green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.8 score
“applicable nonbankruptcy law" in 11 u.s.c. 108 (c) means "other federal or state law”
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Nolan
applicable nonbankruptcy law" in 11 u.s.c. 108 (c) means "other federal or state law
discussed
Cited "see"
U.S. Lines, Inc. v. U.S. Lines Reorganization Trust
See Rogers v. Corrosion Products, Inc., 42 F.3d 292, 297 (5th Cir.) (“Because a party may not file suit during the duration of the stay, the 30-day period becomes the only functional period in which to commence a suit.”), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1160 , 115 S.Ct. 2614 , 132 L.Ed.2d 857 (1995); New Pentax Film, Inc. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 936 F.Supp. 142, 146 (S.D.N.Y.1996) (“[section 108(c) ] does not serve to toll the applicable non-bankruptcy law’s statute of limitations ....”) (citing Aslanidis).
discussed
Cited "see"
U.S. Fleet Services, Inc. v. City of Fort Worth
See Rogers v. Corrosion Prods., Inc., 42 F.3d 292, 295 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1160 , 115 S.Ct. 2614 , 132 L.Ed.2d 857 (1995). 6 This Court is not permitted to do merely what it thinks best, but it must do what it thinks the Texas Supreme Court would deem best.
discussed
Cited "see"
Taeger v. CATHOLIC FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVS.
See Tyler v. Children’s Home Soc’y of Cal., 29 Cal. App.4th 511, 527 , 35 Cal.Rptr.2d 291, 299 (Cal.App.1994), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1160 , 115 S.Ct. 2614 , 132 L.Ed.2d 857 (1995). *290 ¶ 10 “In determining whether a jury instruction is justified, we must view the evidence in the strongest manner supporting the theory of the party requesting the instruction.
discussed
Cited "see"
Samuel J. Gersh v. Phar-Mor, Inc.
See Rogers v. Corrosion Products, Inc., 42 F.3d 292, 297 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 2614 (1995); Aslanidis v. United States Lines, Inc., 7 F.3d 1067, 1072-73 (2d Cir.1993); Easley, 990 F.2d at 912 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Worthy v. Collagen Corp.
(2×)
Accord, Martello v. Ciba Vision Corp., 42 F.3d 1167, 1168 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 2614 , 132 L.Ed.2d 857 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nova Bennett, Personal Representative of the Estate of Elden Bennett, Deceased v. United States Lines, Inc.
The bankruptcy section only calls for applicable time deadlines to be extended for 30 days after notice of the termination of a bankruptcy stay.” Id.; accord, e.g., Rogers v. Corrosion Prods., Inc., 42 F.3d 292, 297 , 297 & n. 6 (5th Cir.) (holding “that § 108(c) does not create a separate tolling provision” and collecting cases), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 2614 , 132 L.Ed.2d 857 (1995); Moser v. Universal Engineering Corp., 11 F.3d 720, 722 (7th Cir.1993) (products liability suit dismissed during pendency of bankruptcy stay was untimely if not refiled within 30 days of stay bei…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
R.F. v. Abbott Laboratories
See, e.g., Martello v. Ciba Vision Corp., 42 F.3d 1167, 1169 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1161 , 115 S.Ct. 2614 , 132 L.Ed.2d 857 (1985); Stamps v. Collagen Corp., 984 F.2d 1416, 1421-22 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 824 , 114 S.Ct. 86 , 126 L.Ed.2d 54 (1993); Fry v. Allergan Med.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Montoya v. Mentor Corp.
See, e.g., Martello v. Ciba Vision Corp., 42 F.3d 1167, 1169 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 2614 , 132 L.Ed.2d 857 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Collins v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.
We further note that Class I devices are considered by the FDA as posing little threat to the public and, therefore, are “subject to only general requirements concerned with their manufacture.” Kennedy v. Collagen Corp., 67 F.3d 1453, 1455 (9th Cir.1995); see also Martello v. Ciba Vision Corp., 42 F.3d 1167, 1168 (8th Cir.1994) (Class I devices “are the most loosely regulated and are subjected only to general controls”), cer t. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 2614 , 132 L.Ed.2d 857 (1995). 3 Although defendants may be correct that the “interests” plaintiffs assert concerning safety o…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Duvall v. Bristol-Myers-Squibb
See, e.g., Martello v. Ciba Vision Corp., 42 F.3d 1167, 1168 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 2614 , 132 L.Ed.2d 857 (1995); National Bank of Commerce, 38 F.3d at 997 ; Stamps, 984 F.2d at 1424 n. 8; cf. Mendes, 18 F.3d at 16 (relying in part on Sec. 808.1(d) without explicitly determining that it is a reasonable interpretation of Sec. 360k).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Duvall v. Bristol-Myers-Squibb Co.
See, e.g., Martello v. Ciba Vision Corp., 42 F.3d 1167, 1168 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 2614 , 132 L.Ed.2d 857 (1995); National Bank of Commerce, 38 F.3d at 997 ; Stamps, 984 F.2d at 1424 n. 8; cf. Mendes, 18 F.3d at 16 (relying in part on § 808.1(d) without explicitly determining that it is a reasonable interpretation of § 360k).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Celeste ROGERS, et vir
v.
CORROSION PRODUCTS, INC.
v.
CORROSION PRODUCTS, INC.
No. 94-1830.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 26, 1995.
115 S. Ct. 2614
Published
Citer courts: M.D. Tennessee (1)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.