green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Allotey v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
See above. “[A] state prisoner seeking federal habeas corpus relief, who fails to raise his federal constitution claim in state court, or who attempts to raise it in a manner not permitted by state procedural rules is barred from pursuing the same claim in federal court absent a showing of cause for and actual prejudice from the default.” Alderman v. Zant, 22 F.3d 1541, 1549 (11th Cir.) (citations omitted) (emphasis added), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1061 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Gollehon v. State
See Alderman v. Zant, 22 F.3d 1541, 1555 (11th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1061 , 115 S. Ct. 673 , 130 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Fred Louis Lamp v. State of Iowa Director, Division of Adult Corrections County Attorney in and for Polk County
See Lowe-Bey v. Groose, 28 F.3d 816, 818 (8th Cir.) (“The failure to raise the ineffective assistance claims in an appeal from the denial of [post-conviction] relief raises a procedural bar to pursuing those claims in federal court.”), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1061 , 115 S.Ct. 674 , 180 L.Ed.2d 606 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fred Louis Lamp v. State of IA
See Lowe-Bey v. Groose, 28 F.3d 816, 818 (8th Cir.) ("The failure to raise the ineffective assistance claims in an appeal from the denial of [post-conviction] relief raises a procedural bar to pursuing those claims in federal court."), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1061 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Walid Khalife Fred Abdenour Goldcorp, Inc.
Id. (citing Minarik, 875 F.2d at 1187, 1194 ); accord United States v. Goulding, 26 F.3d 656, 663 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1061 , 115 S.Ct. 673 , 130 L.Ed.2d 605 (1994); United States v. Hurley, 957 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.), cert. denied 506 U.S. 817 , 113 S.Ct. 60 , 121 L.Ed.2d 28 (1992); United States v. Harmas, 974 F.2d 1262, 1267 (11th Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
West v. Allen
See also Alderman v. Zant, 22 F.3d 1541, 1549-51 (11th Cir. 1994) (where a Georgia habeas corpus court found that the petitioner’s claims were procedurally barred as successive, but also noted that the claims lack merit based on the evidence, “this ruling in the alternative did not have an effect ... of blurring the clear determination by the [Georgia habeas corpus] court that the allegations was procedurally barred”), cert, denied, 513 U.S. 1061 , 115 S.Ct. 673 , 130 L.Ed.2d 606 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bailey v. Nagle
(2×)
See also Alderman v. Zant, 22 F.3d 1541, 1549-51 (11th Cir.) (where a Georgia habeas corpus court found that the petitioner’s claims were procedurally barred as successive, but also noted that the claims lacked merit based on the evidence, “[tjhis ruling in the alternative did not have the effect ... of blurring the clear determination by the [Georgia habeas corpus] court that the allegation was procedurally barred”), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1061 , 115 S.Ct. 673 , 130 L.Ed.2d 606 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bailey v. Nagle
See also Alderman v. Zant, 22 F.3d 1541, 1549-51 (11th Cir.) (where a Georgia habeas corpus court found that the petitioner$s claims were procedurally barred as successive, but also noted that the claims lacked merit based on the evidence, “[t]his ruling in the alternative did not have the effect . . . of blurring the clear determination by the [Georgia habeas corpus] court that the allegation was procedurally barred”), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1061 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David A. Dashney
Compare United States v. Marder, 48 F.3d 564, 574 (1st Cir.) (finding error where the district court instructed the jury that "the Government has to prove ... [the structuring] was done willfully, that is, that the defendant knew of the reporting requirement and that the structuring had the purpose of evading the requirement”), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1056 , 115 S.Ct. 1441 , 131 L.Ed.2d 320 (1995) with United States v. Goulding, 26 *1202 F.3d 656, 668-69 (7th Cir.) (finding compliance with Ratzlaf where the district court instructed the jury that "[a]n act is done willfully if done voluntaril…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hunes
v.
Arkansas
v.
Arkansas
No. 94-6488.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 12, 1994.
513 U.S. 1061
Published
Sup. Ct. Ark. Certio-rari denied.