green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Rudnicki v. Southern College of Optometry (In Re Rudnicki)
See Hiatt v. Indiana Student Assistance Comm’n (In re Hiatt), 36 F.3d 21, 23 (7th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1154 , 115 S.Ct. 1109 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1995); Graddy v. United States (In re Graddy), Case No. 98-22821-B, Adv.
discussed
Cited "see"
Stricklen v. W.D. Ford Direct Consolidation (In Re Stricklen)
See Hiatt v. Indiana State Student Assistance Comm’n, 36 F.3d 21 (7th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1154 , 115 S.Ct. 1109 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1995); United States v. McGrath, 143 B.R. 820 (D.Md.1992), aff'd, 8 F.3d 821 (4th Cir.1993); Cobb v. United Student Aid Funds, Inc. (In re Cobb), 196 B.R. 34 (Bankr.E.D.Va.1996); In re Martin, 137 B.R. 770 (Bankr.W.D.Mo. 1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cobb v. United Student Aid Funds, Inc. (In Re Cobb)
See Hiatt v. Indiana State Student Assistance Comm., 36 F.3d 21 (7th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1109 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1995); United States v. McGrath, 143 B.R. 820 (D.Md.1992) aff'd 8 F.3d 821 (4th Cir.1993) (table); In re Hesselgrave, 177 B.R. 681 (Bankr.D.Or.1995); In re Menendez, 151 B.R. 972 (Bankr.M.D.Fla. 1993); In re Martin, 137 B.R. 770 (Bankr.W.D.Mo.1992); In re Saburah, 136 B.R. 246 (Bankr.C.D.Cal.1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Santa Fe Medical Services, Inc. v. Segal (In Re Segal)
See Hiatt v. Indiana State Student Assistance Comm'n, 36 F.3d 21, 25 (7th Cir.1994) (“We conclude that, in cases in which a debtor has consolidated her educational loans pursuant to 20 U.S.C. § 1078-3 , the plain language of section 523(a)(8)(A) requires that the nondischargeability period commences on the date on which the consolidation loan first became due.”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1109 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1995); Martin v. Great Lakes Higher Educ.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vms Securities Litigation v. Prudential Securities Incorporated
Although the Court in Kokkonen ultimately held that a district court does not have the inherent power to enforce a settlement agreement when its final order does nothing more than dismiss the suit, the Supreme Court noted that when a lower court reserves its power to enforce a settlement, "a breach of the agreement would be a violation of the order, and ancillary jurisdiction to enforce the agreement would therefore exist." Id. at 378-82 , 114 S.Ct. at 1676-77 ; see also Lucille v. City of Chicago, 31 F.3d 546, 548 (7th Cir.1994) (following Kokkonen noting that "if the judgment explicitly inco…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
VMS Ltd. Partnership Securities Litigation v. Prudential Securities Inc.
Although the Court in Kokkonen ultimately held that a district court does not have the inherent power to enforce a' settlement agreement when its final order does nothing more than dismiss the suit, the Supreme Court noted that when a lower court reserves its power to enforce a settlement, “a breach of the agreement would be a violation of the order, and ancillary jurisdiction to enforce the agreement would therefore exist.” Id. at 378-82 , 114 S.Ct. at 1676-77 ; see also Lucille v. City of Chicago, 31 F.3d 546, 548 (7th Cir.1994) (following Kokkonen noting that “if the judgment explicit…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Beckless v. Chater
Id. at 1677; see also Lucille v. City of Chicago, 31 F.3d 546, 548 (7th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. - 115 S.Ct. 1109 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jennifer Lee HIATT
v.
INDIANA STATE STUDENT ASSISTANCE COMMISSION
v.
INDIANA STATE STUDENT ASSISTANCE COMMISSION
No. 94-1155.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1995.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.