green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1995 ·
…he purpose of the statute providing for revocation of a driver's license upon conviction of a licensee for driving while intoxicated is to provide an administrative remedy for public protection and not for punishment of the offender.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Zerkel
(2×)
he purpose of the statute providing for revocation of a driver's license upon conviction of a licensee for driving while intoxicated is to provide an administrative remedy for public protection and not for punishment of the offender.
discussed
Cited "see"
Henry v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The purpose of Rule 51 is to “allow both parties to mold their closing arguments to the points of law that will be explained in the final jury charge.” Gor *153 don, 232 F.3d at 118 (citing Wiedersum Assocs. v. Nat’l Homes Const. Corp., 540 F.2d 62, 65-66 (2d Cir.1976)); accord United States v. James, 998 F.2d 74, 79 (2d Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 958 , 114 S.Ct. 415 , 126 L.Ed.2d 362 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert E. Delano
See United States v. James, 998 F.2d 74, 78 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 415 , 126 L.Ed.2d 362 (1993); United States v. Torres, 901 F.2d 205, 227-28 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 906 , 111 S.Ct. 273 , 112 L.Ed.2d 229 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Keyvee Jones
See United States v. James, 998 F.2d 74, 83 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 415 , 126 L.Ed.2d 362 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Darweshi Dinkane
See United States v. James, 998 F.2d 74, 80-82 (2d Cir.) (holding that escape driver with no prior knowledge that robbery would be armed is aider and abettor of aimed bank robbery if he knowingly and willfully joins in the escape phase of an armed bank robbery knowing that an accomplice has a gun), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 415 , 126 L.Ed.2d 362 (1993). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lionel Reifler, Glenn B. Laken, John M. Black, Jr.
See, e.g., United States v. James, 998 F.2d 74, 79-81 (2d Cir.) (a defendant who learned of a bank robbery only during the escape phase and assisted in the escape may be convicted of aiding and abetting that robbery), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 958 , 114 S.Ct. 415 , 126 L.Ed.2d 362 (1993).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Roberto Medina, Daniel Delgado, Also Known as Pepa and Louie Villanueva, Also Known as Tito
Brumby, 23 F.3d at 49 ; see also United States v. James, 998 F.2d 74, 82 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 415 , 126 L.Ed.2d 362 (1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mount
v.
United States
v.
United States
93-6163.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 1, 1993.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Alaska (2)
Mount
v.
United States.
No. 93-6163.
Supreme Court of United States.
November 1, 1993.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 1st Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 996 F. 2d 1209.