Grooms v. United States, 511 U.S. 1035 (1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Grooms v. United States, 511 U.S. 1035 (1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Lance Hack (ca8, 2002-03-13)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Lance Hack
8th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Abanatha, 999 F.2d 1246, 1251 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1035 , 114 S.Ct. 1549 , 128 L.Ed.2d 199 (1994).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. McMillan
S.D. Miss. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lee, 6 F.3d 1297, 1301 (8th Cir.1993) (en banc), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1035 , 114 S.Ct. 1550 , 128 L.Ed.2d 199 (1994) (case brought pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. § 241 8 for civil rights conspiracy, where the jury was improperly instructed that to convict they need not find a threat of physical force of intimidation of physical fear); and Watts v. United States, 394 U.S. 705 , 89 S.Ct. 1399 , 22 L.Ed.2d 664 (1969).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Stephen Hartbarger, Lonnie Hartbarger, and Phillip W. Lafary
7th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
We rejected the reasoning of the Eighth Circuit which relied on an analysis of the legislative history in concluding that § 844(h)(1) is limited to arson cases and does not apply to cross-burnings Id. at 1248; see United States v. Lee, 935 F.2d 952 (8th Cir.1991), certiorari denied, 511 U.S. 1035 , 114 S.Ct. 1550 , 128 L.Ed.2d 199 (1994).
discussed Cited "see" Tompkins v. Cyr
N.D. Tex. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lee, 935 F.2d 952, 955 (8th Cir.1991), rev’d on other grounds, 6 F.3d 1297 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1035 , 114 S.Ct. 1550 , 128 L.Ed.2d 199 (1994) (finding a substantial government interest in protection from conspiracies to violate federally guaranteed rights). b.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Joseph Corona, III Lindsey McDonald
5th Cir. · 1997 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Hayward, 6 F.3d at 1246-48 (allowing a § 844(h)(1) conviction even where the fire’s purpose is not to destroy property), with United States *574 v. Lee, 935 F.2d 952 (8th Cir.1991) (concluding that § 844(h)(1) does not apply to nondestructive fires), reh’g en banc granted on other grounds, 6 F.3d 1297 (8th Cir.1993) (en banc), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1035 , 114 S.Ct. 1550 , 128 L.Ed.2d 199 (1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Grooms
v.
United States
No. 93-7459.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 18, 1994.
511 U.S. 1035
Published

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.