Paolo Gucci Design Studio, Ltd. v. Sinatra, 117 S. Ct. 1552 (1997). · Go Syfert
Paolo Gucci Design Studio, Ltd. v. Sinatra, 117 S. Ct. 1552 (1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
54 citation events (14 in the last 25 years) across 23 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Jarrod Wagner v. Hesston Corporation Agco Corporation Agco Corporation of Delaware (ca8, 2006-06-08)
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Jarrod Wagner v. Hesston Corporation Agco Corporation Agco Corporation of Delaware
8th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Peitzmeier v. Hennessy Indus., Inc., 97 F.3d 293, 297 (8th Cir.1996) (applying Daubert’s peer-review factor to an expert’s theory regarding a tire-changing machine), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1196 , 117 S.Ct. 1552 , 137 L.Ed.2d 701 (1997). 8 .
cited Cited "see" Group Health Plan, Inc. v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.
8th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Peitzmeier v. Hennessy Ind., Inc., 97 F.3d 293, 296-97 (8th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1196 , 117 S.Ct. 1552 , 137 L.Ed.2d 701 (1997).
cited Cited "see" Petit v. City of Chicago
N.D. Ill. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Middleton v. City of Flint, Mich., 92 F.3d 396, 408-09 (6th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1196 , 117 S.Ct. 1552 , 137 L.Ed.2d 700 (1997).
discussed Cited "see" Glover v. Johnson
6th Cir. · 1998 · signal: accord · confidence high
At bottom, using an inter-prison program comparison to analyze equal protection claims improperly assumes that the Constitution requires all prisons to have similar program priorities and to allocate resources similarly. 190 Klinger v. Department of Corrections, 31 F.3d 727, 732 (8th Cir.1994) (citations and footnote omitted); accord Women Prisoners v. District of Columbia, 93 F.3d 910, 924-27 (D.C.Cir.1996), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 1552 , 137 L.Ed.2d 701 (1997).
discussed Cited "see" Glover v. Johnson
6th Cir. · 1998 · signal: accord · confidence high
Klinger v. Department of Corrections, 31 F.3d 727, 732 (8th Cir.1994) (citations and footnote omitted); accord Women Prisoners v. District of Columbia, 93 F.3d 910, 924-27 (D.C.Cir.1996), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1552 ,- 137 L.Ed.2d 701 (1997).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Associated General Contractors of Ohio, Inc. v. Drabik
S.D. Ohio · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Middleton v. City of Flint, Michigan, 92 F.3d 396, 413 (6th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1196 , 117 S.Ct. 1552 , 137 L.Ed.2d 700 (1997) (remedial plan for promotion of police sergeants which lasted nine years was not “narrowly tailored”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 15,475 Chad Weisgram, Individually and on Behalf of the Heirs of Bonnie Jo Weisgram, Decedent v. Marley Company, a Delaware Corporation and Its Subsidiary, Marley Electric Heating Company, a Delaware Corporation United Dominion Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Company v. Marley Company, a Delaware Corporation Marley Electric Heating Company, a Delaware Corporation United Dominion Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
8th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Wright v. Willamette Indus., Inc., 91 F.3d 1105, 1108 (8th Cir.1996) (reversing denial of JAML because improper expert testimony was admitted by the district court); see also Peitzmeier v. Hennessy Indus., Inc., 97 F.3d 293, 296 (8th Cir.1996) (affirming district court's decision to grant summary judgment on the grounds that certain expert testimony was inadmissible "and that based on the admissible, undisputed evidence [defendant manufacturer] was entitled to judgment as a matter of law"), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1196 , 117 S.Ct. 1552 , 137 L.Ed.2d 701 (1997).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Chad Weisgram v. Marley Company (2×)
8th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Wright v. Willamette Indus., Inc., 91 F.3d 1105, 1108 (8th Cir.1996) (reversing denial of JAML because improper expert testimony was admitted by the district court); see also Peitzmeier v. Hennessy Indus., Inc., 97 F.3d 293, 296 (8th Cir.1996) (affirming district court’s decision to grant summary judgment on the grounds that certain expert testimony was inadmissible "and that based on the admissible, undisputed evidence [defendant manufacturer] was entitled to judgment as a matter of law"), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1196 , 117 S.Ct. 1552 , 137 L.Ed.2d 701 (1997).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Sandra Marsh v. Tom Newton, Warden
10th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
Plaintiff specifically alleges disparities in recreational, educational, and vocational opportunities; community-based activities; work, pre-release and prison farm programs; award of good time credits and lump sum awards; access to television; telephone systems; restrictions on visitation; and operation of a snack bar. 13 "To establish a gender-based claim under the Equal Protection Clause, [plaintiff] must, as a threshold matter, demonstrate that [she has] been treated differently by a state actor than others who are similarly situated simply because [plaintiff] belong[s] to a particular cla…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PAOLO GUCCI DESIGN STUDIO, LTD.
v.
Frank G. SINATRA, Trustee of the Substantively Consolidated Estates of Paolo Gucci
No. 96-1283.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 28, 1997.
117 S. Ct. 1552
Published

Case below, 105 F.3d 837.

[*1553] Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.