Young v. Wisconsin, 513 U.S. 1098 (1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Young v. Wisconsin, 513 U.S. 1098 (1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
68 citation events (14 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. David Brian Bern (ca8, 2004-05-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. David Brian Bern
8th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Johnson, 28 F.3d 1487,1498 (8th Cir.1994) (reviewing for abuse of discretion district court’s decision to admit or exclude evidence), ce rt. denied, 513 U.S. 1098 , 115 S.Ct. 768 , 130 L.Ed.2d 664 (1995).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Christopher Scott and Johnny Ray Butler
8th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Johnson, 28 F.3d 1487 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1098 , 115 S.Ct. 768 , 130 L.Ed.2d 664 (1995), 513 U.S. 1195 , 115 S.Ct. 1263 , 131 L.Ed.2d 142 (1995).
cited Cited "see" Willie Ervin Fisher v. R. C. Lee, Warden, Central Prison North Carolina Attorney General
4th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fisher v. North Carolina, 513 U.S. 1098 , 115 S.Ct. 768 , 130 L.Ed.2d 665 (1995).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Martha Gonzales
8th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. John E. Irvin and Thomas E. Pastor
7th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Johnson, 28 F.3d 1487, 1497-98 (8th Cir.1994), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 768 , 130 L.Ed.2d 664 (1995) (holding gang membership admissible because “it did not substitute for evidence of actual participation in the drug distribution conspiracy”); Thomas, 86 F.3d at 653-54 (same). 8 This considerable danger of unfair prejudice more than substantially outweighed the minimal probative value of the motorcycle gang evidence admitted.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Oscar Orlando Rivas
5th Cir. · 1996 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord United States v. Speer, 30 F.3d 605, 612 (5th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 768 , 130 L.Ed.2d 664 (1995); *196 United States v. Ruiz, 986 F.2d 905, 910 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 145 , 126 L.Ed.2d 107 (1993).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Michael D. Murphy
8th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Johnson, 28 F.3d 1487, 1494-95 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 768 , 130 L.Ed.2d 664 (1995). “[T]he proper standard in this case is whether the state officials complied with [Missouri] law and the Fourth Amendment....” United States v. Moore, 956 F.2d at 848 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Donald A. Hellbusch
8th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Johnson, 28 F.3d 1487, 1494-95 (8th Cir. 1994), cert denied, 115 S. Ct. 768 (1995), and, petition for cert. filed, No. 94-7741 (U.S. Jan. 17, 1995).
discussed Cited "see" UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. OSCAR ORLANDO RIVAS
unknown court · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord United States v. Speer, 30 F.3d 605, 612 (5th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, __ U.S. __, 115 S.Ct. 768 (1995); United States v. Ruiz, 986 F.2d 905, 910 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, __ U.S. __, 114 S.Ct. 145 (1993).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Morrison (2×)
N.J. · 2006 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Speer, 30 F. 3d 605, 609 (5th Cir.1994) (stating that court "need not pass on the validity of the Swiderski doctrine" because it was "undisputed that at least some of the cocaine was intended ... to be subsequently distributed to [a person] who was not at or near the scene of the transaction"), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1028 , 115 S.Ct. 603 , 130 L.Ed. 2d 514 (1994), and cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1098 , 115 S.Ct. 768 , 130 L.Ed. 2d 664 (1995); Long v. United States, 623 A. 2d 1144, 1150-51 (D.C.1993) (declining government's "invitation to reject Swiderski as incorrectly d…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Leonard D. Triplett
8th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Johnson, 28 F.3d 1487, 1496-97 (8th Cir.1994) (“when determining the admissibility of expert testimony, the relevant inquiry is whether [the expert’s] testimony would be ‘helpful’ to the jury’s understanding of the evidence”) (citing Dauberi, 509 U.S. at 597 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 ), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1098 , 115 S.Ct. 768 , 130 L.Ed.2d 664 (1995).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Antonio M. Smart
D.C. Cir. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Speer, 30 F.3d 605, 610 (5th Cir.1994) (interpreting United States v. Dotson, 817 F.2d 1127 (5th Cir.1987), aff'd in pertinent part on reh'g, 821 F.2d 1034 (1987), to stand for the proposition that "Rule 704(b) is not strictly construed and prohibits only a direct statement of the defendant’s intent”) (citations omitted), ce rt. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 768 , 130 L.Ed.2d 664 (1995); United States v. Hunter, 95 F.3d 14, 16, 17 (8th Cir.1996) (upholding expert testimony that a 14.76 gram quantity of cocaine base " ‘would definitely be involved in distribution v…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Stephanie Cannon (2×)
8th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Johnson, 28 F.3d 1487, 1494 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 768 , 130 L.Ed.2d 664 (1995), and Scott v. United States, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1263 , 131 L.Ed.2d 142 (1995); United States v. Maxwell, 25 F.3d 1389, 1396-97 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 610 , 130 L.Ed.2d 519 (1994); United States v. Buckner, 894 F.2d 975, 978-81 (8th Cir.1990).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Stephanie Cannon, Also Known as Stephanie Lynch, United States of America v. Keith Anthony Cannon, United States of America v. Stephanie Cannon, Also Known as Stephanie Lynch, United States of America v. Keith Anthony Cannon
8th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Johnson, 28 F.3d 1487, 1494 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 768 , 130 L.Ed.2d 664 (1995), and Scott v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 1263 , 131 L.Ed.2d 142 (1995); United States v. Maxwell, 25 F.3d 1389, 1396-97 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 610 , 130 L.Ed.2d 519 (1994); United States v. Buckner, 894 F.2d 975, 978-81 (8th Cir.1990).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Paese v. United States
S.D.N.Y. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Speer, 30 F.3d 605, 612 (5th Cir.1994) (affirming conviction for possessing firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g) on ground that defendant who drove car had constructive possession of passenger’s firearm), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 768 , 130 L.Ed.2d 664 (1995); United States v. Boykin, 986 F.2d 270 (8th Cir.1993) (conviction for violating § 922(g) “may be based on constructive or joint possession of the firearm”), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 888 , 114 S.Ct. 241 , 126 L.Ed.2d 195 (1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Young
v.
Wisconsin
No. 94-6955.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1995.
513 U.S. 1098
Published

Ct. App. Wis. Certio-rari denied.