Anderson v. Clow, 520 U.S. 1103 (1997). · Go Syfert
Search
Anderson v. Clow, 520 U.S. 1103 (1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“technical obsolescence of computer equipment in a field marked by rapid technological advances is information within the public domain”
43 citation events (19 in the last 25 years) across 17 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re Splash Technology Holdings Inc. Securities Litigation (cand, 2001-08-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) In Re Splash Technology Holdings Inc. Securities Litigation
N.D. Cal. · 2001 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
technical obsolescence of computer equipment in a field marked by rapid technological advances is information within the public domain
discussed Cited "see" United States v. St. Luke's Subacute Care Hospital, Inc.
9th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Taylor, 66 F.3d 254 (9th Cir.1995) (per curiam) (implicitly rejecting, without affirmatively holding, that there is no materiality requirement under § 287), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1103 , 117 S.Ct. 1105 , 137 L.Ed.2d 307 (1997); see also Li v. Ashcroft, 389 F.3d 892 (9th Cir.2004) (stating, without affirmatively holding, that there is no materiality requirement under § 287). 2 Conse quently, there is no “known right” that appellants could possibly have waived.
cited Cited "see" Nursing Home Pension Fund v. Oracle Corp.
N.D. Cal. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Stac Electronics Securities Litigation, 89 F.3d 1399 , 1405 n. 4 (9th Cir.1996), cert denied, 520 U.S. 1103 , 117 S.Ct. 1105 , 137 L.Ed.2d 308 (1997).
cited Cited "see" In Re Autodesk, Inc. Securities Litigation
N.D. Cal. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Stac Electronics Securities Litigation, 89 F.3d 1399 , 1405 n.4 (9th Cir.1996). cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1103 , 117 S.Ct. 1105 , 137 L.Ed.2d 308 (1997).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Plevy v. Haggerty
C.D. Cal. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
“In order to be liable for unreasonably disclosed third-party forecasts, defendants must have put their imprimatur, express or implied, on the projections.” In re Syntex Corp. Securities Litigation, 95 F.3d 922, 934 (9th Cir.1996); see also In re Stac Electronics Securities Litigation, 89 F.3d 1399, 1410 (9th Cir.1996) (same), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1103 , 117 S.Ct. 1105 , 137 L.Ed.2d 308 (1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Anderson
v.
Clow
No. 96-845.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 3, 1997.
520 U.S. 1103
Cited by 12 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 67%
Citer courts: N.D. California (1)

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.