discussed Cited "see" United States v. Ricardo Morales, AKA \Ichi See United States v. Atehortva, 69 F.3d 679, 685 (2d Cir.1995) (“When a defendant challenges convictions on particular counts that are inextricably tied to other counts in determining the sentencing range under the guidelines, the defendant assumes the risk of undoing the intricate knot of calculations should he succeed.”), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1249 , 116 S.Ct. 2510 , 135 L.Ed.2d 199 (1996); cf. United States v. Mata, 133 F.3d 200, 202 (2d Cir.1998) (per curiam) (finding no double jeopardy or due process violation where vacatur of the petitioner’s conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c) …

cited Cited "see" United States v. Ramon Medina Molina See United States v. Molina, 75 F.3d 600 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1249 , 116 S.Ct. 2510 , 135 L.Ed.2d 199 (1996).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Popovic However, “when a sentence has been vacated, the defendant is placed in the same position as if he had never been sentenced.” United States v. Maldonado, 996 F.2d 598, 599 (2d Cir.1993); see also United States v. Atehortva, 69 F.3d 679, 685 (2d Cir.1995) (“[T]he resentencing proceeding was appropriately treated as a de novo sentencing, for the remand did not specifically limit the scope of resentencing.”), cert. denied sub nom., Correa v. United States, 517 U.S. 1249 , 116 S.Ct. 2510 , 135 L.Ed.2d 199 (1996).