green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
8.1 score
“settlement neither requires nor implies any judicial aceeptance of either party's claims or theories, and thus a settlement does not provide the prior success necessary for judicial estoppel”
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In re Mohammad
the proponent of a proposed plan bears the burden of proving essential elements of confirmation by a preponderance of the evidence.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Allegiance Telecom, Inc.
settlement neither requires nor implies any judicial aceeptance of either party's claims or theories, and thus a settlement does not provide the prior success necessary for judicial estoppel
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Voluntary Purchasing Groups, Inc.
1129(a)(7) requires that each holder of a claim in a class either accept the plan or receive at least as much as it would receive in a chapter 7 liquidation.
cited
Cited "see"
David M. Somers & Associates, P.C. v. Kendall
See Bates v. Long Island Railroad Co., 997 F.2d 1028, 1037-38 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 992 , 114 S. Ct. 550 , 126 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
See In re Briscoe Enters., Ltd., 994 F.2d 1160, 1165 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 992 , 114 S.Ct. 550 , 126 L.Ed.2d 451 (1993); In re Genesis Health Ventures, Inc., 266 B.R. 591 , 616 n. 23 (Bankr.D.Del.2001); In re Byrd Foods, Inc. 253 B.R. 196, 199 (Bankr.E.D.Va.2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Esmizadeh
See Seneca Nation of Indians v. State of New York, 26 F.Supp.2d 555 (W.D.N.Y.1998), aff'd, 178 F.3d 95 (2d Cir.1999), cert. de *387 nied, 528 U.S. 1078 , 120 S.Ct. 785 , 145 L.Ed.2d 662 (2000), citing Bates v. Long Island Railroad Co., 997 F.2d 1028, 1037 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 992 , 114 S.Ct. 550 , 126 L.Ed.2d 452 (1993) (District Court for the Western District of New York found no authority for broadening of the doctrine to include seemingly inconsistent legal positions).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Brown
See Matter of Briscoe Enterprises, Ltd., II, 994 F.2d 1160 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 992 , 114 S.Ct. 550 , 126 L.Ed.2d 451 (1993) (Chapter 11 Plan confirmation); 7 Collier on Bankruptcy § 1129.02[4] at pages 1129-22 thru -23 (15th ed. rev.); But see U.S. v. Woodway Stone Co., Inc., 187 B.R. 916, 918 (W.D.Va.1995) (“clear and convincing”) and In re Birdneck Apartment Assocs., II, L.P., 156 B.R. 499 .507 (Bankr.E.D.Va.1993) (also “clear and convincing”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Northern Tankers (Cyprus) Ltd. v. Backstrom
See Bates v. Long Island Railroad Co., 997 F.2d 1028, 1037 (2d Cir.)(''[t]he doctrine of judicial estoppel prevents a party from asserting a factual position in a legal proceeding that is contrary to a position previously taken by him in a prior legal proceeding”), ce rt. denied, 510 U.S. 992 , 114 S.Ct. 550 , 126 L.Ed.2d 452 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
CoreStates Bank, N.A. v. United Chemical Technologies, Inc.
See In re Briscoe Enter., Ltd., II, 994 F.2d 1160 , 1166 (5th Cir.) (reviewing bankruptcy court’s finding concerning feasibility for clear error), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 992 , 114 S.Ct. 550 , 126 L.Ed.2d 451 (1993); accord In re Webb, 932 F.2d 155 , 158 (2d Cir.1991); In re Acequia, Inc., 787 F.2d 1352, 1358 (9th Cir.1986).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Shoen
See In re Briscoe Enterprises, Ltd., II, 994 F.2d 1160 , 1163-65 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 550 , 126 L.Ed.2d 451 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Rosenshein v. Kleban
See Bates v. Long Island Railroad Co., 997 F.2d 1028, 1037-38 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 550 , 126 L.Ed.2d 452 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Berkeley Federal Bank & Trust v. Sea Garden Motel & Apartments (In Re Sea Garden Motel & Apartments)
See Matter of Briscoe Enterprises, Ltd., 994 F.2d 1160 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 550 , 126 L.Ed.2d 451 (1993) (citations omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pajaro Dunes Rental Agency, Inc. v. Spitters (In Re Pajaro Dunes Rental Agency, Inc.)
See Heartland Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Briscoe Enterprises, Ltd., II, d/b/a/ Regalridge Apartments (In the Matter of Briscoe Enterprises, Ltd., II), 994 F.2d 1160, 1163-64 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 550 , 126 L.Ed.2d 451 (1993); Liodas v. Sahadi, 19 Cal.3d 278 , 137 Cal.Rptr. 635 , 562 P.2d 316 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of May
See Matter of Briscoe Enterprises, Ltd., II, 994 F.2d 1160, 1165, n. 26 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 550 , 126 L.Ed.2d 451 (1993); In re Westwood Plaza Apartments, 147 B.R. 692, 698 (Bankr.E.D.Tex.1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Misek-Falkoff v. International Business MacHines Corp.
To establish a prima facie case under Section 504 Of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794 , plaintiff must show that at the time of placement on permanent disability she was (1) handicapped within the meaning of the Act, (2) “otherwise qualified” to perform the essential functions of her given position, (3) placed on inactive status solely by reason of her handicaps, and (4) that the employer was a recipient of federal financial assistance. 33 29 U.S.C. § 794 ; see Bates v. Long Island RR, 997 F.2d 1028 , 1035 (2d Cir), cert. denied - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 550 , 126 L.Ed.2d 452 (1993); Doe v. New York U…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Scott v. Goodman
See, e.g., Bates v. Long Island Railroad Co., 997 F.2d 1028, 1034 (2d Cir.), cert. denied. 510 U.S. 992 , 114 S.Ct. 550 , 126 L.Ed.2d 452 (1993); Coppinger v. *439 Metro-North Commuter R.R., 861 F.2d 33, 38-39 (2d Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
S & P, INC. v. Pfeifer
Courts have interpreted Chapter ll’s feasibility standard to be “firmly rooted in predictions based on objective fact.” In re Clarkson, 767 F.2d 417 , 420 (8th Cir.1985). “[T]he feasibility standard is whether the plan offers a reasonable assurance of success.” Kane v. Johns-Manville Corp., 843 F.2d 636 , 649 (2d Cir.1988); see also In re Briscoe Enters., Ltd., 994 F.2d 1160 , 1166 (5th Cir.) (“Only a reasonable assurance of commercial viability is required.”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 550 , 126 L.Ed.2d 451 (1993); In re Patrician St.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Donna Heilweil v. Mount Sinai Hospital
See Doe, 666 F.2d at 774-75; see also Bates v. Long Island R.R., 997 F.2d 1028 , 1035 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 550 , 126 L.Ed.2d 452 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Julian v. New York City Transit Authority
See, e.g., Bates v. Long Island Railroad, 997 F.2d 1028 , 1035 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 550 , 126 L.Ed.2d 452 (1993); Hogarth v. Thornburgh, 833 F.Supp. 1077, 1084 (S.D.N.Y.1993); Conlon v. City of Long Beach, 676 F.Supp. 1289, 1293 (E.D.N.Y. 1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Continental Casualty Co. v. General Development Corp. (In Re General Development Corp.)
See, e.g., In the Matter of Briscoe Enterprises, Ltd., II, 994 F.2d 1160, 1170 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 550 , 126 L.Ed.2d 451 (1993) (bankruptcy court did not abuse discretion in granting orders nunc pro tunc); In re Pierce, 809 F.2d 1356 (8th Cir.1987) (abuse of discretion standard applicable to nunc pro tunc relief); In re Florida Airlines, Inc., 110 B.R. 570 (M.D.Fla.1990) (abuse of discretion standard applicable to nunc pro tunc relief).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
HEARTLAND FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION
v.
BRISCO ENTERPRISES, LTD., II
v.
BRISCO ENTERPRISES, LTD., II
No. 93-516.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 29, 1993.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.