green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Pruitt
See United States v. Gonzalez-Lerma, 14 F.3d 1479, 1483 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 511 U.S. *1220 1095, 114 S.Ct. 1862 , 128 L.Ed.2d 484 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Pruitt
See United States v. Gonzalez-Lerma, 14 F.3d 1479, 1483 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1095 , 114 S.Ct. 1862 , 128 L.Ed.2d 484 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Denny Ray Hunnicutt
See United States v. Gonzalez-Lerma, 14 F.3d 1479, 1483 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1095 , 114 S.Ct. 1862 , 128 L.Ed.2d 484 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Villota-Gomez
Sandoval, 29 F.3d at 540 ; see Lee, 73 F.3d at 1040 (The Tenth Circuit has “consistently held ‘that an-encounter initiated by a traffic stop may not be deemed consensual unless the driver’s documents have been returned to him.’ ”) (quoting United States v. Gonzalez-Lerma, 14 F.3d 1479, 1483 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1095 , 114 S.Ct. 1862 , 128 L.Ed.2d 484 (1994)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Mario Chalarca, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
(2×)
See United States v. Naranjo, 14 F.3d 145, 147 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1862 , 128 L.Ed.2d 484 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anderson
See Lee, 73 F.3d at 1040 (The Tenth Circuit has “consistently held ‘that an encounter initiated by a traffic stop may not be deemed consensual unless the driver’s documents have been returned to him.’ ”) (quoting United States v. Gonzalez-Lerma, 14 F.3d 1479, 1483 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1862 , 128 L.Ed.2d 484 (1994)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wood
An ordinary traffic stop is a limited seizure, however, and is more like an investigative detention than a custodial arrest.” United States v. Walker, 933 F.2d 812, 815 (10th Cir.), reh’g denied, 941 F.2d 1086 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1093 , 112 S.Ct. 1168 , 117 L.Ed.2d 414 (1992); see United States v. Gonzalez-Lerma, 14 F.3d 1479, 1483 (10th Cir.) (“A traffic stop is an investigative detention analogous to a Terry- stop.”) (citing United States v. Soto, 988 F.2d 1548, 1554 (10th Cir.1993)), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1862 , 128 L.Ed.2d 484 (1994); United States…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rene Gonzalez-Lerma
See U.S. v. Gonzalez-Lerma, 14 F.3d 1479, 1484-86 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1862 , 128 L.Ed.2d 484 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hernandez
An ordinary traffic stop is a limited seizure, however, and is more like an investigative detention than a custodial arrest.” United States v. Walker, 933 F.2d 812, 815 (10th Cir.), reh’g denied, 941 F.2d 1086 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1093 , 112 S.Ct. 1168 , 117 L.Ed.2d 414 (1992); see United States v. Gonzalez-Lerma, 14 F.3d 1479, 1483 (10th Cir.) (“A traffic stop is an investigative detention analogous to a Terry-stop.”) (citing United States v. Soto, 988 F.2d 1548, 1554 (10th Cir.1993)), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1862 , 128 L.Ed.2d 484 (1994); United States …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sanchez
See United States v. Gonzalez-Lerma, 14 F.3d 1479, 1483 (10th Cir.) (“A traffic stop is an investigative detention analogous to a Terry -stop.”) (citing United States v. Soto, 988 F.2d 1548, 1554 (10th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1862 , 128 L.Ed.2d 484 (1994)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hernandez
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Gonzalez-Lerma, 14 F.3d 1479, 1484 (10th Cir.), cert. denied 511 U.S. 1095 , 114 S.Ct. 1862 , 128 L.Ed.2d 484 (1994); Turner, 928 F.2d at 958-59 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Maria Ann Richardson
See United States v. Eylicio-Montoya, 18 F.3d 845, 848 (10th Cir.1994) ("stopping an automobile and detaining its occupants constitute[s] a "seizure" within the meaning of [the Fourth] Amendment' ") (citation omitted); see also United States v. Gonzalez-Lerma, 14 F.3d 1479, 1483 (10th Cir.) ("A traffic stop is an investigative detention"), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 1862 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Lambert
(2×)
Compare United States v. Gonzalez-Lerma, 14 F.3d 1479, 1483 (10th Cir.) (“This Circuit follows the bright-line rule that an encounter initiated by a traffic stop may not be deemed consensual unless the driver’s documents have been returned to him.”), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 1862 , 128 L.Ed.2d 484 (1994) and United States v. Walker, 933 F.2d 812, 817 (10th Cir.1991) (“the encounter in this case was clearly not consensual.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Naranjo
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 93-8677.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 16, 1994.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.