green
Positive treatment
5.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Xavier E. Holmes
(2×)
R.Evid. 401; see United States v. Casares-Cardenas, 14 F.3d 1283, 1287 (8th Cir.1994), ce rt. denied, 513 U.S. 849 , 115 S.Ct. 147 , 130 L.Ed.2d 86 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Xavier Holmes
Evid. 401; see United States v. Casares-Cardenas, 14 F.3d 1283, 1287 (8th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 849 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Ortiz v. Artuz
See Samuels v. Mann, 13 F.3d 522, 526 (2d cir.1993) (citing Cruz, 481 U.S. at 193 , 107 S.Ct. 1714 ), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 849 , 115 S.Ct. 134 , 130 L.Ed.2d 85 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
City of Tacoma v. Durham
See generally, In re Personal Restraint of Lord, 123 Wn.2d 296, 314 , 868 P.2d 835 , decision clarified by, 123 Wn.2d 737 , cert. denied, 513 U.S. 849 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
State Ex Rel. Morrow v. LaFleur
(2×)
See In re Blodgett, 510 N.W.2d 910, 914 (Minn.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 849 , 115 S.Ct. 146 , 130 L.Ed.2d 86 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Arlie D. Maggard, United States of America v. Daisy Dawn Maggard, United States of America v. Timothy J. Maggard
See United States v. Casares-Cardenas, 14 F.3d 1283, 1288 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 849 , 115 S.Ct. 147 , 130 L.Ed.2d 86 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Arlie D. Maggard
See United States v. Casares- Cardenas, 14 F.3d 1283, 1288 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 849 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Hidalgo v. Kuhlman
See Samuels v. Mann, 13 F.3d 522, 526 (2d Cir.1993) (citing Cruz, 481 U.S. at 193 , 107 S.Ct. at 1719 ), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 849 , 115 S.Ct. 145 , 130 L.Ed.2d 85 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Elmore
See, e.g., In re Personal Restraint of Lord, 123 Wash.2d 296, 306 , 868 P.2d 835 , clarified on other issues, 123 Wash.2d 737 , 870 P.2d 964 , cert. denied, 513 U.S. 849 , 115 S.Ct. 146 , 130 L.Ed.2d 86 (1994), in which we held a criminal defendant had no right to be present at conferences between the court and counsel regarding the resolution of legal questions, noting: The core of the constitutional right to be present is the right to be present when evidence is being presented.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Elmore
See, e.g., In re Personal Restraint of Lord, 123 Wn.2d 296, 306 , 868 P.2d 835 , clarified on other issues, 123 Wn.2d 737 , 870 P.2d 964 , cert. denied, 513 U.S. 849 , 115 S. Ct. 146 , 130 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Vanoli
See also In re Personal Restraint of Lord, 123 Wn.2d 296, 325 , 868 P.2d 835 (death penalty statute defining aggravated murder as "first degree murder as defined by RCW 9A.32.030(l)(a) as now or hereafter amended” plus one or more specified aggravating factors does not violate Const, art. 2, § 37 merely because it incorporates premeditated murder statute by reference), decision clarified, 123 Wn.2d 737 , cert. denied, 513 U. S. 849 (1994).
Sandoval
v.
California
v.
California
No. 93-9480.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1994.
Published
Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.