green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
A.W. v. Humble Independent School District
(2×)
See Doe v. Taylor I.S.D., 15 F.3d 443, 451-52 (5th Cir.1994) (en banc), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 815 , 115 S.Ct. 70 , 130 L.Ed.2d 25 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Shipp v. McMahon
See Doe v. Independent School Dist., 15 F.3d 443, 455 (5th Cir 1994)(en banc), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 815 , 115 S.Ct. 70 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shipp v. McMahon
(2×)
See Doe v. Taylor Independent School Dist., 15 F.3d 443, 455 (5th Cir1994)(en banc), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 815 , 115 S.Ct. 70 , 130 L.Ed.2d 25 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
West v. State
See Simmons v. State, 333 Md. 547 , 636 A.2d 463 , cert. denied, 513 U.S. 815 , 115 S.Ct. 70 , 130 L.Ed.2d 26 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Baldwin Construction Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the State
See Rosa v. Warner Electrical Contracting, 870 P.2d 1210 (Colo.1994), (cert. den’d, 513 U.S. 814 , 115 S.Ct. 69 , 130 L.Ed.2d 25 (1994)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Armstrong v. Lamy
(2×)
See Doe v. Taylor Independent School Dist., 15 F.3d 443, 445 (5th Cir.1994) (en banc) (holding that “schoolchildren do have a liberty interest in their bodily integrity that is protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and that physical sexual abuse by a school employee violates that right”), cert. denied sub nom, Lankford v. Doe, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 70 , 130 L.Ed.2d 25 (1994); Stoneking v. Bradford Area School Dist., 882 F.2d 720 , 727 (3rd Cir.1989) (student’s “right to bodily integrity under the Due Process Clause [encompasses] a student’s right to be free …
discussed
Cited "see"
Tyler v. State
See Simmons v. State, 333 Md. 547, 559, 636 A.2d 463, 469 (witness who refused to testify was “unavailable” for purposes of hearsay exception), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 70 , 130 L.Ed.2d 26 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Becerra v. Asher
(2×)
See Doe v. Taylor Ind. School Dist., 15 F.3d 443, 451 (5th Cir.1994), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 70 , 130 L.Ed.2d 25 (1994) (Constitution protects schoolchildren from state-occasioned physical sexual abuse and physical discipline that is arbitrary, capricious, or wholly unrelated to legitimate state interests).
cited
Cited "see"
Zofia Pupek v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Id.; see Ayuda, Inc. v. Reno, 7 F.3d 246, 250 (D.C.Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 70 , 130 L.Ed.2d 26 (1994). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ariel Osvalod Orquera Aldo Agustin Orquera Gladis Mabel Orquera Ariadna Brenda Orquera v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General
See, e.g., Ayuda, Inc. v. Thornburgh, 948 F.2d 742, 759-60 (D.C.Cir.1991), judgment vacated, 509 U.S. 916 , 113 S.Ct. 3026 , 125 L.Ed.2d 714 (1993), on remand to, 7 F.3d 246 (D.C.Cir.1993), ce rt. denied, 513 U.S. 815 , 115 S.Ct. 70 , 130 L.Ed.2d 26 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Topazov v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service
Deferring to “the congressional intent of locating alien status disputes in administrative agencies and not the federal courts,” and recognizing that either an immigration judge or the Board of Immigration Appeals could potentially decide that Mr. Wang’s mode of entry precluded jurisdiction and dismiss his case, the court concluded that “the question of jurisdiction must first be litigated in the exclusion proceedings themselves.” Id. at 154-55 (quoting Loya v. INS, 583 F.2d 1110 , 1114 (9th Cir.1979)); see also Ayuda, Inc. v. Reno, 7 F.3d 246 , 249 n. 8 (D.C.Cir.1993) (“Ayuda III"…
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Henderson v. Romer
(4×)
See also Doe v. Taylor Independent School District, 15 F.3d 443 (5th Cir.), (en banc) cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 70 , 130 L.Ed.2d 25 (1994) (§ 1983 claim lies for substantive due process violation under “special relationship” exception to DeShaney when school official acts with deliberate indifference to students’ rights).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Shong-Ching Tong
v.
Assured Thrift & Loan Assn.
v.
Assured Thrift & Loan Assn.
No. 93-1917.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1994.
Cited by 127 opinions | Published
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.