green
Positive treatment
10.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 36 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Glossip v. Gross
See Campbell v. Wood, 511 U.S. 1119 , 1121-1123, 114 S.Ct. 2125 , 128 L.Ed.2d 682 (1994) (Blackmun, J., dissenting from denial of stay of execution and certiorari); Glass v. Louisiana, 471 U.S. 1080 , 1085, 105 S.Ct. 2159 , 85 L.Ed.2d 514 (1985) (Brennan, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sabree v. United States
See Martinez v. United States, 333 F.3d at 1313 (“[T]he Court of Federal Claims lacks APA jurisdiction....") (citing Murphy v. United States, 993 F.2d 871, 874 (Fed.Cir.1993)), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1019 , 114 S.Ct. 1402 , 128 L.Ed.2d 75 , reh'g denied, 511 U.S. 1118 , 114 S.Ct. 2123 , 128 L.Ed.2d 681 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Scott
See State v. Myers, 260 Kan. 669 , Syl. ¶ 3, 923 P.2d 1024 (1996), cert. denied 511 U.S. 1118 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Teichman v. United States
See Martinez v. United States, 333 F.3d at 1313 (“[T]he Court of Federal Claims lacks APA jurisdiction----”) (citing Murphy v. United States, 993 F.2d 871, 874 (Fed.Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1019 , 114 S.Ct. 1402 , 128 L.Ed.2d 75 , reh’g denied, 511 U.S. 1118 , 114 S.Ct. 2123 , 128 L.Ed.2d 681 (1994)).
cited
Cited "see"
Koretsky v. United States
See Murphy v. United States, 993 F.2d 871 (Fed.Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1118 , 114 S.Ct. 2123 , 128 L.Ed.2d 681 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Golding v. United States
Accord Murphy v. United States, 993 F.2d 871 , 872 n. 2, 873 (Fed.Cir.), reh’g denied (1993) (Air Force Regulation 36-12 had not been published in the Federal Register), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1019 , 114 S.Ct. 1402 , 128 L.Ed.2d 75 , reh’g denied, 511 U.S. 1118 , 114 S.Ct. 2123 , 128 L.Ed.2d 681 (1994); Dodson v. United States, 988 F.2d 1199, 1204 (Fed.Cir.), reh’g denied (1993) (Army Qualification Management Program Regulations 600-200, 601-280, 623-205, 635-200 had not been published in the Federal Register, although the Army, having promulgated the Program Regulations, was required to…
discussed
Cited "see"
Provenzano v. Moore
See Campbell, 18 F.3d at 700 (Reinhardt, J., dissenting). [32] But see Campbell v. Wood, 511 U.S. 1119, 1120-21 , 114 S.Ct. 2125 , 128 L.Ed.2d 682 (1994) (Blackmun, J., dissenting) (contending that the Ninth Circuit should have conducted an analysis under the "evolving standards of decency" criterion). [33] Under the California scheme at that time, a defendant could choose the method of execution, either lethal gas or injection, with the default falling to lethal gas.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Morton
(2×)
See Campbell v. Wood, 18 F. 3d 662, 672 (9th Cir.) (holding that a capital defendant can waive his right to be present at jury selection), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1119 , 114 S.Ct. 2125 , 128 L.Ed. 2d 682 (1994); People v. Robertson, 48 Cal. 3d 18 , 255 Cal. Rptr. 631 , 767 P. 2d 1109, 1134 (holding that a capital defendant can waive his right to be present at a penalty-reduction hearing), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 879 , 110 S.Ct. 216 , 107 L.Ed. 2d 169 (1989); Peede v. State, 474 So. 2d 808, 814 (Fla. 1985) (holding that a capital defendant can waive his right to be present at the guilt phase), ce…
discussed
Cited "see"
LaGrand v. Stewart
See Campbell v. Wood, 18 F.3d 662, 668 (9th Cir.) (“The risk of accident cannot and need not be eliminated from the execution process in order to survive constitutional review.”), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1119 , 114 S.Ct. 2125 , 128 L.Ed.2d 682 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1998
See Campbell v. Wood, 18 F.3d 662, 668 (9th Cir.) ("The risk of accident cannot and need not be eliminated from the execution process in order to survive constitutional review."), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1119 , 114 S.Ct. 2125 , 128 L.Ed.2d 682 (1994). 62 The LaGrands' challenge is similar to that rejected in Poland, 117 F.3d at 1104-05 , and the district court did not err in rejecting their challenge to Arizona's use of lethal injection as a method of execution.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lawrence Warren Smith
See Campbell v. Wood, 18 F.3d 662, 675-76 (9th Cir.) (petitioner cannot create a different ground merely by couching his argument in different language), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 2125 (1994); Molina v. Rison, 886 F.2d 1124, 1127-29 (9th Cir.1989) (a ground is successive if the gravamen of the legal claim was adjudicated on its merits in a prior proceeding).
discussed
Cited "see"
Conoco, Inc. v. Taxation and Revenue Department
See Conoco, 122 N.M. at 755 , 931 P.2d at 749 (citing Campbell v. Wood, 18 F.3d 662, 680 (9th Cir.1994) (reviewing the constitutionality of probation conditions even though incarceration was an option to the probationer), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1119 , 114 S.Ct. 2125 , 128 L.Ed.2d 682 (1994)).
cited
Cited "see"
Michael K. POLAND, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Terry STEWART, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee
See Campbell v. Wood, 18 F.3d 662, 688 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2125 , 128 L.Ed.2d 682 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert W. Guthrie
See Campbell v. Wood, 18 F.3d 662, 679 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 2125 (1994). 4 Guthrie was not denied the opportunity to challenge the interstate commerce element of his offense.
discussed
Cited "see"
Compassion In Dying v. State Of Washington
See Campbell v. Wood, 20 F.3d 1050, 1051, 1053 (Part II) (9th Cir.) (Reinhardt, J., dissenting from failure to grant rehearing en banc by full court), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 2125 , 128 L.Ed.2d 682 (1994). 8 Judge Reinhardt urged in his dissent from full court rehearing in Campbell that the issue in that case was of the utmost constitutional importance and that it was wrongly decided. 20 F.3d at 1053 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Compassion in Dying v. Washington
See Campbell v. Wood, 20 F.3d 1050, 1051, 1053 (Part II) (9th Cir.) (Reinhardt, J., dissenting from failure to grant rehearing en banc by full court), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2125 , 128 L.Ed.2d 682 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Matthew Enoyoje Onaghise
See Campbell v. Wood, 18 F.3d 662, 679 (9th Cir.) (evidentiary hearing not required on allegations that are wholly conclusory), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 2125 (1994). 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Edward Evanson
See Campbell v. Wood, 18 F.3d 662, 675-76 (9th Cir.) (petitioner cannot create a different ground merely by couching his argument in different language), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 2125 (1994); Molina v. Rison, 886 F.2d 1124, 1127-29 (9th Cir.1989) (a ground is successive if the gravamen of the legal claim was adjudicated on its merits in a prior proceeding).
discussed
Cited "see"
Terrance Rene David v. Ivalee Henry Office of the Attorney General, State of California Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General
(2×)
See Campbell v. Blodgett, 18 F.3d 662, 679 (9th Cir.) (evidentiary hearing not required on allegations that are wholly conclusory or that can be resolved by reference to state court record), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 2125 (1994); see also Fretwell, 113 S.Ct. at 843 ; Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lupe Gomez
(2×)
Tansy, 911 F.2d at 396 ; Illinois v. Allen, 397 U.S. 337, 343 , 90 S.Ct. 1057, 1060 , 25 L.Ed.2d 353 (1970); Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019, 1023 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); see Campbell v. Wood, 18 F.3d 662, 672 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 2125 , 128 L.Ed.2d 682 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
ca9 1995
See Campbell v. Wood, 18 F.3d 662, 681 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 2125 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jerry Dempsey McIntyre v. Sherman Hatcher
See Campbell v. Wood, 18 F.3d 662, 679 (9th Cir.) (evidentiary hearing unnecessary where allegations are conclusory and lack specificity), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 2125 (1994). 7 AFFIRMED. * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.
discussed
Cited "see"
Peter Michael Bergne v. William A. Duncan, Warden Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General of the State of California
See Campbell v. Wood, 18 F.3d 662, 679 (9th Cir.) (evidentiary hearing required where petitioner's allegations, if proved, would establish right to relief, and issues cannot be resolved by reference to state court record), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 2125 (1994). 12 Bergne also contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because his attorney failed to call additional expert witnesses at the competency hearing.
discussed
Cited "see"
David Lewis Rice v. Tana Wood, Superintendent, David Lewis Rice v. Tana Wood, Superintendent
(2×)
See Campbell v. Wood, 18 F.3d 662, 672 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2125 , 128 L.Ed.2d 682 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dean Ashworth v. Eddie R. Myers
See Campbell v. Blodgett, 18 F.3d 662, 679 (9th Cir.) (evidentiary hearing not required on allegations that are wholly conclusory or that can be resolved by reference to state court record), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 2125 (1994); see also Fretwell, 113 S.Ct. at 843 ; Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694 . 19 F. Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel 20 Ashworth contends he received ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, among other reasons, because his counsel had a conflict of interest.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Childers v. United States
See Roth v. United States, 378 F.3d 1371, 1385 (Fed.Cir.) (holding that “questions of procedural compliance are justiciable”), reh’g denied (2004); see also Murphy v. United States, 993 F.2d 871, 873 (Fed.Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1019 , 114 S.Ct. 1402 , 128 L.Ed.2d 75 , reh’g denied, 511 U.S. 1118 , 114 S.Ct. 2123 , 128 L.Ed.2d 681 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Murphy v. Sirmons
Compare Campbell v. Wood, 18 F.3d 662, 681-683 (9th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1119 , 114 S.Ct. 2125 , 128 L.Ed.2d 682 (1994) (holding hanging is not cruel and unusual simply “because there may be some pain associated with death”); Felker v. Turpin, 101 F.3d 95, 97 (11th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 989 , 117 S.Ct. 450 , 136 L.Ed.2d 345 (1996) (holding no merit to Petitioner’s claim that death by electrocution constitutes cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments); and Gray v. Lucas, 710 F.2d 1048,1061 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 463 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Banerjee v. States
See Roth v. United States, 378 F.3d 1371, 1385 (Fed.Cir.) (holding that “questions of procedural compliance are justiciable”), reh’g denied (2004); see also Murphy v. United States, 993 F.2d 871, 873 (Fed.Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1019 , 114 S.Ct. 1402 , 128 L.Ed.2d 75 , reh’g denied, 511 U.S. 1118 , 114 S.Ct. 2123 , 128 L.Ed.2d 681 (1994).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Palmer v. Clarke
See, e.g., Campbell, 511 U.S. at 1119 , 114 S.Ct. 2125 (regarding hanging).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Haselrig v. United States
Accord Adkins v. United States, 68 F.3d at 1322 ; Sargisson v. United States, 913 F.2d at 922 ; see also Murphy v. United States, 993 F.2d 871, 873 (Fed.Cir.), reh’g denied and en banc suggestion declined (1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1019 , 114 S.Ct. 1402 , 128 L.Ed.2d 75 , reh’g denied, 511 U.S. 1118 , 114 S.Ct. 2123 , 128 L.Ed.2d 681 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lambright v. Lewis
See e.g., Campbell v. Wood, 18 F.3d 662 (9th Cir.1994) (discussing the growing use of lethal injection but finding hanging constitutional) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 2125 , 128 L.Ed.2d 682 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael Murphy v. K.W. Prunty, Warden Attorney General of the State of California
See Wainwright v. Torna, 455 U.S. 586, 587-88 (1982) (per curiam); see also Campbell v. Wood, 18 F.3d 662, 676-77 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 2125 (1994). 9 AFFIRMED. * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fierro v. Gomez
See also Campbell v. Wood, 18 F.3d 662, 682 (9th Cir.1994) (en banc), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2125 , 128 L.Ed.2d 682 (1994) (concluding that, although the number of states using a particular method of execution, hanging, "is evidence of public perception," such evidence is not dispositive merely because few states continue using that particular method). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fierro v. Gomez
See also Campbell v. Wood, 18 F.3d 662, 682 (9th Cir.1994) (en banc), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 2125 , 128 L.Ed.2d 682 (1994) (concluding that, although the number of states using a particular method of execution, hanging, "is evidence of public perception," such evidence is not dispositive merely because few states continue using that particular method) 5 The district court relied on evidence of only one hanging, that of Westley Allan Dodd, conducted in 1993 in accordance with the protocol.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Conoco, Inc. v. State Taxation & Revenue Department
See, e.g., Campbell v. Wood, 18 F.3d 662, 680 (9th Cir.) (en bane) (court recognizes that it reviews constitutionality of probation conditions although probationer could have chosen incarceration, in which case dispute about probation conditions would not have arisen), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1119 , 114 S.Ct. 2125 , 128 L.Ed.2d 682 (1994); State v. Charlton, 115 N.M. 35, 37-38 , 846 P.2d 341, 343-44 (Ct.App.1992) (court reviews banishment as apparent condition of probation or suspended sentence), cert. denied, 114 N.M. 577 , 844 P.2d 827 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William Merlin Goucher v. Eddie Yist, Warden Attorney General of California
See Napue, 360 U.S. at 269 ; Norris, 878 F.2d at 1180 ; see also Campbell v. Wood, 18 F.3d 662, 679 (9th Cir.) (evidentiary hearing unnecessary where allegations are conclusory and lack specificity), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 2125 (1994). 7 We do not address the claim, raised for the first time on appeal, that the trial court erred by allowing the prosecution to present rebuttal evidence.
Campbell
v.
Wood, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary
v.
Wood, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary
No. 93-7002.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 23, 1994.
Published
510 U. S. 1215. Petition for rehearing denied. Justice Blackmun dissents from the denial of rehearing. He would grant the petition for rehearing, grant the petition for certiorari, and vacate petitioner’s death sentence. See Callins v. Collins, 510 U. S. 1141, 1143 (1994).