Butts v. Moutray, 510 U.S. 817 (1993). · Go Syfert
Butts v. Moutray, 510 U.S. 817 (1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
15 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Patrick C. Hyde v. Office of Special Counsel Kathleen Day Koch, Special Counsel, in Her Official Capacity Only (ca10, 1995-04-21)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Patrick C. Hyde v. Office of Special Counsel Kathleen Day Koch, Special Counsel, in Her Official Capacity Only
10th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See DeLeonardis v. Weiseman, 986 F.2d 725, 727 (5th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 69 (1993); Veit v. Heckler, 746 F.2d 508, 510-11 (9th Cir.1984)(quoting Carducci v. Regan, 714 F.2d 171, 175 (D.C.Cir.1983)); cf. Ryon, 894 F.2d at 205 n. 3 (stating that whether mandamus is available to enforce the OSC's investigatory duty is "open question" in Sixth Circuit). 6 Reno v. Catholic Social Services Inc., 113 S.Ct. 2485 (1993), cited generally by petitioner as a source of "guidance regarding judicial review of agency action," but with no explanation of its particular relevance here, see…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Medical Mutual Liability Insurance Society of Maryland v. Davis
Md. · 2001 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Tinsley v. Sea-Land Corporation, 979 F.2d 1382, 1383 (9th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 817 , 114 S.Ct. 69 , 126 L.Ed.2d 38 (1993); H.J.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Loughman v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Co.
3rd Cir. · 1993 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Tinsley v. Sea-Land Corp., 979 F.2d 1382, 1383 (9th Cir.1992) (concluding that “damages were sufficiently ascertained as of the date of the original judgment where on appeal th[e] court ordered the district court to reduce the damage award in proportion to the plaintiffs comparative negligence.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 69 , — L.Ed.2d - (1993); Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Hegler, 818 F.2d 730, 737 (10th Cir.1987) (“This was a large dollar difference but the reversal was not on any basic liability errors or errors in procedure which affected the basic issues but …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Dorothy Loughman v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Company, a Corp. Rhein Braun U.S., a Corp. Monongahela Railway Company, a Corp. James Leach, an Individual David Boggs, an Indiv. Ewing Pollock, an Indiv. And the Law Firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas the Upshur Agency, Inc. Consolidated Coal Company Consol-Land Development Company Rheinbraun Verkaufsgesellschaft, Mblt and Maria Therese Verkaufsgesellschaft Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft, Mbh Rheinische Braunkohlenwerk Ewing Pollock and the Law Firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas, in No. 92-3380. Paul Kent Mabel Kent, in No. 92-3437 v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Company, a Corp. Rhein Braun U.S., a Corp. Monongahela Railway Company, a Corp. James Leach, an Ind. David Boggs, an Ind. Ewing Pollock, an Ind. And the Law Firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas the Upshur Agency Inc. Consolidated Coal Co. Consol-Land Development Co. Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft Mbh Rheinische Braunkohlenwerk James McIntyre Glenna McIntyre in No. 92-3438 v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Company, a Corp. Rhein Braun U.S., a Corp. Monongahela Railway Company, a Corp. Mike Wilson, an Ind. James Leach, an Ind. David Boggs, an Ind. Ewing Pollock, an Ind. And the Law Firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas the Upshur Agency, Inc. Consolidated Coal Co. Consol-Land Development Co. Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft, Mbh Rheinische Braunkohlenwerk Mark E. Headlee Charlotte Headlee, in No. 92-3439 v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Company, a Corporation Rhein Braun U.S., a Corporation Monongahela Railway Company, a Corp. James Leach, an Ind. David Boggs, an Ind. Ewing Pollock, an Ind. And the Law Firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas the Upshur Agency, Inc. Consolidated Coal Co. Consol-Land Development Co. Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft Mbh Rheinische Braunkohlenwerk. Dorothy Loughman v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Company, a Corporation Rhein Braun U.S., a Corporation Monongahela Railway Company, a Corp. James Leach, an Ind. David Boggs, an Ind. Ewing Pollock, an Ind. And the Law Firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas the Upshur Agency, Inc. Consolidated Coal Co. Consol-Land Development Co. Rheinbraun Verkaufsgesellschaft, Mblt and Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft, Mbh Rheinische Braunkohlenwerk Consol Pennsylvania Coal Co. Consol-Land Development Co., Consolidation Coal Co., the Monongahela Railway Co., Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft, Rheinbraun U.S. And Rheinische Braunkohlenwerk, in No. 92-3444. Dorothy Loughman, in No. 92-3445 v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Company, a Corporation Rhein Braun U.S., a Corporation Monongahela Railway Company, a Corp. James Leach, an Ind. David Boggs, an Ind. Ewing Pollock, an Ind. And the Law Firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas the Upshur Agency, Inc. Consolidated Coal Co. Consol-Land Development Co. Rheinbraun Verkaufsgesellschaft, Mblt and Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft, Mbh Rheinische Braunkohlenwerk. Larry Levine Dan Levine Morris Levine Edward Levine, Individuals and Morris Levine Enterprises, Inc., a Corporation and Levine Iron and Metal, Inc., a Corporation v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Company, a Corporation Rhein Braun U.S., a Corporation Monongahela Railway Company, a Corp. James Leach, an Ind. David Boggs, an Ind. Ewing Pollock, an Ind. And the Law Firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas the Upshur Agency, Inc. Consolidated Coal Co. Consol-Land Development Co. Rheinbraun Verkaufsgesellschaft, Mblt Maria Therese Verkaufsgesellschaft, Mblt and Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft, Mbh Rheinische Braunkohlenwerk Larry Levine, Dan Levine, Morris Levine, Morris Levine Enterprises, Inc., and Levine Iron and Metal, Inc., in No. 92-3446. James E. Hughes Linda L. Hughes, in No. 92-3447 v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Company, a Corporation Rhein Braun U.S., a Corporation Monongahela Railway Company, a Corp. William Reese, an Ind. David Boggs, an Ind. Ewing Pollock, an Ind. And the Law Firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas the Upshur Agency, Inc. Consolidated Coal Co. Consol-Land Development Co. And Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft, Mbh Rheinische Braunkohlenwerk. John W. Yesenosky, Jr. Linda M. Yesenosky, in No. 92-3450 v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Company, a Corporation Rhein Braun U.S., a Corporation Monongahela Railway Company, a Corp. William Reese, an Ind. David Boggs, an Ind. Ewing Pollock, an Ind. And the Law Firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas the Upshur Agency, Inc. Consolidated Coal Co. Consol-Land Development Co. Rheinbraun Verkaufsgesellschaft, Mblt Maria Therese Verkaufsgesellschaft, Mblt and Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft, Mbh Rheinische Braunkohlenwerk. Thomas J. Allen, Esquire, Personal Representative of the Estate of John T. Throckmorten, in No. 92-3451 v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Company, a Corporation Rhein Braun U.S., a Corporation Monongahela Railway Company, a Corp. James Leach, an Ind. David Boggs, an Ind. Ewing Pollock, an Ind. And the Law Firm of Pollock, Pollock and Thomas the Upshur Agency, Inc. Consolidated Coal Co. Consol-Land Development Co. Rheinbraun Verkaufsgesellschaft, Mblt Maria Therese Verkaufsgesellschaft, Mblt and Maria Theresia Bergbaugesellschaft, Mbh Rheinische Braunkohlenwerk
3rd Cir. · 1993 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g.,Tinsley v. Sea-Land Corp., 979 F.2d 1382, 1383 (9th Cir.1992) (concluding that "damages were sufficiently ascertained as of the date of the original judgment where on appeal th[e] court ordered the district court to reduce the damage award in proportion to the plaintiff's comparative negligence."), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 69 , --- L.Ed.2d ---- (1993); Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Hegler, 818 F.2d 730, 737 (10th Cir.1987) ("This was a large dollar difference but the reversal was not on any basic liability errors or errors in procedure which affected the basic issues but …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Butts
v.
Moutray
92-1867.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1993.
510 U.S. 817
Published

510 U.S. 817

Butts et al.
v.
Moutray.

No. 92-1867.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 4, 1993.

1

Appeal from the C. A. 8th Cir.

2

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 985 F. 2d 426.