discussed Cited "see" State v. Anaya (2×) See State v. Ogden, 118 N.M. 234 , 880 P.2d 845 , cert. denied, 513 U.S. 936 , 115 S.Ct. 336 , 130 L.Ed.2d 294 (1994).

discussed Cited "see" State v. Nelson See State v. Ogden, 118 N.M. 234, 242 , 880 P.2d 845, 853 (1994), (“[W]ords of a statute, including terms not statutorily defined, should be given their ordinary meaning absent clear and express legislative intention to the contrary.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 336 , 130 L.Ed.2d 294 (1994). “[I]f the meaning of a statute is truly clear — not vague, uncertain, ambiguous, or otherwise doubtful — it is ... [our] responsibility ... to apply the statute as written and not to second-guess the legislature’s selection from among competing policies or ... legislative objective[s]…