green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Macklanburg-Duncan Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
See Thomas v. Peacock, 39 F.3d 493 (4th Cir.1994), cert. granted, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1997 , 131 L.Ed.2d 999 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Santiago v. Commissioner of Correction
See Casey v. Lewis, 43 F.3d 1261, 1267 (9th Cir. 1994), cert. granted, 514 U.S. 1126 , 115 S. Ct. 1997 , 131 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Christopher v. Gomez
See Casey v. Lewis, 43 F.3d 1261, 1266 (9th Cir.1994), cert. granted, 115 S.Ct. 1997 (1995). 10 Here, Christopher alleged that he was denied the right of access to the courts by defendants' failure to provide secure storage space in cells for the legal materials of double-celled prisoners, and Department of Correction's and prison policies that encourage prisoners to search each others materials and pass the information on to prison officials.
discussed
Cited "see"
Walters v. Edgar
Accord, Casey v. Lewis, 43 F.3d 1261, 1266 (9th Cir.1994), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1997 , 131 L.Ed.2d 999 (1995). 48 Access to the courts means the ability to file a legally sufficient claim, or as stated by one court, “getting the courthouse door opened in such a way that it will not automatically be slammed shut.” Knop v. Johnson, 977 F.2d 996, 1006-07 (6th Cir.1992), cert. denied sub nom., Knop v. McGinnis, — U.S.-, 113 S.Ct. 1415 , 122 L.Ed.2d 786 (1993). 4.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vincent Marquez v. D. Miranda, Correctional Officer C. Wells, Correctional Officer
See, e.g., Casey v. Lewis, 43 F.3d 1261, 1269 (9th Cir.1994), cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 1997 , 131 L.Ed.2d 999 (1995); cf. Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 575-77 , 94 S.Ct. 2963, 2984-85 , 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vukadinovich v. McCarthy
Compare Sandlin v. Corporate Interiors, Inc., 972 F.2d 1212, 1216 (10th Cir.1992), and Skevofilax v. Quigley, 810 F.2d 378, 384-85 (3d Cir.1987) (en banc), with Berry v. McLemore, 795 F.2d 452, 455-56 (5th Cir.1986), and Thomas v. Peacock, 39 F.3d 493, 501 (4th Cir.1994), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1997 , 131 L.Ed.2d 999 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vukadinovich v. Mccarthy
Compare Sandlin v. Corporate Interiors, Inc., 972 F.2d 1212, 1216 (10th Cir.1992), and Skevofilax v. Quigley, 810 F.2d 378, 384-85 (3d Cir.1987) (en banc), with Berry v. McLemore, 795 F.2d 452, 455-56 (5th Cir.1986), and Thomas v. Peacock, 39 F.3d 493, 501 (4th Cir.1994), cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 1997 , 131 L.Ed.2d 999 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CITIZENS BANK OF MARYLAND
v.
David STRUMPF
v.
David STRUMPF
No. 94-1340.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 22, 1995.
Cited by 25 opinions | Published
The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as ami-cus curiae and for divided argument is granted.