green
Positive treatment
Circuit Split
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Cantor Fitzgerald v. Peaslee
But see Villar v. Crowley Maritime Corp., 990 F.2d 1489, 1494 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1044 , 114 S.Ct. 690 , 126 L.Ed.2d 658 (1994).
cited
Cited "but see"
Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. v. Peaslee
But see Villar v. Crowley Maritime Corp., 990 F.2d 1489, 1494 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1044 , 114 S.Ct. 690 , 126 L.Ed.2d 658 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mehl v. Canadian Pacific Railway, Ltd.
See Villar v. Crowley Maritime Comp., 990 F.2d 1489 , 1495 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1044 , 114 S.Ct. 690 , 126 L.Ed.2d 658 (1994); Stewart v. Winter, 669 F.2d 328, 331 (5th Cir.1982); Kamm v. California City Dev.
discussed
Cited "see"
Handy v. Shaw, Bransford, Veilleux & Roth
(2×)
See LaShawn A. v. Kelly, 990 F.2d 1319, 1322 (D.C.Cir.1993) ("This Court has never decided whether the District of Columbia is a state for Younger abstention purposes.”), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1044 , 114 S.Ct. 691 , 126 L.Ed.2d 659 (1994); Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
Tropf v. Fidelity National Title Insurance
See Villar v. Crowley Maritime Corp., 990 F.2d 1489, 1498-99 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1044 , 114 S.Ct. 690 , 126 L.Ed.2d 658 (1994); Harrelson v. United States, 613 F.2d 114, 116 (5th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tropf v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company
See Villar v. Crowley Maritime Corp., 990 F.2d 1489, 1498-99 (5th Cir.1993), cert.denied, 510 U.S. 1044 , 114 S.Ct. 690 , 126 L.Ed.2d 658 (1994); Harrelson v. United States, 613 F.2d 114, 116 (5th Cir.1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Nordar Holdings, Inc. v. Western Securities (USA) Ltd.
See Villar v. Crowley Maritime Corp., 990 F.2d 1489, 1496 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1044 , 114 S.Ct. 690 , 126 L.Ed.2d 658 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hicks v. Bexar County, Tex.
See Villar v. Crowley Maritime Corporation, 990 F.2d 1489 , 1500 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1044 , 114 S.Ct. 690 , 126 L.Ed.2d 658 (1994); Bogney v. Jones, 904 F.2d at 274 ; and Hale v. Harney, 786 F.2d 688, 692 (5th Cir.1986). 188 .
discussed
Cited "see"
American Jewish Congress v. City of Beverly Hills
See Kreis- ner v. City of San Diego, 1 F.3d 775 , 778 n. 1 (9th Cir.1993) (under federal Constitution), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1044 , 114 S.Ct. 690 , 126 L.Ed.2d 657 (1994); Ellis v. City of La Mesa, 990 F.2d 1518, 1523-24 (9th Cir.1993) (under California Constitution), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2707 , 129 L.Ed.2d 834 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
American Jewish Congress v. City Of Beverly Hills
See Kreisner v. City of San Diego, 1 F.3d 775 , 778 n. 1 (9th Cir.1993) (under federal Constitution), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1044 , 114 S.Ct. 690 , 126 L.Ed.2d 657 (1994); Ellis v. City of La Mesa, 990 F.2d 1518, 1523-24 (9th Cir.1993) (under California Constitution), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1220 , 114 S.Ct. 2707 , 129 L.Ed.2d 834 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rutigliano v. Valley Business Forms
(2×)
See DeLuca by DeLuca v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 911 F.2d 941, 958 (3d Cir.1990) (testimony must be able to support a jury finding both (i) that the drug can produce birth defects and (ii) that the drug more likely than not caused the birth defects in this particular case), on remand 791 F.Supp. 1042 (D.N.J.1992), aff'd, 6 F.3d 778 (3d Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1044, 114 S.Ct. 691 , 126 L.Ed.2d 658 (1994); see In re Agent Orange Product Liability Lit., 611 F.Supp. 1223, 1250 (E.D.N.Y.1985) (to prove specific causation, plaintiffs expert must first prove general causation and …
cited
Cited "see"
Wellington v. District of Columbia
See LaShawn A. *4 by Moore v. Kelly, 990 F.2d 1319 (D.C.Cir.1993), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 691 , 126 L.Ed.2d 659 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Wedzeb Enterprises, Inc.
See Amcast Industrial Corp. v. Detrex Corp., 2 F.3d 746, 761 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied , — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 691 , 126 L.Ed.2d 658 (1994). 4 28.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ungerland v. MORGAN STANLEY AND CO., INC.
To conclude otherwise would be contrary not only to the clear intent of the legislature as expressed in §§ 52-417, 52-418 and 52-420 (b), but also to a primary goal of arbitration, namely, the efficient, economical and expeditious resolution of private disputes.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks *182 omitted.) Id., 313; see also Pisciotta v. Shearson Lehman Bros., Inc., 629 A.2d 520, 523 (D.C. 1993) (independent suit for fraud in the arbitration process dismissed where the appellants took no action under the District of Columbia Uniform Arbitration Act within its ninety day time…
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Langager v. Crazy Creek Products, Inc.
(4×)
See also Talley v. Flathead Valley Community College (1993), 259 Mont. 479, 487 , 857 P.2d 701, 705 , cert. denied 510 U.S. 1044 , 114 S.Ct. 691 , 126 L.Ed.2d 658 (1994) (court may not disregard the express language of an employment contract and read into the agreement expectations of employment not supported by the contractual language used by the parties). ¶ 41 It is for these same reasons that I disagree with Justice Leaphart's concurrence.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Torricellas v. Poole
In applying the first prong of the Lemon test, the Supreme Court has emphasized that the purpose of the challenged action need not have been “exclusively secular.” Lynch v. Donnelly, 465 U.S. at 681 n. 6, 104 S.Ct. at 1363 n. 6; see also Kreisner v. City of San Diego, 1 F.3d 775, 782 (9th Cir.1993) (to violate establishment clause, contested action must be “motivated wholly” by an impermissible purpose), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1044 , 114 S.Ct. 690 , 126 L.Ed.2d 657 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
T.W. v. Brophy
(2×)
Compare LaShaum A. v. Kelly, 990 F.2d 1319 (D.C.Cir.1993) cert denied 510 U.S. 1044 , 114 S.Ct. 691 , 126 L.Ed.2d 659 (1994) and Thomas v. New York, 814 F.Supp. 1139 (E.D.N.Y.1993) with Christopher B. v. Barry, 715 F.Supp. 1143 (D.D.C.1989) and P. Edward v. Williams, 696 F.Supp. 1432 (D.Utah 1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Shonubi
For example, in a preponderance setting, according to Professor Cohen, “[n]ot only must factfinders determine that their best estimate of the probability in question exceeds the threshold level — 0.5 ... — but they also must have a certain level of confidence that the true probability, based on all possible evidence, exceeds that threshold.” Id. at 399; see, e.g., DeLuca v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 911 F.2d 941 , 948 (3d Cir.1990) (proposing use of confidence intervals, as indicative of the “risks inherent” in decision-making), cer t. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 691 , 1…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Talley
v.
Flathead Valley Community College
v.
Flathead Valley Community College
93-710.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 10, 1994.
Published
Talley
v.
Flathead Valley Community College et al.
No. 93-710.
Supreme Court of United States.
January 10, 1994.
1
Appeal from the Sup. Ct. Mont.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 259 Mont. 479, 857 P. 2d 701.