green
Positive treatment
2.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Ghotra ex rel. Ghotra v. Bandila Shipping, Inc.
See Craig v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 19 F.3d 472, 476 (9th Cir.) (“where a federal court has an independent basis of jurisdiction over cases involving admiralty claims, such as diversity of citizenship, both the defendant and plaintiff have a right to demand a jury trial under the Seventh Amendment so long as the suit is one that could traditionally have been brought ‘at common law.’”), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 875 , 115 S.Ct. 203 , 130 L.Ed.2d 133 (1994); Wilmington Trust, 934 F.2d at 1029 (“The ‘savings-to-suitors’ clause establishes the right of a party to choose whether to proc…
discussed
Cited "see"
Erica Kaur Ghotra, Minor, by Susan Ghotra Her Guardian Ad Litem Ravinder Singh Ghotra, Minor, by Susan Ghotra, His Guardian Ad Litem Susan Ghotra, an Individual, and as Administratrix of the Estate of Kuldip S. Ghotra Amolak Singh Ghotra and Sarjit Kaur Ghotra v. Bandila Shipping, Inc. \M/v Gracious\"
See Craig v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 19 F.3d 472, 476 (9th Cir.) ("where a federal court has an independent basis of jurisdiction over cases involving admiralty claims, such as diversity of citizenship, both the defendant and plaintiff have a right to demand a jury trial under the Seventh Amendment so long as the suit is one that could traditionally have been brought 'at common law.' "), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 875 , 115 S.Ct. 203 , 130 L.Ed.2d 133 (1994); Wilmington Trust, 934 F.2d at 1029 ("The 'savings-to-suitors' clause establishes the right of a party to choose whether to proceed within th…
cited
Cited "see"
Dayton Haworth v. State of Nevada, Dayton Haworth v. State of Nevada
Accord Fegley v. Higgins, 19 F.3d 1126, 1135 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 203 , 130 L.Ed.2d 134 (1994); Cox v. Brookshire Grocery Co., 919 F.2d 354, 358 (5th Cir.1990) (dicta).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cowan v. Treetop Enterprises, Inc.
As to whether Mr. Shaub is an employer under the FLSA, under 29 U.S.C. § 203 (d), the FLSA defines an “employer” to include “any person acting directly or indirectly in the interest of an employer in relation to an employee.” In Dole v. Elliott Travel & Tours, Inc., 942 F.2d 962, 965 (6th Cir.1991), this Circuit utilized the “economic reality” test on whether a party is an employer: “a corporate officer with operational control of a corporation’s covered enterprise is an employer along with the corporation, jointly and severally liable under the FLSA for unpaid wages.” Id. (…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Coffey v. Dobbs International Services, Inc.
See, e.g., Parke-Hayden, Inc. v. Loews Theatre Management Corp., 1993 WL 287815 , at *2 (S.D.N.Y.) (“The court should grant judgment as a matter of law if the charge creates substantial and ineradicable doubt about whether the jury has been properly guided in its deliberations.”) (citing Pierce v. Ramsey Winch Co., 753 F.2d 416, 425 (5th Cir.1985)), aff'd, 22 F.3d 1091 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 513 U.S. 875 , 115 S.Ct. 203 , 130 L.Ed.2d 133 (1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kile
v.
Appellate Department, Superior Court of California, County of Placer (Trepantis, Real Party in Interest)
v.
Appellate Department, Superior Court of California, County of Placer (Trepantis, Real Party in Interest)
No. 94-198.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1994.
Published
Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.