cited Cited "see" State v. Jones See State v. Stokley, 182 Ariz. 505, 524 , 898 P.2d 454, 473 (1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 787 , 133 L.Ed.2d 737 (1996).

cited Cited "see" State v. Gallegos See State v. Stokley, 182 Ariz. 505, 520 , 898 P.2d 454, 469 (1995), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 787 , 133 L.Ed.2d 737 (1996).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Smith v. Stewart See State v. Thornton, 187 Ariz. 325, 334-35 , 929 P.2d 676, 685-86 (1996), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 1706 , 137 L.Ed.2d 831 (1997); see also State v. Stokley, 182 Ariz. 505, 521-22, 524 , 898 P.2d 454, 470-71, 473 (1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1078 , 116 S.Ct. 787 , 133 L.Ed.2d 737 (1996).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Jones Voluntary intoxication may be a mitigating factor if the defendant proves by a preponderance of the evidence that his “capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of his conduct or to conform his conduct to the requirements of law was significantly impaired, but not so impaired as to constitute a defense to prosecution.” A.R.S. § 13-703(G)(1); see also State v. Stokley, 182 Ariz. 505, 520 , 898 P.2d 454, 469 (1995), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 787 , 133 L.Ed.2d 737 (1996).