green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Shiyang Huang v. Equifax Inc.
See In re Asbestos Litig., 90 F.3d 963, 988 (5th Cir. 1996) (holding Article III’s case-or-controversy requirement was satisfied, notwithstanding a settlement, in light of the “the adversarial positions which the parties occupied before settlement negotiations and the positions to which they will return if the settlement is not approved”), vacated on other grounds, Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp., 521 U.S. 1114 , 117 S. Ct. 2503 (1997) (mem.).
discussed
Cited "see"
Charlie Lee Mitchell v. Warden Gerald Mason
(2×)
Accord Abrams v. Barnett, 100 F.3d 485, 489-92 (7th Cir. 1996), vacated on other grounds, 521 U.S. 1114 , 117 S.Ct. 2503 (1997) (rejecting habeas petitioner's claim that denial of his lawyer's request for a private place to meet with the defendant during a noon-hour recess deprived him of his right to counsel.). 1 102 Congress has limited the circumstances in which habeas corpus relief can be granted:An application for a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court shall not be granted with respect to any claim that was adjudicated on the mer…
cited
Cited "see"
Doe v. Karadzic
See Flanagan v. Ahearn, 521 U.S. 1114 , 117 S.Ct. 2503 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1008 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Flanagan v. Ahearn
See Carter v. Johnson, 131 F.3d 452 , 457 n. 2 (5th Cir.1997). .See Flanagan v. Ahearn (In re Asbestos Litig.), 90 F.3d 963 (5th Cir.1996) ("Ahearn I"), vacated, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2503 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1008 (1997). .
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Asbestos Litigation
See Carter v. Johnson, 131 F.3d 452 , 457 n. 2 (5th Cir.1997) 3 See Flanagan v. Ahearn (In re Asbestos Litig.), 90 F.3d 963 (5th Cir.1996) ("Ahearn I"), vacated, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 2503 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1008 (1997) 4 For a recitation of the facts and proceedings, the reader is referred to the prior panel majority and dissenting opinions in this case.
discussed
Cited "see"
Walker v. Liggett Group, Inc.
(2×)
See Flanagan v. Ahearn,-U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 2503 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1008 (1997) and Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp.,-U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 2503 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1008 (1997). .
cited
Cited "see"
Abrams v. Barnett
See Abrams v. Barnett, 100 F.3d 485 (7th Cir.1996), vacated, Abrams v. Barnett, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2503 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1008 (1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Esteban ORTIZ
v.
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
v.
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
No. 96-1394.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 27, 1997.
117 S. Ct. 2503
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Case below, 90 F.3d 963; 101 F.3d 368.
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor, 521 U.S.-,117 S.Ct. 2231, — L.Ed.2d -(1997).