Caudle v. California, 516 U.S. 915 (1995). · Go Syfert
Caudle v. California, 516 U.S. 915 (1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
54 citation events (21 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Miami Tribe of Oklahoma v. United States (ksd, 1996-04-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Miami Tribe of Oklahoma v. United States
D. Kan. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Koch v. United States, 47 F.3d 1015, 1017 (10th Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 303 , 133 L.Ed.2d 208 (1995); Howard v. Federal Aviation Admin., 17 F.3d 1213, 1215 (9th Cir.1994). 3 *1423 C.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." George Phillips Philip Vitale v. Borough of Keyport Victor Rhodes Board of Adjustment (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Blanche Road Corp. v. Bensalem Township, 57 F.3d 253, 268 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct. 303 , 133 L.Ed.2d 208 (1995); DeBlasio v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 53 F.3d 592, 599-601 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct. 352 , 133 L.Ed.2d 247 (1995); Midnight Sessions, Ltd. v. City of Philadelphia, 945 F.2d 667, 683 (3d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 984 , 112 S.Ct. 1668 , 118 L.Ed.2d 389 (1992).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Phillips v. Keyport
3rd Cir. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Blanche Road Corp. v. Bensalem Township, 57 F.3d 253 , 268 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 303 (1995); DeBlasio v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 53 F.3d 592 , 599- 601 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 352 (1995); Midnight Sessions, Ltd. v. City of Philadelphia, 945 F.2d 667, 683 (3d Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 984 (1992).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lee-Patterson v. New Jersey Transit Bus Operations, Inc.
D.N.J. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
The purpose of Section 1983 is “to deter state actors from using the badge of their authority to deprive individuals of their federally guaranteed rights and to provide relief to victims if such deterrence fails.” Wyatt v. Cole, 504 U.S. 158, 161 , 112 S.Ct. 1827, 1830 , 118 L.Ed.2d 504 (1992) (citing Carey v. Piphus, 435 U.S. 247, 254-57 , 98 S.Ct. 1042, 1047-49 , 55 L.Ed.2d 252 (1978)); see also Blanche Road Corp. v. Bensalem Township, 57 F.3d 253, 265 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 303 , 133 L.Ed.2d 208 (1995); Bolden v. SEPTA 21 F.3d 29 , 34 (3d Cir.1994).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Raniero v. Antun
D.N.J. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
The purpose of Section 1983 is “to deter state actors from using the badge, of their authority to deprive individuals of their federally guaranteed rights and to provide relief to victims if such deterrence fails.” Wyatt v. Cole, 504 U.S. 158, 161 , 112 S.Ct. 1827, 1830 , 118 L.Ed.2d 504 (1992) (citing Carey v. Piphus, 435 U.S. 247, 254-57 , 98 S.Ct. 1042, 1047-49 , 55 L.Ed.2d 252 (1978)); see also Blanche Road Corp. v. Bensalem Township, 57 F.3d 253, 265 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 303 , 133 L.Ed.2d 208 (1995); Bolden v. SEPTA 21 F.3d 29 , 34 (3d Cir.1994).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Homar v. Gilbert
3rd Cir. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
"Thus, allegations that the government's actions in a particular case were motivated by bias, bad faith, or improper motive ... may support a finding of substantive due process violation." Id. (citing Bello and Pace Resources ). 103 In Parkway Garage, Inc. v. City of Phil., 5 F.3d 685, 692 (3d Cir.1993), we explained that "[s]ubstantive due process protects citizens from arbitrary and irrational acts of government." Id. at 692 (citing Rogin v. Bensalem Tp., 616 F.2d 680 , 689 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1029 , 101 S.Ct. 1737 , 68 L.Ed.2d 223 (1981)). 7 We then stated the following te…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Homar v. Gilbert (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
We then stated the following test (which is the test quoted by the parties in this case): "A violation of substantive due process rights is proven: (1) if the government's actions were not rationally related to a legitimate interest; or (2) `if the government's actions in a particular case were in fact motivated by bias, bad faith or improper motive.'" Id. (citation omitted); see also Blanche Road Corp. v. Bensalem Tp., 57 F.3d 253, 263 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 303 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Caudle
v.
California
No. 95-252.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1995.
516 U.S. 915
Published

Ct. App. Cal., 5th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.