green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Messer
See United States v. Austin, 66 F.3d 1115, 1119 (10th Cir.1995) ("By leaving his bag in the possession and control of [a third party], defendant assumed the risk that [the third party] would allow the authorities access to the bag."), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1084 , 116 S.Ct. 799 , 133 L.Ed.2d 747 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kentasha Sharrie Holley
See United States v. Austin, 66 F.3d 1115, 1118 (10th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1084 , 116 S.Ct. 799 , 133 L.Ed.2d 747 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Salvador M. Andrade
See United States v. Denis-LaMarchez, 64 F.3d 597, 598 (11th Cir. 1995) (per curiam) (because INS Form I-294 is not criminal statute, sentencing in excess of two-year maximum erroneously stated on form does not violate due process or fundamental unfairness), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 799 (1996). -2- Finally, counsel challenges the aggravated-felony enhancement Andrade received, noting that Andrade now insists his Oregon conviction was for mere possession of a controlled substance.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Salvador Maravilla Andrade, Also Known as Luis M. Godoy, Also Known as Salvador Andrade, Also Known as Luis Andrade-Godinez
See United States v. Denis-LaMarchez, 64 F.3d 597, 598 (11th Cir.1995) (per curiam) (because INS Form I-294 is not criminal statute, sentencing in excess of two-year maximum erroneously stated on form does not violate due process or fundamental unfairness), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 799 (1996). 4 Finally, counsel challenges the aggravated-felony enhancement Andrade received, noting that Andrade now insists his Oregon conviction was for mere possession of a controlled substance.
discussed
Cited "see"
Beall v. McGaha
See MacCuish v. United States, 844 F.2d 733, 735 (10th Cir.1988) (holding there is no constitutional right to counsel in a civil action, and noting that malpractice action is appropriate remedy). 8 "The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable government intrusions into their legitimate expectations of privacy." United States v. Austin, 66 F.3d 1115, 1118 (10th Cir.1995) (quotations omitted), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 799 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re: Dale Chimenti, Lizabeth Chimenti, Joey Chimenti, and Stefanie Chimenti
See Servis v. Hiller Systems Inc., 54 F.3d 203, 206-07 (4th Cir.1995), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 799 , 133 L.Ed.2d 747 (1996); Linton v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co., 964 F.2d 1480, 1488 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 975 , 113 S.Ct. 467 , 121 L.Ed.2d 375 (1992); In re Dutile, 935 F.2d 61, 62-63 (5th Cir.1991) (relying on Romero and relied on by both Servis and Linton).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dao v. Knightsbridge International Reinsurance Corp.
See, e.g., Servis v. Hiller Sys., Inc., 54 F.3d 203 , 207 (4th Cir.1995) (noting that “[ajdmiralty and maritime cases may ... be removable to federal court when there exists some independent basis for federal jurisdiction, such as diversity of citizenship or when federal jurisdiction is independently established by a federal maritime statute”) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1084 , 116 S.Ct. 799 , 133 L.Ed.2d 747 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hiller Systems, Inc.
v.
Servis, Administratrix of the Estate of Humphrey
v.
Servis, Administratrix of the Estate of Humphrey
No. 95-595.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 16, 1996.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of Michael G. Miller and Sadie R. Richardson for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.