green
Positive treatment
1.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Ventspils Nafta v. Feniks International House of Trade (U.S.A.) Inc.
See GICC Capital Corp. v. Technology Finance Group, 67 F.3d 463 , 465 (2d Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct. 2547 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1996) (citing Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232 , 94 S.Ct. 1683 , 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Asdourian v. Konstantin
Section 1962 prohibits, under subsections (a) through (d), the following: (a) the use of income “derived ... from a pattern of racketeering activity” to acquire an interest in, establish, or operate an enterprise engaged in or whose activities affect interstate commerce; (b) the acquisition of any interest in or control of such an enterprise “through a pattern or racketeering activity”; (c) the conduct or participation in the conduct of such an enterprise’s affairs “through a pattern of racketeering activity”; and (d) conspiring to do any of the above. 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962 (a)-(d)…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arizona Premium Finance, Inc. v. Bielli
Section 1962 prohibits, under subsections (a) through (d), the following: (a) the use of income “derived ... from a pattern of racketeering activity” to acquire an interest in, establish, or operate an enterprise engaged in or whose activities affect interstate commerce; (b) the acquisition of any interest in or control of such an enterprise “through a pattern or racketeering activity”; (c) the conduct or participation in the conduct of such an enterprise’s affairs “through a pattern of racketeering activity”; and (d) conspiring to do any of the above. 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962 (a)-(d)…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Economic Opportunity Commission of Nassau County, Inc. v. County of Nassau, Inc.
Section 1962 prohibits, under subsections (a) through (d), the following: (a) the use of income “derived ... from a pattern of racketeering activity” to acquire an interest in, establish, or operate an enterprise engaged in or whose activities affect interstate commerce; (b) the acquisition of any interest in or control of such an enterprise “through a pattern or racketeering activity”; (c) the conduct or participation in the conduct of such an enterprise’s affairs “through a pattern of racketeering activity”; and (d) conspiring to do any of the above. 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962 (a)—(…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Roberto's Fruit Market, Inc. v. Schaffer
Section 1962 prohibits, under subsections (a) through (d), the following: (a) the use of income “derived ... from a pattern of racketeering activity” to acquire an interest in, establish, or operate an enterprise engaged in or whose activities affect interstate commerce; (b) the acquisition of any interest in or control of such an enterprise “through a pattern or racketeering activity”; (c) the conduct or participation in the conduct of such an enterprise’s affairs *398 “through a pattern of racketeering activity”, and (d) conspiring to do any of the above. 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (a)-…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carroll et ux.
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. 95-1601.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 24, 1996.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.