green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.1 score
“1956(a)(1)(b)(i) does not require an attempt to conceal the identity of the defendant; a scheme that conceals only the source of the funds falls within the purview of the statute.”
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
McCabe v. The City of Lynn
But see Steagald v. United States, 451 U.S. 204 , ___ ___ ________ _____________ 214 (1981) (noting that the "arrest warrant" rule is inapplicable where suspect is within another person's residence). 8 Cir.), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 675 (1995).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Tencer
1956(a)(1)(b)(i) does not require an attempt to conceal the identity of the defendant; a scheme that conceals only the source of the funds falls within the purview of the statute.
cited
Cited "see"
Mason v. Equitable
See Hegler v. Borg, 50 F.3d 1472, 1475 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1029 , 116 S.Ct. 675 , 133 L.Ed.2d 524 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Willie Burns Martanette Alexander Gregory Eugene August Earline Montgomery, United States of America v. Gregory Eugene August
See United States v. Willey, 57 F.3d 1374, 1384 (5th Cir.) (observing that the design requirement distinguishes the crime of money laundering from the innocent act of mere money spending), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1029 , 116 S.Ct. 675 , 133 L.Ed.2d 524 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Texas Workers' Compensation Insurance Fund v. Simon
See Citizens Ass ’n for Sound Energy v. Boltz, 886 S.W.2d 283, 291 (Tex.App.—Amarillo 1994, writ denied), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1029 , 116 S.Ct. 675 , 133 L.Ed.2d 524 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Scott William Johnson v. Ernest C. Roe, Warden, Attorney General
See Hegler v. Borg, 50 F.3d 1472, 1476-77 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 675 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. One 1988 Prevost Liberty Motor Home
See United States v. Willey, 57 F.3d 1374, 1382 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct. 675 , 133 L.Ed.2d 524 (1995); International Shortstop, Inc. v. Rally’s, Inc., 939 F.2d 1257, 1265-66 (5th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1059 , 112 S.Ct. 936 , 117 L.Ed.2d 107 (1992). 37 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Robinson v. Johnson
See Hegarty v. Somerset County, 848 F.Supp. 257, 268 (D.Me.1994), aff'd in part and remanded in part on other grounds, 53 F.3d 1367 (1st Cir.1995), ce rt. denied,-U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 675 , 133 L.Ed.2d 524 (1995); Carmona Pacheco v. Betancourt y Lebrón, 820 F.Supp. 45 (D.P.R.1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wood v. MCC Superintendant
See ___ Hegarty v. Somerset County, 53 F.3d 1367, 1373 (1st Cir.), _______ ________________ cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 675 (1995); Singer v. Maine, 49 F.3d _____ ______ ______ _____ 837, 844 (1st Cir. 1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Wood v. MCC Superintendant
See Hegarty v. Somerset County, 53 F.3d 1367, 1373 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 675 , 133 L.Ed.2d 524 (1995); Singer v. Maine, 49 F.3d 837, 844 (1st Cir.1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tibolt
See Hegarty v. Somerset Cty., 53 F.3d 1367 , 1374 (1st Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 675 , 133 L.Ed.2d 524 (1995); United States v. Zurosky, 614 F.2d 779 , 784 n. 2 (1st Cir.1979) (finding probable cause where police investigated possible “breaking and entering” at warehouse), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 967 , 100 S.Ct. 2945 , 64 L.Ed.2d 826 (1980) (citing Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160, 175-76 , 69 S.Ct. 1302, 1310-11 , 93 L.Ed. 1879 (1949)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Seekamp v. Michaud
Writing for the Court, Justice Scalia explained that a Fourth Amendment seizure occurs "only when there is a governmen- tal termination of freedom of movement through means intentional- _______ _____ ____________ ly applied," id. at 597 ; see also Landol-Rivera v. Cruz Cosme, __ _______ __ ___ ____ _____________ __________ 906 F.2d 791, 795 (1st Cir. 1990) (same), explaining that "it [is] enough for a seizure that a person be stopped by the very instrumentality set in motion or put in place to achieve that ____________________ 4We note that a great many 1983 claims are resolved under the doctr…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Seitz
See, e.g., United States v. Dickler, 64 F.3d 818 (3d Cir.1995)(plea bargain), United States v. Willey, 57 F.3d 1374 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 675 , 133 L.Ed.2d 524 (1995) (director of failed bank). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Patrick James JEFFRIES, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Tana WOOD, Superintendent, Respondent-Appellant
As Justice Holmes noted in Messinger v. Anderson, 225 U.S. 436, 444 , 32 S.Ct. 739, 740 , 56 L.Ed. 1152 (1912), “[I]n the absence of statute the phrase, ‘law of the case’, as applied to the effect of previous orders on the later action of the court rendering them in the same case, merely expresses the practice of courts generally to refuse to reopen what has been decided, not a limit to their power.” “Thus the court may reconsider previously decided questions in cases in which there has been an intervening change of controlling authority, new evidence has surfaced, or the previous di…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Doyle Marshall WILLEY, Sr.
v.
UNITED STATES
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 95-732.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 11, 1995.
Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1)
[*676] Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.