Naranjo v. United States, 511 U.S. 1095 (1994). · Go Syfert
Naranjo v. United States, 511 U.S. 1095 (1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
65 citation events (14 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Pruitt (ca11, 1999-05-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Pruitt
11th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Gonzalez-Lerma, 14 F.3d 1479, 1483 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 511 U.S. *1220 1095, 114 S.Ct. 1862 , 128 L.Ed.2d 484 (1994).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Pruitt
11th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Gonzalez-Lerma, 14 F.3d 1479, 1483 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1095 , 114 S.Ct. 1862 , 128 L.Ed.2d 484 (1994).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Denny Ray Hunnicutt
10th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Gonzalez-Lerma, 14 F.3d 1479, 1483 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1095 , 114 S.Ct. 1862 , 128 L.Ed.2d 484 (1994).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Villota-Gomez
D. Kan. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
Sandoval, 29 F.3d at 540 ; see Lee, 73 F.3d at 1040 (The Tenth Circuit has “consistently held ‘that an-encounter initiated by a traffic stop may not be deemed consensual unless the driver’s documents have been returned to him.’ ”) (quoting United States v. Gonzalez-Lerma, 14 F.3d 1479, 1483 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1095 , 114 S.Ct. 1862 , 128 L.Ed.2d 484 (1994)).
discussed Cited "see" United States of America, Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Mario Chalarca, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant (2×)
2d Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Naranjo, 14 F.3d 145, 147 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1862 , 128 L.Ed.2d 484 (1994).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Anderson
D. Kan. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lee, 73 F.3d at 1040 (The Tenth Circuit has “consistently held ‘that an encounter initiated by a traffic stop may not be deemed consensual unless the driver’s documents have been returned to him.’ ”) (quoting United States v. Gonzalez-Lerma, 14 F.3d 1479, 1483 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1862 , 128 L.Ed.2d 484 (1994)).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Wood
D. Kan. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
An ordinary traffic stop is a limited seizure, however, and is more like an investigative detention than a custodial arrest.” United States v. Walker, 933 F.2d 812, 815 (10th Cir.), reh’g denied, 941 F.2d 1086 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1093 , 112 S.Ct. 1168 , 117 L.Ed.2d 414 (1992); see United States v. Gonzalez-Lerma, 14 F.3d 1479, 1483 (10th Cir.) (“A traffic stop is an investigative detention analogous to a Terry- stop.”) (citing United States v. Soto, 988 F.2d 1548, 1554 (10th Cir.1993)), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1862 , 128 L.Ed.2d 484 (1994); United States…
cited Cited "see" United States v. Rene Gonzalez-Lerma
10th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See U.S. v. Gonzalez-Lerma, 14 F.3d 1479, 1484-86 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1862 , 128 L.Ed.2d 484 (1994).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Hernandez
D. Kan. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
An ordinary traffic stop is a limited seizure, however, and is more like an investigative detention than a custodial arrest.” United States v. Walker, 933 F.2d 812, 815 (10th Cir.), reh’g denied, 941 F.2d 1086 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1093 , 112 S.Ct. 1168 , 117 L.Ed.2d 414 (1992); see United States v. Gonzalez-Lerma, 14 F.3d 1479, 1483 (10th Cir.) (“A traffic stop is an investigative detention analogous to a Terry-stop.”) (citing United States v. Soto, 988 F.2d 1548, 1554 (10th Cir.1993)), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1862 , 128 L.Ed.2d 484 (1994); United States …
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Sanchez
D. Kan. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Gonzalez-Lerma, 14 F.3d 1479, 1483 (10th Cir.) (“A traffic stop is an investigative detention analogous to a Terry -stop.”) (citing United States v. Soto, 988 F.2d 1548, 1554 (10th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1862 , 128 L.Ed.2d 484 (1994)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Hernandez (2×)
10th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Gonzalez-Lerma, 14 F.3d 1479, 1484 (10th Cir.), cert. denied 511 U.S. 1095 , 114 S.Ct. 1862 , 128 L.Ed.2d 484 (1994); Turner, 928 F.2d at 958-59 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Maria Ann Richardson
10th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
See United States v. Eylicio-Montoya, 18 F.3d 845, 848 (10th Cir.1994) ("stopping an automobile and detaining its occupants constitute[s] a "seizure" within the meaning of [the Fourth] Amendment' ") (citation omitted); see also United States v. Gonzalez-Lerma, 14 F.3d 1479, 1483 (10th Cir.) ("A traffic stop is an investigative detention"), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 1862 (1994).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Robert Lambert (2×)
10th Cir. · 1995 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare United States v. Gonzalez-Lerma, 14 F.3d 1479, 1483 (10th Cir.) (“This Circuit follows the bright-line rule that an encounter initiated by a traffic stop may not be deemed consensual unless the driver’s documents have been returned to him.”), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 1862 , 128 L.Ed.2d 484 (1994) and United States v. Walker, 933 F.2d 812, 817 (10th Cir.1991) (“the encounter in this case was clearly not consensual.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Naranjo
v.
United States
No. 93-8677.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 16, 1994.
511 U.S. 1095
Published

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.