green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fausto Cruz-Acevedo
See United States v. Ledezma, 26 F.3d 636, 644 (6th Cir.) (the government bears the burden of establishing the factors supporting enhancement by a preponderance of the evidence), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 349 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Chauncy Gray
See United States v. Ledezma, 26 F.3d 636, 640 (6th Cir.) (agreement is essence of conspiracy), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 349 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Garrett Lee Russell
See generally United States v. Ledezma, 26 F.3d 636, 646 (6th Cir.) (“According to the guidelines, a defendant is accountable for all quantities of drugs with which he was directly involved and, in the case of joint criminal activity, all reasonably foreseeable quantities.”), cer t. denied, - U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 349 , 130 L.Ed.2d 305 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Terry Zajac
See United States v. Ledezma, 26 F.3d 636 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 349 , 130 L.Ed.2d 305 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Von Dale Massey, Sr., United States of America v. Sandra Wilkins, United States of America v. Jack Z. Wilkins
See United States v. Ledezma, 26 F.3d 636, 645 (6th Cir.) (remanding on the ground that “[ujnless, by its findings, a trial court identifies the testimony it finds perjurious either explicitly or be reference to its context, we are unable to discharge our appellate responsibility to determine whether the court’s findings are clearly erroneous”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 349 , 130 L.Ed.2d 305 (1994). 13 In this case, the district court failed to give us any idea as to what specific testimony it concluded was perjurious.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Branham
(2×)
Id.; see also United States v. Ledezma, 26 F.3d 636, 644-45 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 942 , 115 S.Ct. 349 , 130 L.Ed.2d 305 (1994).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Branham
Id.; see also United States v. Ledezma, 26 F.3d 636, 644-45 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 349 , 130 L.Ed.2d 305 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Clodoveo Hughes
Once the government proves that a conspiracy existed, " '[t]he connection of the defendant to the conspiracy need only be slight, if there is sufficient evidence to establish that connection beyond a reasonable doubt.' " Christian, 786 F.2d at 211 (quoting United States v. Batimana, 623 F.2d 1366, 1368 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1038 (1980)); see also United States v. DeFranco, 30 F.3d 664, 668 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 349 (1994).
Zajac
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 94-5995.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 11, 1994.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.