green
Positive treatment
4.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Vincent C. Donovan v. Alberto Gonzales
See United States v. Donovan, 24 F.3d 908 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 905 , 115 S.Ct. 269 , 130 L.Ed.2d 187 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rivera
See U.S. v. Lewis, 24 F.3d 79, 81 (10th Cir.1994), cert. denied 513 U.S. 905 , 115 S.Ct. 271 , 130 L.Ed.2d 189 (1994) (finding consent to search passenger’s luggage in trunk when driver’s consent was "framed in general terms (extending to the entire trunk and its contents),” the officer had no way to determine who owned the luggage, and the passenger did not interpose any contemporaneous objection to the search of his bag); United States v. McRae, 81 F.3d 1528, 1537-38 (10th Cir.1996) (a defendant’s consent to search the car and trunk included lifting up carpeting in the trunk of the c…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cicero, Kendrick A.
See United States v. Cicero, 22 F.3d 1156 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 905 , 115 S.Ct. 270 , 130 L.Ed.2d 188 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bailey
See United States v. Lewis, 24 F.3d 79, 82 (10th Cir.), cert, denied 513 U.S. 905 , 115 S.Ct. 271 , 130 L.Ed.2d 189 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lewis
See United States v. Lewis, 24 F.3d 79 -2- (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 905 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Christopher Columbus Lewis
See United States v. Lewis, 24 F.3d 79 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 905 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rosalyn Motley v. United States
See, e.g., Krueger v. Saiki, 19 F.3d 1285, 1286 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 905 , 115 S.Ct. 269 , 130 L.Ed.2d 187 (1994); Slaaten v. United States, 990 F.2d 1038 , 1043 n. 5 (8th Cir.1993); Arigo v. United States, 980 F.2d 1159, 1161 (8th Cir.1992).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Evans v. Rudy-Luther Toyota, Inc.
See, e.g., Krueger v. Saiki, 19 F.3d 1285, 1286 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 905 , 115 S.Ct. 269 , 130 L.Ed.2d 187 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Calhoun County Texas v. United States
See, e.g., Fadem v. United States, 52 F.3d 202 (9th Cir.1995) (holding that statute of limitations under QTA is not jurisdictional), vacated — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1103 , 137 L.Ed.2d 306 , orig. opinion reinstated 113 F.3d 167 (9th Cir. 1997); see also Krueger v. Saiki, 19 F.3d 1285, 1286 (8th Cir.) (“Because suits against the government are subject to equitable tolling, compliance with [Federal Tort Claims Act] limitations period is not a jurisdictional prerequisite to suing the government.”), cert. denied 513 U.S. 905 , 115 S.Ct. 269 , 130 L.Ed.2d 187 (1994); Schmidt v. United States, 933…
Cicero
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 94-5525.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1994.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.