green
Positive treatment
4.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Cantor Fitzgerald v. Peaslee
But see Villar v. Crowley Maritime Corp., 990 F.2d 1489, 1494 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1044 , 114 S.Ct. 690 , 126 L.Ed.2d 658 (1994).
cited
Cited "but see"
Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. v. Peaslee
But see Villar v. Crowley Maritime Corp., 990 F.2d 1489, 1494 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1044 , 114 S.Ct. 690 , 126 L.Ed.2d 658 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mehl v. Canadian Pacific Railway, Ltd.
See Villar v. Crowley Maritime Comp., 990 F.2d 1489 , 1495 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1044 , 114 S.Ct. 690 , 126 L.Ed.2d 658 (1994); Stewart v. Winter, 669 F.2d 328, 331 (5th Cir.1982); Kamm v. California City Dev.
discussed
Cited "see"
Tropf v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company
See Villar v. Crowley Maritime Corp., 990 F.2d 1489, 1498-99 (5th Cir.1993), cert.denied, 510 U.S. 1044 , 114 S.Ct. 690 , 126 L.Ed.2d 658 (1994); Harrelson v. United States, 613 F.2d 114, 116 (5th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tropf v. Fidelity National Title Insurance
See Villar v. Crowley Maritime Corp., 990 F.2d 1489, 1498-99 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1044 , 114 S.Ct. 690 , 126 L.Ed.2d 658 (1994); Harrelson v. United States, 613 F.2d 114, 116 (5th Cir.1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Nordar Holdings, Inc. v. Western Securities (USA) Ltd.
See Villar v. Crowley Maritime Corp., 990 F.2d 1489, 1496 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1044 , 114 S.Ct. 690 , 126 L.Ed.2d 658 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hicks v. Bexar County, Tex.
See Villar v. Crowley Maritime Corporation, 990 F.2d 1489 , 1500 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1044 , 114 S.Ct. 690 , 126 L.Ed.2d 658 (1994); Bogney v. Jones, 904 F.2d at 274 ; and Hale v. Harney, 786 F.2d 688, 692 (5th Cir.1986). 188 .
discussed
Cited "see"
American Jewish Congress v. City of Beverly Hills
See Kreis- ner v. City of San Diego, 1 F.3d 775 , 778 n. 1 (9th Cir.1993) (under federal Constitution), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1044 , 114 S.Ct. 690 , 126 L.Ed.2d 657 (1994); Ellis v. City of La Mesa, 990 F.2d 1518, 1523-24 (9th Cir.1993) (under California Constitution), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2707 , 129 L.Ed.2d 834 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
American Jewish Congress v. City Of Beverly Hills
See Kreisner v. City of San Diego, 1 F.3d 775 , 778 n. 1 (9th Cir.1993) (under federal Constitution), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1044 , 114 S.Ct. 690 , 126 L.Ed.2d 657 (1994); Ellis v. City of La Mesa, 990 F.2d 1518, 1523-24 (9th Cir.1993) (under California Constitution), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1220 , 114 S.Ct. 2707 , 129 L.Ed.2d 834 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7429, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,741 American Jewish Congress Eve Slaff Alan Sieroty Devera Lurie Waldman Charles Waldman v. City of Beverly Hills Allan L. Alexander, Mayor Bernard J. Hecht Robert K. Tanenbaum Maxwell H. Salter Vicki Reynolds, and Chabad of California, Inc., Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee
See Kreisner v. City of San Diego, 1 F.3d 775 , 778 n. 1 (9th Cir.1993) (under federal Constitution), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 690 , 126 L.Ed.2d 657 (1994); Ellis v. City of La Mesa, 990 F.2d 1518, 1523-24 (9th Cir.1993) (under California Constitution), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 2707 , 129 L.Ed.2d 834 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
American Jewish Congress v. City of Beverly Hills
See Kreisner v. City of San Diego, 1 F.3d 775 , 778 n. 1 (9th Cir.1993) (under federal Constitution), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 690 , 126 L.Ed.2d 657 (1994); Ellis v. City of La Mesa, 990 F.2d 1518, 1523-24 (9th Cir.1993) (under California Constitution), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2707 , 129 L.Ed.2d 834 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ashley Hunt Greenwood v. Federal Aviation Administration
See Adams v. FAA, 1 F.3d 955, 956-57 (9th Cir.1993) (per curiam) (court of appeals has no jurisdiction to review decision not to renew a PED because there is “no judieially-manageable standard by which [it can] review the FAA administrator’s decision”), ce rt. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 690 , 126 L.Ed.2d 657 (1994). 1 II.
cited
Cited "see"
Thomas W. Wilson v. David W. Belin and G. Robert Blakey
See Villar v. Crowley Maritime Corp., 990 F.2d 1489, 1494 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 690 , 126 L.Ed.2d 658 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Wilson v. Belin
See Villar v. Crowley Maritime Corp., 990 F.2d 1489, 1494 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 690 , 126 L.Ed.2d 658 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ungerland v. MORGAN STANLEY AND CO., INC.
To conclude otherwise would be contrary not only to the clear intent of the legislature as expressed in §§ 52-417, 52-418 and 52-420 (b), but also to a primary goal of arbitration, namely, the efficient, economical and expeditious resolution of private disputes.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks *182 omitted.) Id., 313; see also Pisciotta v. Shearson Lehman Bros., Inc., 629 A.2d 520, 523 (D.C. 1993) (independent suit for fraud in the arbitration process dismissed where the appellants took no action under the District of Columbia Uniform Arbitration Act within its ninety day time…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Torricellas v. Poole
In applying the first prong of the Lemon test, the Supreme Court has emphasized that the purpose of the challenged action need not have been “exclusively secular.” Lynch v. Donnelly, 465 U.S. at 681 n. 6, 104 S.Ct. at 1363 n. 6; see also Kreisner v. City of San Diego, 1 F.3d 775, 782 (9th Cir.1993) (to violate establishment clause, contested action must be “motivated wholly” by an impermissible purpose), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1044 , 114 S.Ct. 690 , 126 L.Ed.2d 657 (1994).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones v. Warden of the Stateville Correctional Center
See, e.g., Villar v. Crowley Maritime Corp., 990 F.2d 1489, 1499 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 690 , 126 L.Ed.2d 658 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Creatore v. TOWN OF TRUMBULL, CONN.
See, e.g., Kreisner v. City of San Diego, 1 F.3d 775, 784 (9th Cir.1993), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 690 , 126 L.Ed.2d 657 (1994) (assuming “that the reasonable observer is aware of [the] Park’s public forum nature and the City’s first-come, first-served permit policy”). 17.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vernon v. City of Los Angeles
See, e.g., Kreisner v. City of San Diego, 1 F.3d 775, 781 (9th Cir.1993) ("The challenged practice must survive all three prongs of the Lemon analysis in order to pass constitutional muster."), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 690 , 126 L.Ed.2d 657 (1994); Hanna Boys, 940 F.2d at 1303 (same). 63 This Circuit has also held that the first prong of the Lemon test--whether the government action has a secular purpose--is satisfied if one purpose of the government action is secular.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vernon v. City of Los Angeles
See, e.g., Kreisner v. City of San Diego, 1 F.3d 775, 781 (9th Cir.1993) (“The challenged practice must survive all three prongs of the Lemon analysis in order to pass constitutional muster.”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 690 , 126 L.Ed.2d 657 (1994); Hanna Boys, 940 F.2d at 1303 (same).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Adams
v.
Federal Aviation Administration
v.
Federal Aviation Administration
93-698.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 10, 1994.
Published
Adams
v.
Federal Aviation Administration.
No. 93-698.
Supreme Court of United States.
January 10, 1994.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 9th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 1 F. 3d 955.