discussed Cited "see" United States v. Knowles See United States v. D’Anjou, 16 F.3d 604, 608 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1242 , 114 S.Ct. 2754 , 129 L.Ed.2d 871 (1994) (Sixth Amendment right to counsel did not attach where defendant questioned after arrest but prior to arraignment).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Brown Second, Brown’s contention that counsel was ineffective because he failed to object to the amount of cocaine base attributed to Brown at sentencing is meritless because, as the district court correctly concluded, a co-conspirator is liable for “all reasonably fore- seeable acts and omissions of others in furtherance of the jointly undertaken criminal activity.” U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 1B1.3(a)(1)(B) (1991); see also United States v. D’Anjou, 16 F.3d 604, 614 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1242 (1994).