green
Positive treatment
4.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Eric Arthur Walton, United States of America v. Eldridge Mayfield, A/K/A Sippy
See United States v. Reives, 15 F.3d 42, 46 (4th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1207 , 114 S.Ct. 2679 , 129 L.Ed.2d 813 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Paulson v. State
See United States v. Reives, 15 F.3d 42, 46 (4 th Cir.), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1207 , 114 S.Ct. 2679 , 129 L.Ed.2d 813 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Martin Paint Stores
Corp. v. Bank of Baroda, 15 B.R. 650, 654 (S.D.N.Y.1981); accord Organización JD Ltda. v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 18 F.3d 91 , 95 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2679 , 129 L.Ed.2d 813 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Karl A. Schledwitz
See United States v. Schledwitz, 14 F.3d 603 (6th Cir.1993) (unpublished per curiam), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 2679 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
State Wide Photocopy, Corp. v. Tokai Financial Services, Inc.
See Organizacion JD Ltda. v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, 18 F.3d 91 , 94 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2679 , 129 L.Ed.2d 813 (1994); Manufacturas Intern. v. Mfrs.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hicks v. United States
See also Organizacion JD Ltda. v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 18 F.3d 91 , 95 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1207 , 114 S.Ct. 2679 , 129 L.Ed.2d 813 (1994); Leon County v. Gluesenkamp, 873 So.2d 460, 464 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.2004) (applying this rule where a court order made performance impracticable); Wien Air Alaska v. Bubbel, 723 P.2d 627, 630 (Alaska 1986); Restatement (Second) Contracts § 264 illustr. 4; and see Restatement (First) of Contracts § 458 (1932) (contractual duty is discharged where performance is subsequently prevented or prohibited by "judicial decision”). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Pin Yen Yang
Because the Government did not know that Dr. Lee testified falsely at trial, the Court must determine “only whether there is a reasonable probability that, had the [false testimony] been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different.” United States v. Hawkins, 969 F.2d at 176 (emphasis added); see also Schledwitz v. United States, 169 F.3d 1003, 1012 , cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1207 , 114 S.Ct. 2679 , 129 L.Ed.2d 814 , (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Daniel Oriakhi
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Reives, 15 F.3d 42, 45 (4th Cir.) ("there is no better way of explaining the concept"), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 2679 , 129 L.Ed.2d 813 (1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Reives
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 93-1791.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 13, 1994.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.