green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.2 score
“this court has held several times that irregularities in drug transactions which could cause a supplier to suspect police action and destroy evidence or prepare to defend a residence are sufficient to constitute exigent circumstances.”
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Raymond Bingham
this court has held several times that irregularities in drug transactions which could cause a supplier to suspect police action and destroy evidence or prepare to defend a residence are sufficient to constitute exigent circumstances.
discussed
Cited "see"
Whiting v. State
See United States v. Seals, 987 F.2d 1102 , 1107 n. 8 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 853 , 114 S.Ct. 155 , 126 L.Ed.2d 116 (1993)(interpreting Ross , stating that “if officers have probable cause to believe that contraband is in only one part of a car, then they are limited to that area.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lionel Ortiz
See United States v. Tarazon, 989 F.2d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir.), cert. denied , — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 155 , 126 L.Ed.2d 116 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Williams
See United States v. Seals, 987 F.2d 1102, 1107 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 155 , 126 L.Ed.2d 116 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Patterson
See United States v. Seals, 987 F.2d 1102, 1107 (5th Cir.) (canine alert to cocaine-residue, “in conjunction with the defendant’s nervousness and false answers, coupled with the modification of the rear seat, provided the officers with probable cause to believe that additional drugs were contained within the vehicle.”), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 155 , 126 *72 L.Ed.2d 116 (1993); United States v. Morales-Zamora, 914 F.2d 200, 205 (10th Cir.1990) (“probable cause to search was supplied when the dog alerted to the vehicles.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Teofilo Solorio, United States of America v. Bourne Bobby Thomas
See United States v. Tarazon, 989 F.2d 1045, 1051 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 155 (1993) (citing cases); see also United States v. Berry, 627 F.2d 193, 199 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1113 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gary Lee Roberson
See United States v. Tarazon, 989 F.2d 1045, 1053 (9th cir.) ("'[i]t may be reasonably inferred that an armed possessor of drugs has something more in mind than mere personal use"') (quotation omitted), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 155 (1993); Martinez, 967 F.2d at 1345 (intent to distribute may be inferred from the presence of packaging materials).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Garcia
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See State v. McKee, 181 Wis. 2d 354, 361-62 , 510 N.W.2d 807, 810 (Ct. App. 1993) (comparing heat-sensing devices to drug "sniffing dogs"). [5] See FitzGerald, supra note 3, at 81 (discussing uniformity of federal courts on canine "sniff" cases). [6] See also United States v. Seals, 987 F.2d 1102 , 1106 (5th Cir.) ("A dog `sniff is not a search.") cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 155 (1993); United States v. Morales-Zamora, 914 F.2d 200, 203-05 (10th Cir. 1990) (canine "sniff" of vehicle is not a search subject to Fourth Amendment scrutiny); United States v. Coyler, 878 F.2d 469, 474-76 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alfred Darnell Ford
See United States v. Tarazon, 989 F.2d 1045, 1049 (9th Cir.) (probable cause to arrest existed when informant arranged drug deal, defendant agreed to buy one-half kilogram of cocaine, defendant met with informant to negotiate price, and defendant showed cocaine to informant), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 155 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Willie F. Critton, Jr. (93-4391) Janet L. Livingston (93-4392) and Leslie E. Livingston (93-4393)
See United States v. Seals, 987 F.2d 1102 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 155 , 126 L.Ed.2d 116 (1993) (loaded rifle in trunk); United States v. Castro-Lara, 970 F.2d 976 (1st Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2935 , 124 L.Ed.2d 684 (1993) (unloaded handgun in briefcase in trunk); United States v. Travis, 993 F.2d 1316 (8th Cir.), cert. denied , — U.S. -, -, 114 S.Ct. 229 , 245, 126 L.Ed.2d 184 , 198 (1993) (firearms locked in glove compartment of ear defendant was driving).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Zucco
See United States v. Seals, 987 F.2d 1102, 1107 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 155 , 126 L.Ed.2d 116 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Zapata
See Silvestri, ___ _________ 787 F.2d at 746 . 16 States v. Seals, 987 F.2d 1102 , 1107-08 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, ______ _____ _____ ______ 114 S. Ct. 155 (1993); United States v. Horn, 970 F.2d 728 , 732 _____________ ____ (10th Cir. 1992); United States v. Williams, 936 F.2d 1243 , 1248- _____________ ________ 49 (11th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 112 S. Ct. 1279 (1992); United _____ ______ ______ States v. Mancera-Londono, 912 F.2d 373, 375-76 (9th Cir. 1990); ______ _______________ United States v. Arango, 879 F.2d 1501 , 1507 n.2 (7th Cir. 1989), _____________ ______ cert. denied, 493 U.S…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Douglas Merrill Nielsen
See United States v. Seals, 987 F.2d 1102 , 1107 & n. 8 (5th Cir.) (if narcotics detection dog alerts only to a vehicle’s passenger compartment, probable cause extends only to that part of the vehicle) (citing Ross, 456 U.S. at 824 , 102 S.Ct. at 2172 ), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 155 , 126 L.Ed.2d 116 (1993).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Owen
Batson, 476 U.S. at 94 , 106 S.Ct. at 1721-22 ; see also United States v. Seals, 987 F.2d 1102, 1108 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 853 , 114 S.Ct. 155 , 126 L.Ed.2d 116 (1993).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Chronister
See, also, U.S. v. Seals, 987 F.2d 1102 (5th Cir. 1993), cert. denied _ U.S. _, 114 S. Ct. 155 , 126 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thyrus Montez Brown
See United States v. Garrett, 903 F.2d 1105 , 1113 & n. 11 (7th Cir.) (collecting cases), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 905 , 111 S.Ct. 272 , 112 L.Ed.2d 227 (1990); United States v. Rush, 890 F.2d 45, 49 (7th Cir.1989); see also United States v. Tarazon, 989 F.2d 1045, 1053 (9th Cir.1993), cert. denied , — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 155 , 126 L.Ed.2d 116 (1993); Dunn, 846 F.2d at 764 ; cf. Boissoneault, 926 F.2d at 234 (defendant arrested for a traffic violation, displayed no furtive activity, and did not possess a gun or other weapon); United States v. Franklin, 728 F.2d 994, 995, 1000 (8th Cir.1984) (def…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dang Minh Tran
v.
Maass, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary
v.
Maass, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary
No. 92-9134.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1993.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.