green
Positive treatment
6.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. King
See United States v. Bush, 70 F.3d 557, 562-63 (10th Cir.1995) (considering, inter alia, defendant's statements in plea agreement and change of plea proceedings in concluding that the object of the charged conspiracy was to distribute cocaine base rather than cocaine powder), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1082 , 116 S.Ct. 795 , 133 L.Ed.2d 743 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bill Fred Hamilton
See United States v. Sherlin, 67 F.3d 1208, 1217 (6th Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 795 , 133 L.Ed.2d 744 (1996). .The statement should not have been admitted into evidence as support for the district court’s conclusion that the receipts should be excluded because they were fabricated.
cited
Cited "see"
Jesionowski v. Beck
See United States v. Sherlin, 67 F.3d 1208, 1216-17 (6 Cir., 1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 795 , 133 L.Ed.2d 744 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frederick Smith
See United States v. Bush, 70 F.3d 557, 562-63 (10th Cir.1995) (sentencing for cocaine base upheld where defendant intended to plead guilty to offense involving cocaine base and indictment charged offense involving cocaine powder "and/or" cocaine base), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 795 (1996). 1 The Honorable Donald J.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frederick Smith
See United States v. Bush, 70 F.3d 557, 562-63 (10th Cir. 1995) (sentencing for cocaine base upheld where defendant intended to plead guilty to offense involving cocaine base and indictment charged offense involving cocaine powder "and/or" cocaine base), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 795 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Meyers v. Arcudi
See United States v. Sherlin, 67 F.3d 1208, 1217 (6th Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 795 , 133 L.Ed.2d 744 (1996) (not abuse of discretion to exclude polygraph test of which prosecution did not have notice).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. McMasters
See United States v. Sherlin, 67 F.3d 1208, 1214 (6th Cir.1995) (under Lopez , Congress did not exceed its Commerce Clause authority in enacting § 844(i)) (arson of a college dormitory), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 795 , 133 L.Ed.2d 744 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles McMasters Jr., United States of America v. Reginald Arline, United States of America v. Steven Johnson, United States of America v. Jimmy Foley
See United States v. Sherlin, 67 F.3d 1208, 1214 (6th Cir.1995) (under Lopez, Congress did not exceed its Commerce Clause authority in enacting § 844(i)) (arson of a college dormitory), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 795 , 133 L.Ed.2d 744 (1996). 12 Defendants contend that, even if facially constitutional, § 844(i) could not be constitutionally applied in this case because the object of the arson conspiracy was a private residence and was thus not in the stream of interstate commerce.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles McMasters
See United States v. Sherlin, 67 F.3d 1208, 1214 (6th Cir. 1995) (under Lopez, Congress did not exceed its Commerce Clause authority in enacting § 844(i)) (arson of a college dormitory), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 795 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lindia
See United States v. Bush, 70 F.3d 557, 561 (10th Cir.1995) (holding that in a multiple-object conspiracy conviction, where it is impossible to tell which controlled substance was the object of conviction, defendant must be sentenced based on objective yielding lowest offense level), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct. 795 , 133 L.Ed.2d 743 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lindia
See United ___ ______ States v. Bush, 70 F.3d 557, 561 (10th Cir. 1995) (holding ______ ____ that in a multiple-object conspiracy conviction, where it is impossible to tell which controlled substance was the object of conviction, defendant must be sentenced based on objective yielding lowest offense level), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 795 _____ ______ (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert Ford, Jr. v. Rodney J. Ahitow, Warden, and Roland W. Burris
See also United States v. Sherlin, 67 F.3d 1208, 1214 (6th Cir.1995) (explaining that, under Jackson , substantial evidence is “more than just a scintilla_ ‘It means such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept to support a conclusion’”) (quoting United States v. Martin, 375 F.2d 956, 957 (6th Cir.1967), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct. 795 , 133 L.Ed.2d 744 (1996)).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Conley
See also United States v. Bush, 70 F.3d 557, 561 (10th Cir.1995), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 795 , 133 L.Ed.2d 743 (1996).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Conley
See also United States v. Bush, 70 F.3d 557, 561 (10th Cir.1995), ce rt. denied, — U.S.—, 116 S.Ct. 795 , 133 L.Ed.2d 743 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Belt
See, e.g,, United States v. Bush, 70 F.3d 557 , 560-61 n. 3 (10th Cir.1995) ("[T]he district court may depart below [§ 841(b)] mandatory minimum sentences where, as here, the government has moved for a downward departure pursuant to USSG § 5K1.1."), cert. denied, -U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 795 , 133 L.Ed.2d 743 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dontay Banks, Mario Dunlap, Michael Wills, Alton Mills, Robert Gaines, Monica Boguille, and Robert Shipp
See, e.g., United States v. Bush, 70 F.3d 557 (10th Cir.1995) (defendant’s indictment for distribution of “cocaine (powder) and/or cocaine base (crack)” held to be ambiguous), cer t. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 795 , 133 L.Ed.2d 743 (1996); United States v. Garcia, 37 F.3d 1359, 1370 (9th Cir.1994) (“Garcia’s jury was charged with determining whether he was guilty of conspiring to commit the narcotics charges or whether he was guilty of conspiring to use communications facilities to facilitate the commission of drug offenses.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1699 , 131 L.Ed…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sherlin
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 95-7049.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 16, 1996.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.