green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. De Masi
Cf. Isabel v. United States, 980 F.2d 60, 62-63 (1st Cir.1992) (clarifications of the Guidelines may be applied retroactively, substantive changes may not); but see United States v. O'Brien, 18 F.3d 301, 302 (5th Cir.1994) (eschewing reliance on Sec. 5H1.11 due to ex post facto concerns, nonetheless vacating departure because defendant's charitable work and community service were products of defendant's professional record and professional skills, which are discouraged factors under Sec. 5H1.2 (vocational skills) and Sec. 5H1.5 (employment record)), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 199 ,…
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. DeMasi
Cf. Isabel v. United States, 980 F.2d 60, 62-63 (1st Cir.1992) (clarifications of the Guidelines may be applied retroactively, substantive changes may not); but see United States v. O'Brien, 18 F.3d 301, 302 (5th Cir.1994) (eschewing reliance on § 5H1.11 due to ex post facto concerns, nonetheless vacating departure because defendant's charitable work and community service were products of defendant’s professional record and professional skills, which are discouraged factors under § 5H1.2 (vocational skills) and § 5H1.5 (employment record)), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 199 , 130 L.Ed…
cited
Cited "see"
Atwell v. Hart County
See Horn by Parks v. Madison County Fiscal Court, 22 F.3d 653, 660 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 873 , 115 S.Ct. 199 , 130 L.Ed.2d 130 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
See United States v. IBT, 19 F.3d 816 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 873 , 115 S.Ct. 199 , 130 L.Ed.2d 130 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
See United States v. IBT, 19 F.3d 816 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 873 , 115 S.Ct. 199 , 130 L.Ed.2d 130 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. District Council of New York City
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. International Bhd. of Teamsters (DiGirlamo), 19 F.3d 816, 822 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 199 , 130 L.Ed.2d 130 (1944); United States v. International Bhd. of Teamsters (Adelstein), 998 F.2d 120, 125 (2d Cir.1993); United States of International Bhd. of Teamsters (Cozza), 764 F.Supp. 797, 801-02 (S.D.N.Y.1991) aff'd, 956 F.2d 1161 (2d Cir.1992).
cited
Cited "see"
State ex rel. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Canady
See Witter v. Nesbit, 878 S.W.2d 116, 119 (Tenn.Ct.App.1993), cert. denied, -U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 199 , 130 L.Ed.2d 130 (1994)(quoting Tenn.Code Ann. § 56-7-1206 (1989)). .
discussed
Cited "see"
STATE EX REL. STATE FARM v. Canady
See Witter v. Nesbit, 878 S.W.2d 116, 119 (Tenn.Ct.App.1993), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 199 , 130 L.Ed.2d 130 (1994)(quoting Tenn.Code Ann. § 56-7-1206 (1989)). [10] The court in Craft explained why imposing a duty of good faith on an uninsured motorist carrier was not inconsistent with the substituted liability nature of uninsured motorist coverage and the consequent adversary relationship between insurer and insured....
discussed
Cited "see"
Childs v. State of Ohio
See Horn ex rel Parks v. Madison County Fiscal Court, 22 F.3d 653, 659 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 199 (1994). 9 Upon further review, we conclude that the various prison officials and employees were entitled to summary judgment on Childs's Eighth Amendment claim.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
See United States v. International Bhd. of Teamsters (DiGirlamo), 19 F.3d 816, 822 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 199 , 130 L.Ed.2d 130 (1994); United States v. International Bhd. of Teamsters (Adelstein), 998 F.2d 120, 125 (2d Cir.1993); United States v. International Bhd. of Teamsters (Cozza), 764 F.Supp. 797, 801-02 (S.D.N.Y.1991), aff'd, 956 F.2d 1161 (2d Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Local 1804-1, International Longshoremen's Ass'n
See United States v. International Bhd. of Teamsters (DiGirlamo), 19 F.3d 816 , 822 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, -— U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 199 , 130 L.Ed.2d 130 (1994); United States v. International Bhd. of Teamsters (Adelstein), 998 F.2d 120 , 125 (2d Cir.1993); United States v. International Bhd. of Teamsters (Cozza), 764 F.Supp. 797, 801-02 (S.D.N.Y.1991), aff 'd, 956 F.2d 1161 (2d Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Boggia
See, e.g., United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, AFL-CIO ("DiGirlamo"), 19 F.3d 816, 823 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 873 , 115 S.Ct. 199 , 130 L.Ed.2d 130 (1994); United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, AFL-CIO ("Cimino"), 964 F.2d 1308, 1312 (2d Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Boggia
See, e.g., United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, AFL-CIO (“DiGirlamo”), 19 F.3d 816, 823 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 873 , 115 S.Ct. 199 , 130 L.Ed.2d 130 (1994); United States v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, AFL-CIO (“Cimino”), 964 F.2d 1308, 1312 (2d Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ellis v. Washington County, Tenn.
If a prisoner asks for and needs medical care, it must be supplied.” Danese, 875 F.2d at 1244 ; see also Horn v. Madison County, 22 F.3d 653, 660 (6th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 873 , 115 S.Ct. 199 , 130 L.Ed.2d 130 (1994). (“A detainee’s psychological needs may constitute serious medical needs, especially when they result in suicidal tendencies- Knowledge of the asserted serious needs or of circum *800 stances clearly indicating the existence of such needs, is essential to a finding of deliberate indifference.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,208 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Salomon Inc. And Salomon Brothers Inc., Eric R. Rosenfeld, Claimant-Appellant
See, e.g., United States v. International Bhd. of Teamsters, 19 F.3d 816 , 820 (2d Cir.) (administrator’s decisions, to be reviewed under the same standard of review as is applicable to federal agency actions under the Administrative Procedure Act, are entitled to "great deference” in accordance with judgment provision), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 199 , 130 L.Ed.2d 130 (1994); United States v. International Bhd. of Teamsters, 905 F.2d 610 , 616-17 (2d Cir.1990) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alvarez
See, e.g., United States v. O'Brien, 18 F.3d 301, 302-03 (5th Cir.) (no downward departure because of a defendant's post-conviction community service), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 199 (1994); United States v. Lara-Velasquez, 919 F.2d 946, 954 (5th Cir. 1990) (no downward departure because of a defendant's rehabilitative potential); United States v. Reed, 882 F.2d 147, 151 (5th Cir. 1989) (no downward departure because of a defendant's "worth" or "goodness"); United States v. Burch, 873 F.2d 765, 768 (5th Cir. 1989) (no downward departure because of the defendant's talents).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alvarez
See, e.g., United States v. O’Brien, 18 F.3d 301, 302-03 (5th Cir.) (no downward-departure because of a defendant’s post-conviction community service), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 199 , 130 L.Ed.2d 130 (1994); United States v. Lara-Velasquez, 919 F.2d 946, 954 (5th Cir.1990) (no downward departure because of a defendant’s rehabilitative potential); United States v. Reed, 882 F.2d 147, 151 (5th Cir.1989) (no downward departure because of a defendant’s “worth” or “goodness”); United States v. Burch, 873 F.2d 765, 768 (5th Cir.1989) (no downward departure because of the d…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MATEO ALVAREZ
See, e.g., United States v. O'Brien, 18 F.3d 301, 302-03 (5th Cir.) (no downward departure because of a defendant's post-conviction community service), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 199 (1994); United States v. Lara-Velasquez, 919 F.2d 946, 954 (5th Cir. 1990) (no downward departure because of a defendant's rehabilitative potential); United States v. Reed, 882 F.2d 147, 151 (5th Cir. 1989) (no downward departure because of a defendant's "worth" or "goodness"); United States v. Burch, 873 F.2d 765, 768 (5th Cir. 1989) (no downward departure because of the defendant's talents).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kansas
v.
Valenzuela
v.
Valenzuela
No. 94-163.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1994.
Published
Ct. App. Kan. Certio-rari denied.