green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 7×
21.2 score
G Cite
cited 5× by 5 distinct cases, last quoted 1994 ·
…he fact that the organization's methods and tactics evolved over time did not dictate a finding of two, three, or four separate conspiracies.
⚠ not in text
Topic ↗
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Munoz
in reviewing for cumulative error, the court must review all errors preserved for appeal and all plain errors.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Clemente v. Carnicon Management
a motion ____ _____ for mistrial is directed primarily to the sound discretion of the trial court and its ruling thereon will not be disturbed unless that discretion has been misused.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Aetna Casualty v. Arsenal Auto Repairs
he fact that the organization's methods and tactics evolved over time did not dictate a finding of two, three, or four separate conspiracies.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Aetna Casualty Surety Company v. P & B Autobody, Arsenal Auto Repairs, Inc., Aetna Casualty Surety Company v. Rodco Autobody, Betty Arhaggelidis, Aetna Casualty Surety Company v. P & B Autobody, Betty Arhaggelidis
he fact that the organization's methods and tactics evolved over time did not dictate a finding of two, three, or four separate conspiracies.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Aetna Casualty Surety Co. v. P & B Autobody
he fact that the organization's methods and tactics evolved over time did not dictate a finding of two, three, or four separate conspiracies.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Aetna Casualty v. Arsenal Auto Repairs
he fact that the organization's methods and tactics evolved over time did not dictate a finding of two, three, or four separate conspiracies.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Aetna Casualty v. Arsenal Auto Repairs
he fact that the organization's methods and tactics evolved over time did not dictate a finding of two, three, or four separate conspiracies.
discussed
Cited "see"
Vega-Martinez v. Hospital San Antonio, Inc.
In summary, the First Circuit has held that: When faced with a proffer of expert testimony, the district court must determine whether the expert witness is qualified and has specialized knowledge that will “assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue.” Fed.R.Evid. 702; see generally United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1183 (1st Cir.1993) (citing Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 591 , 113 S.Ct. 2786, 2795 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993)), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1223 , 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lachman
See generally United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1216, 1220 (1st Cir.1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1223 , 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Potter
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1195-96 (1st Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1223 , 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994); Moreno, 991 F.2d at 947 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Santiago-Vazquez
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1195-96 (1st Cir.1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1223 , 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994); see also United States v. Meserve, 271 F.3d 314, 332 (1st Cir.2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ford v. United States
United States v. Thomas, 116 F.3d 606, 616 (2d Cir.1997) (emphasis added); see United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1190 (1st Cir.1993) (trial judge “may instruct the jury on the dimensions of their duty to the exclusion of jury nullification”), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1223 , 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994); United States v. Krzyske, 836 F.2d 1013, 1021 (6th Cir.) (although jury has a “ ‘right’ to reach any verdict it wishes,” court has a “duty ... to instruct the jury only as to the correct law applicable to the particular case”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 832 , 109 S…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Laurent, K2/95-0562a (2000)
See United States v. DeLuca 945 F. Supp. 409 , 412 (D.R.I. 1996) (citing United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1216 , 1220 (1st Cir. 1993), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 1 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alston
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1190 (1st Cir.1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1223 , 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Guerrero-Cortez
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1199-1200 (1st Cir.1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1223 , 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994); United States v. Saccoccia, 58 F.3d 754, 790-91 (1st.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Giovanny Armando Guerrero-Cortez, A/K/A Gil, United States of America v. Roberto Soler, A/K/A Robert, A/K/A Bob, United States of America v. William Gonzalez-Gonzalez
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1199-1200 (1st Cir.1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1223 , 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994); United States v. Saccoccia, 58 F.3d 754, 790-91 (1st.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. McMahon
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161 , (1st Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 2714 (1994); United States v. Buchanan, 787 F.2d 477 (10th Cir. 1986), rev'd on other grounds after remand, 891 F.2d 1436 (10th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1088 (1990); United States v. Johnston, 578 F.2d 1352 (10th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 931 (1978).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Samuel H. McMahon Jr.
(4×)
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161 , (1st Cir.1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1223 , 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994); United States v. Buchanan, 787 F.2d 477 (10th Cir.1986), rav’d on other grounds after remand, 891 F.2d 1436 (10th Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, 494 U.S. 1088 , 110 S.Ct. 1829 , 108 L.Ed.2d 958 (1990); United States v. Johnston, 578 F.2d 1352 (10th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 931 , 99 S.Ct. 321 , 58 L.Ed.2d 325 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Elizabeth v. Bogosian v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc. And Daimler-Benz North America Corporation
A. Rule 702 Requirements and Standard of Review When faced with a proffer of expert testimony, the district court must determine whether the expert witness is qualified and has specialized knowledge that will “assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue.” Fed.R.Evid. 702; see generally United States v. Sepulve da, 15 F.3d 1161 , 1183 (1st Cir.1993) (citing Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 591 , 113 S.Ct. 2786, 2795 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993)), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1223 , 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. DeLuca
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1216, 1220 (1st Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Smith
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1173 (1st Cir. ___ _____________ _________ 1993), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 2714 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Morris
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1173 (1st Cir.1993), ce rt. denied, —— U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Josleyn
See ___ United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1178 (1st Cir. 1993), _____________ _________ cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 2714 (1994); see also Fed.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Josleyn
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1178 (1st Cir.1993), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994); see also Fed.R.Crim.P. 16(a)(1)(C) (discovery relating to documents material to defense); 16(c) (continuing duty *1196 to disclose).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. August
The district court must “conclude that the defendant is more likely than not actually responsible for a quantity greater than or equal to the quantity for which the defendant is being held responsible.” United States v. Walton, 908 F.2d 1289, 1302 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 906 , 111 S.Ct. 273 , 112 L.Ed.2d 229 (1990); accord United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1198 (1st Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4136, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6705 United States of America v. Dianne Marie August, United States of America v. Daniel Valentino Badaracco
The district court must "conclude that the defendant is more likely than not actually responsible for a quantity greater than or equal to the quantity for which the defendant is being held responsible." United States v. Walton, 908 F.2d 1289, 1302 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 906 , 111 S.Ct. 273 , 112 L.Ed.2d 229 (1990); accord United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1198 (1st Cir.1993), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Muse
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1190 (1st Cir. 1993) (a trial judge "may block defense attor- neys' attempts to serenade the jury with a siren song of nullifica- tion"), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 2714 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Randall Dwayne Muse
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1190 (1st Cir.1993) (a trial judge “may block defense attorneys’ attempts to serenade the jury with a siren song of nullification”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Staula
(2×)
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161 , 1193 ___ _____________ _________ (1st Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 2714 (1994). _____ ______ Here, the salient dates and events are essentially undisputed.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Staula
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1193 (1st Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Manning
See United States v. ___ ______________ Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1190 (1st Cir. 1993), cert. denied, _________ _____ ______ 114 S. Ct. 2714 (1994); United States v. DesMarais, 938 F.2d _____________ _________ 347, 350 (1st Cir. 1991); Garcia-Rosa, 876 F.2d at 226 ; ___________ United States v. Boardman, 419 F.2d 110, 116 (1st Cir. 1969), _____________ ________ cert. denied, 397 U.S. 991 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Manning
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1190 (1st Cir.1993), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994); United States v. Desmarais, 938 F.2d 347, 350 (1st Cir.1991); Garcia-Rosa, 876 F.2d at 226 ; United States v. Boardman, 419 F.2d 110, 116 (1st Cir.1969), ce rt. denied, 397 U.S. 991 , 90 S.Ct. 1124 , 25 L.Ed.2d 398 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wihbey
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161 , 1191 ___ ______________ _________ (1st Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 2714 (1994). _____ ______ However, we have assumed for the sake of analysis that the evidence was insufficient to support that verdict, and we have momentarily embraced the multiple conspiracy theory. -37- 37 could consider as proof of a conspiracy.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wihbey
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1191 (1st Cir. 1993), cert. denied, -U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Morris
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1173 (1st Cir.1993) cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Patriarca
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1198 (1st Cir.1993) cert. denied — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rivera-Gomez
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1184 (1st Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 2714 (1994); United States v. Ferreira, 821 F.2d 1, 5-6 (1st Cir. 1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Luis Raul Rivera-Gomez
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1184 (1st Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994); United States v. Ferreira, 821 F.2d 1, 5-6 (1st Cir.1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bobby Myers, Jr., United States of America v. Jarmal Lamar Myers
See United States v. Choate, 12 F.3d 1318 , *1373 1320 (4th Cir.1993), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Graciani
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1196 (1st Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1995); United States v. Garcia, 954 F.2d 12, 15 (1st Cir.1992); United States v. Bradley, 917 F.2d 601, 604 (1st Cir.1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Latoscha Ronice Fisher, United States of America v. Frederick Devon Fleming, A/K/A Frog
See United States v. Choate, 12 F.3d 1318, 1321 (4th Cir.1993), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jackman
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d ___ _____________ _________ 1161, 1184 (1st Cir. 1993) ("Declaring a mistrial is a last resort, only to be implemented . . . if the trial judge believes that the jury's exposure to the evidence is likely -18- 18 to prove beyond realistic hope of repair."), cert. denied, _____ ______ 114 S. Ct. 2714 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jackman
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1184 (1st Cir.1993) (“Declaring a mistrial is a last resort, only to be implemented ... if the trial judge believes that the jury’s exposure to the evidence is likely to prove beyond realistic hope of repair.”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Oreto
See United States v. ___ _____________ Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1191 (1st Cir. 1993), cert. denied, _________ ____________ 114 S. Ct. 2714 (1994); United States v. Moran, 984 F.2d _____________ _____ 1299, 1300 (1st Cir. 1993).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Oreto
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1191 (1st Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 2714 (1994); United States v. Moran, 984 F.2d 1299, 1300 (1st Cir. 1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. De Masi
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1194 (1st Cir.1993), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994) 5 Bonasia perfunctorily raises several additional arguments in support of his severance appeal, such as "antagonistic defenses" existing between him and his codefendants, his inability to obtain exculpatory testimony and his inability to sit with his counsel at trial.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. DeMasi
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1194 (1st Cir.1993), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994). .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Oreto, Sr., United States of America v. Frank Oreto, Jr., United States of America v. Dennis Petrosino
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1191 (1st Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2714 , 129 L.Ed.2d 840 (1994); United States v. Moran, 984 F.2d 1299, 1300 (1st Cir.1993).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Bonacorsi
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161, 1190 (1st Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 2714 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Piper
See United States v. Sepulveda, 15 F.3d 1161 , ___ _____________ _________ 1202 (1st Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 2714 (1994); ____________ United States v. Ocasio-Rivera, 991 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir. 1993); ______________ _____________ United States v. Dietz, 950 F.2d 50, 55 (1st Cir. 1993). _____________ _____ 7We note that appellant also alludes in passing to the possibility that the career offender guideline abridges the Equal Protection Clause.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Choate
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 93-8468.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 20, 1994.
Published
Citer courts: First Circuit (6) · Fifth Circuit (1)
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.