cited Cited "see" Cordova v. Johnson See United States v. Davis, 61 F.3d 291, 305 (5th Cir.1995), cert, denied, 516 U.S. 1135 , 116 S.Ct. 961 , 133 L.Ed,2d 883 (1996). 187 .

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Nasiruddin See, e.g., United States v. Hourihan, 66 F.3d 458, 465 (2d Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1135 (1996); United States v. Boyles, 57 F.3d 535, 544 (7th Cir. _________________________________________________________________ defendant argued that the Government should have been directed by the district court to elect between the two counts because they were contra- dictory.