green
Positive treatment
7.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Pitt
But see United States v. Hayden, 85 F.3d 153, 162 (4th Cir.1996) (where police found a firearm in defendant’s bedroom in his apartment from which he distributed cocaine, the Fourth Circuit held that his conviction under the “cany” prong of § 924(c)(1) required proof that the weapon was within the defendant's reach and available for his immediate use) (citing United States v. Riascos-Suarez, 73 F.3d 616, 622-23 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 136 , 136 L.Ed.2d 84 (1996)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Diane Knott v. Mark Sullivan
See United States v. Riascos-Suarez, 73 F.3d 616, 625 (6th Cir.) ("A search may be conducted without a warrant if a person with a privacy interest in the item to be searched gives free and voluntary consent.") (citing Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 219, 222, 93 S.Ct. 2041 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973)), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 848 , 117 S.Ct. 136 , 136 L.Ed.2d 84 (1996). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. D'Armond
See United States v. Westbrook, 125 F.3d 996, 1009 (7th Cir.) (‘We join the other circuits that uniformly have held, after [United States v.] Lopez, [ 514 U.S. 549 (1995) ] that it was within the authority of the Congress under the Commerce Clause to create drug laws criminalizing narcotics transactions such as those found under 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841.”), cert. denied, 118 S.Ct. 643 (1997); see United States v. Wacker, 72 F.3d 1453, 1475 (10th Cir.1995) (“21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) is constitutional.”), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 848 , 117 S.Ct. 136 , 136 L.Ed.2d 84 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lipp
See United States v. Wacker, 72 F.3d 1453 (10th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 848 , 117 S.Ct. 136 , 136 L.Ed.2d 84 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gibbs
See J.A. at 1731-34. 41 To be during and in relation to the drug trafficking crime, "the Government must prove that the firearm furthered the purpose or effect of the crime and that its presence or involvement was not the result of coincidence." United States v. Riascos-Suarez, 73 F.3d 616, 623 (6th Cir.) (citing Smith v. United States, 508 U.S. 223 , 113 S.Ct. 2050 , 124 L.Ed.2d 138 (1993)), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 848 , 117 S.Ct. 136 , 136 L.Ed.2d 84 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Vining v. Enterprise Financial Group
See United States v. Wacker, 72 F.3d 1453, 1468-69 (10th Cir.1995), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 136 , 136 L.Ed.2d 84 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Vining Ex Rel. Vining v. Enterprise Financial Group, Inc.
See United States v. Wacker, 72 F.3d 1453, 1468-69 (10th Cir.1995), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 136 , 136 L.Ed.2d 84 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Marty
See United States v. Wacker, 72 F.3d 1453, 1471 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 136 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Moore
See United States v. Wacker, 72 F.3d 1453 , 1477 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 136 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Calvin Moore
See United States v. Wacker, 72 F.3d 1453, 1477 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 136 , 136 L.Ed.2d 84 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Wayne Redmond
See United States v. Wacker, 72 F.3d 1453, 1462-63 (10th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 117 S.Ct. 136 (1996). 9 Section 922(g) requires that the firearm in question must have been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Redmond
See United States v. Wacker, 72 F.3d 1453, 1462-63 (10th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 136 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bryan Allen Hartsfield
See United States v. Wacker, 72 F.3d 1453, 1475 (10th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 117 S.Ct. 136 (1996).
examined
Cited "see"
In Re Edward Hanserd, Movant
(4×)
See United States v. Riascos-Suarez, 73 F.3d 616, 623 (6th Cir.) (“[T]he firearm was not carried ‘in relation to’ possession of cocaine, since no drugs were found in the car with the weapon.”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 117 S.Ct. 136 , 136 L.Ed.2d 84 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eric Taylor A/K/A \Shug\""
(2×)
Under Bailey, a conviction under the use prong of § 924(e)(1) requires “evidence sufficient to show an active employment of the firearm by the defendant, a use that makes the firearm an operative factor in relation to the predicate offense.” — U.S. at -, 116 S.Ct. at 505 (emphasis in the original); see United States v. Riascos-Suarez, 73 F.3d 616, 623 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 136 , 136 L.Ed.2d 84 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lewis
See United States v. Wacker, 72 F.3d 1453 (10th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 136 , 136 L.Ed.2d 84 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Carlos
See United States v. Wacker, 72 F.3d 1453 (10th Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. ---, 117 S.Ct. 136 , 136 L.Ed.2d 84 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Conley
However, as Judge Wier astutely noted, a subsequent legal clarification as to an element of the crime does not, without more, render an otherwise intelligent guilty plea involuntary or invalid. [R. 159 at 23]; see also United States v. Riascos-Suarez , 73 F.3d 616 , 622-24 (6th Cir.), cert. denied , 519 U.S. 848 , 117 S.Ct. 136 , 136 L.Ed.2d 84 (1996), superseded by statute , An Act to Throttle Criminal Use of Guns, Pub.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gary Walter Dash
See, e.g., United States v. Wacker, 72 F.3d 1453, 1475 (10th Cir.1995, as modified Mar. 11, 1996), cert. denied, 117 S.Ct. 136 (1996) (quoting 21 U.S.C. § 801 (3)-(6)).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dash
See, e.g., United States v. Wacker, 72 F.3d 1453, 1475 (10th Cir. 1995, as modified Mar. 11, 1996), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 136 (1996) (quoting 21 U.S.C. § 801 (3)-(6)).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Maurice Cooke
(4×)
Compare United States v. Riascos-Suarez, 73 F.3d 616, 622-623 (6th Cir.1996) (“We find that in order for a defendant to be convicted of carrying a gun in violation of section 924(e)(1), the firearm must be immediately available for use — on the defendant or within his or her reach.”), certiorari denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 136 , 136 L.Ed.2d 84 (1996), and United States v. Baker, 78 F.3d 1241, 1247 (7th Cir.1996) (agreeing with Ri-ascos-Suarez and holding “that a defendant who transports a gun on his person or within his reach, available for immediate use ... may — consistent with B…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Michael STEINBERG, Defendant-Appellant
See id.; see also United States v. Riascos-Suarez, 73 F.3d 616, 623 (6th Cir.1996) (upholding a conviction for carrying a firearm in violation of § 924(c)(1) where the gun was visibly placed in the driver’s side console), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 136 , 136 L.Ed.2d 84 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bolling
See, e.g., United States v. Riascos-Suarez, 73 F.3d 616, 623-24 (6th Cir.1996) (although defendant could not be convicted of using firearm under Bailey , trial court correctly accepted plea based on showing that defendant carried firearm), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 136 , — L.Ed.2d - (1996); United States v. Turner, No. Crim. 92-600, 1996 WL 311472 *3 (E.D.Pa.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bowyer
v.
Indiana
v.
Indiana
No. 95-9288.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1996.
Published
Ct. App. Ind. Certiorari denied.