Carroll v. Comm'r, 518 U.S. 1017 (1996). · Go Syfert
Carroll v. Comm'r, 518 U.S. 1017 (1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
38 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ventspils Nafta v. Feniks International House of Trade (U.S.A.) Inc. (nyed, 1996-07-02)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Ventspils Nafta v. Feniks International House of Trade (U.S.A.) Inc.
E.D.N.Y · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See GICC Capital Corp. v. Technology Finance Group, 67 F.3d 463 , 465 (2d Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct. 2547 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1996) (citing Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232 , 94 S.Ct. 1683 , 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Asdourian v. Konstantin
E.D.N.Y · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
Section 1962 prohibits, under subsections (a) through (d), the following: (a) the use of income “derived ... from a pattern of racketeering activity” to acquire an interest in, establish, or operate an enterprise engaged in or whose activities affect interstate commerce; (b) the acquisition of any interest in or control of such an enterprise “through a pattern or racketeering activity”; (c) the conduct or participation in the conduct of such an enterprise’s affairs “through a pattern of racketeering activity”; and (d) conspiring to do any of the above. 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962 (a)-(d)…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Arizona Premium Finance, Inc. v. Bielli
E.D.N.Y · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
Section 1962 prohibits, under subsections (a) through (d), the following: (a) the use of income “derived ... from a pattern of racketeering activity” to acquire an interest in, establish, or operate an enterprise engaged in or whose activities affect interstate commerce; (b) the acquisition of any interest in or control of such an enterprise “through a pattern or racketeering activity”; (c) the conduct or participation in the conduct of such an enterprise’s affairs “through a pattern of racketeering activity”; and (d) conspiring to do any of the above. 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962 (a)-(d)…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Economic Opportunity Commission of Nassau County, Inc. v. County of Nassau, Inc.
E.D.N.Y · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
Section 1962 prohibits, under subsections (a) through (d), the following: (a) the use of income “derived ... from a pattern of racketeering activity” to acquire an interest in, establish, or operate an enterprise engaged in or whose activities affect interstate commerce; (b) the acquisition of any interest in or control of such an enterprise “through a pattern or racketeering activity”; (c) the conduct or participation in the conduct of such an enterprise’s affairs “through a pattern of racketeering activity”; and (d) conspiring to do any of the above. 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962 (a)—(…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Roberto's Fruit Market, Inc. v. Schaffer
E.D.N.Y · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
Section 1962 prohibits, under subsections (a) through (d), the following: (a) the use of income “derived ... from a pattern of racketeering activity” to acquire an interest in, establish, or operate an enterprise engaged in or whose activities affect interstate commerce; (b) the acquisition of any interest in or control of such an enterprise “through a pattern or racketeering activity”; (c) the conduct or participation in the conduct of such an enterprise’s affairs *398 “through a pattern of racketeering activity”, and (d) conspiring to do any of the above. 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (a)-…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carroll et ux.
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. 95-1601.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 24, 1996.
518 U.S. 1017
Published

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.