United States
(2×)
the burden of establishing the propriety of disbursements from tribal funds rests with the government.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Williamson v. Shalala
reasonable for courts to look to the body of law developed under title vii for guidance in enforcing comparable rights under the rehabilitation act
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Vizenor v. Babbitt
(2×)
under mitchell , 1202 then, no fiduciary duty arises absent comprehensive regulation of indian resources.
discussed
Cited "see"
Masayesva v. Hale
(2×)
See White Mountain Apache Tribe v. United States, 11 Cl.Ct. 614, 665-66 (1987) (qualifying Dr. Workman as “an expert in appraisal and range management” and characterizing his proposed measure of damages as “especially persuasive”), aff'd, 5 F.3d 1506 (Fed.Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1030 , 114 S.Ct. 1538 , 128 L.Ed.2d 191 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
47 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 524, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5385, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8731 Vernon Masayesva, Chairman of the Hopi Tribal Council of the Hopi Indian Tribe, for and on Behalf of the Hopi Indian Tribe v. Albert Hale, President of the Navajo Nation Navajo Nation, Ferrell Secakuku, Chairman of the Hopi Tribal Council of the Hopi Indian Tribe, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Albert Hale, President of the Navajo Nation Navajo Nation United States of America, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants. Ferrell Secakuku, Chairman of the Hopi Tribal Council of the Hopi Indian Tribe, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Albert Hale, President of the Navajo Nation Navajo Nation United States of America, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees
(2×)
See White Mountain Apache Tribe v. United States, 11 Cl.Ct. 614, 665-66 (1987) (qualifying Dr. Workman as "an expert in appraisal and range management" and characterizing his proposed measure of damages as "especially persuasive"), aff'd, 5 F.3d 1506 (Fed.Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1030 , 114 S.Ct. 1538 , 128 L.Ed.2d 191 (1994). 24 The district court thoughtfully examined the methodology and opinion of each expert, and accepted Dr. Workman's measure of damages only after making appropriate downward adjustments.
discussed
Cited "see"
Estate of Schwartz v. HBA MANAGEMENT
(2×)
See Krivanek v. Take Back Tampa Political Committee, 625 So.2d 840, 844 (Fla.1993), cert. denied sub nom., Clewis v. Krivanek, ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct. 1538 , 128 L.Ed.2d 191 (1994) (advisory ethical opinions are not binding precedent, although they may be considered by Florida courts as persuasive authority if they are well reasoned).
examined
Cited "see"
William G. Nordvik Claire N. Nordvik v. Commissioner Internal Revenue Service
(4×)
See Haley v. C.I.R., 805 F.Supp. 834 (E.D.Cal.1992), aff'd. without opinion, 5 F.3d 536 (1993), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 1538 , 128 L.Ed.2d 191 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Kathleen Borkowski v. Valley Central School District
See Barth v. Gelb, 2 F.3d 1180, 1186 (D.C.Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 1538 , 128 L.Ed.2d 190 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
David L. White v. York International Corporation
See Barth v. Gelb, 2 F.3d 1180, 1185-87 (D.C.Cir.1993), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1538 , 128 L.Ed.2d 190 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Martin v. Town of Palm Beach
(2×)
See Krivanek v. Take Back Tampa Political Committee, 625 So.2d 840, 842 (Fla. 1993) (defense of lack of standing can be waived), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct. 1538 , 128 L.Ed.2d 191 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
James Jimmie Mason v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General
See Barth v. Gelb, 2 F.3d 1180, 1188-89 (D.C.Cir.1993) (finding that the district court’s error in assigning the burden of proof under the Rehabilitation Act was harmless), cert. denied, —• U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1538 , 128 L.Ed.2d 190 (1994). 5 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Vorhies v. Pioneer Manufacturing Co.
See also Barth v. Gelb, 2 F.3d 1180, 1185-87 (D.C.Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1538 , 128 L.Ed.2d 190 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jurado-Rodriguez
See, e.g., United States v. All Funds on Deposit, 801 F.Supp. 984 (E.D.N.Y.1992), aff'd, 6 F.3d 37 (2d Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1294 , 127 L.Ed.2d 648 (1994) (Nos. 93-1002, 93-1018, 93-1019), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1295 , 127 L.Ed.2d 648 (1994) (Nos. 93-1061, 93-1073, 93-1020), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1538 , 128 L.Ed.2d 190 (1994) (No. 93-1054).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mary C. Dratz v. Glen D. Johnson, Speaker, Oklahoma House of Representatives, in His Official and Individual Capacities
See, e.g., Barth v. Gelb, 2 F.3d 1180, 1186 (D.C.Cir.1993)(noting that category two Rehabilitation Act cases "involve[ ] the sort of inquiry into subjective facts--the [employer's] true motivation--that the Burdine three-step approach was designed to address"), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 1538 (1994); Teahan v. Metro-North Commuter R.R., 951 F.2d 511, 514 (2d Cir.1991)(holding that McDonnell Douglas analysis is appropriate for Rehabilitation Act cases that fall into the second category), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 54 (1992); Prewitt v. United States Postal Serv., 662 F.2d 292 , 305 n. 19 (5th Cir.198…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hogue v. MQS Inspection, Inc.
See also Barth v. Gelb, 2 F.3d 1180, 1185-87 (D.C.Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 1538 , 128 L.Ed.2d 190 (1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
WHITE MOUNTAIN APACHE TRIBE OF ARIZONA
v.
UNITED STATES
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 93-1127.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 18, 1994.
Cited by 16 opinions | Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.