green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
19.4 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1997 ·
…district court may grant summary judgment or jaml for the employer, even if plaintiff has some evidence of pretext if that evidence, for one reason or another, falls short of proving intentional discrimination.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Cinicola v. Scharffenberger
See In re Catapult Entm’t, Inc., 165 F.3d 747 , 749-50 (9th Cir.) (adopting "hypothetical test”), cert. dismissed, 528 U.S. 924 , 120 S.Ct. 369 , 145 L.Ed.2d 248 (1999); In re Catron, 158 B.R. 629, 638 (E.D.Va.1993) (same), aff'd without opinion, 25 F.3d 1038 (4th Cir.1994); but see Institut Pasteur v. Cambridge Biotech Corp., 104 F.3d 489, 493-94 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1120 , 117 S.Ct. 2511 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1997); In re Cajun Elec.
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. TechDyn Systems Corp. (In Re TechDyn Systems Corp.)
In re Catron, 158 B.R. 629, 633 (E.D.Va.1993), aff'd 25 F.3d 1038 (4th Cir.1994) (unpublished op.); In re Catapult Entertainment, Inc., 165 F.3d 747 , 750 (9th Cir.1999); In re West Electronics, Inc. 852 F.2d 79, 83 (3d Cir.1988); In re James Cable Partners, 27 F.3d 534, 537 (11th Cir.1994) (describing § 365(c) as presenting a hypothetical question); but see Institut Pasteur v. Cambridge Biotech Corp., 104 F.3d 489, 493 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1120 , 117 S.Ct. 2511 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1997).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Footstar, Inc.
sjubsections 365(c) and (e) contemplate a case-by-case inquiry into whether the nondebtor par 790 ty.. .actually was being 'forced to accept performance under its executory contract from someone other than the debtor party with whom it originally contracted.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Evans v. McClain of Georgia, Inc.
(2×)
district court may grant summary judgment or jaml for the employer, even if plaintiff has some evidence of pretext if that evidence, for one reason or another, falls short of proving intentional discrimination.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Evans v. McClain of Georgia, Inc.
district court may grant summary judgment or jaml for the employer, even if plaintiff has some evidence of pretext if that evidence, for one reason or another, falls short of proving intentional discrimination.
discussed
Cited "see"
Nelson v. Long Lines Ltd.
See id. (citing Ryther v. RARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 842-44 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997), a “pretext” case, in which similar comments were held to be insufficient to raise an inference of age discrimination).
cited
Cited "see"
Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Norton
See Dubois v. U.S. Dept. of Agric., 102 F.3d 1273, 1286 (1st Cir.1996), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997); Sierra Club, 976 F.2d at 773 . 60 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Sadowski v. Bush
See Federation for American Immigration Reform, Inc. v. Reno, 93 F.3d 897, 901 (D.C.Cir.1996), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997) [hereinafter “FAIR”]. 2 As to the second requirement, the plaintiff has additionally failed to allege any causal connection between the defendant’s alleged failure to enforce the immigration laws and any harm to him.
cited
Cited "see"
Sarah Crone v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
See Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832 , 848 & n. 13 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Ridgeland v. National Park Service
See Dubois v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, 102 F.3d 1273, 1294 (1st Cir.1996) (“In contrast to [National Environmental Policy Act’s] focus on process, the [Clean Water Act] is substantive, focusing upon the ‘integrity of the Nation’s Waters, not the permit process.” ’) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997). 123 F.3d at 1152 . 22 These observations apply equally here, and command the conclusion that plaintiffs have not shown a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of their wetlands-based objections to the FSEIS. *909 Traff…
cited
Cited "see"
Paul R. Yancey v. Weyerhaeuser Company, Individually and D/B/A Dequeen & Eastern Railroad Co., Inc.
See Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 836 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Morgan v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
See Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 836 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, *1153 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Snyder v. Saberliner Corp.
See Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 836 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997) Initially, plaintiff must establish a prima facie case of discrimination, and if she does so, the burden shifts to defendant who must articulate a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the adverse employment action in order to rebut a presumption of discrimination Breeding v. Arthur J.
cited
Cited "see"
Stephen L. Langlie v. Onan Corporation
See Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 849 (8th Cir.1997) (en banc) (Loken, J., writing for a majority on this issue), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Eagleview Technologies, Inc. v. MDS Associates
See Isenbergh v. Knight-Ridder Newspaper Sales, Inc., 84 F.3d 1380, 1383 (11th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2511 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Kristen Dhyne, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross v. Meiners Thriftway, Inc., Defendant-Appellee/cross
See Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 836-38 (8th Cir.1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bauer v. Metz Baking Co.
See id. (citing Ryther v. RARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 842-44 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997), a “pretext” case, in which similar comments were held to be insufficient to raise an inference of age discrimination).
discussed
Cited "see"
No. 98-2550
(2×)
See Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 844 (8th Cir.1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 117 S.Ct. 2510 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Gregory Scott v. Cty. of Ramsey
See Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 844 (8th Cir.1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
H & H Brokerage, Inc. v. Vanliner Insurance Company
(2×)
See Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 844 (8th Cir.1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997); White v. Pence, 961 F.2d 776 , 779 n. 4 (8th Cir.1992) (citing Dace v. ACF Indus., Inc., 722 F.2d 374, 375 (8th Cir.1983)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Oleta C. Van Steenburgh v. The Rival Company
(2×)
See id. (citing Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 836 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997)). 8 The 300-day limitations period for Van Steenburgh's claims began on May 3, 1995.
cited
Cited "see"
Oleta Van Steenburgh v. The Rival Co.
See id. (citing Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 836 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 2510 (1997)).
discussed
Cited "see"
H & H Brokerage v. Vanliner Ins. Co.
See Ryther v. Kare 11, 108 F.3d 832, 844 (8th Cir. 1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 117 S.Ct. 2510 (1997); White v. Pence, 961 F.2d 776 , 779 n.4 (8th Cir. 1992) (citing Dace v. ACF Indus., Inc., 722 F.2d 374, 375 (8th Cir. 1984)).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Catapult Entertainment, Inc., a California Corporation, AKA Storm Systems, Debtor. Stephen Perlman v. Catapult Entertainment, Inc., a California Corporation, AKA Storm Systems
See Institut Pasteur v. Cambridge Biotech Corp., 104 F.3d 489, 493 (1st Cir.) (rejecting the hypothetical test in favor of the actual test), cert. denied, 521 U.S. 1120 , 117 S.Ct. 2511 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1997). 2 Although we have on two occasions declined to choose between these competing visions, see Worthington v. General Motors Corp. (In re Claremont Acquisition Corp.), 113 F.3d 1029, 1032 (9th Cir.1997); Everex, 89 F.3d at 676-77, today we hold that we are bound by the plain terms of the statute and join the Third and Eleventh Circuits in adopting the "hypothetical test." III. 11 We begi…
discussed
Cited "see"
Perlman v. Catapult Entertainment, Inc. (In re Catapult Entertainment, Inc.)
See Institut Pasteur v. Cambridge Biotech Corp., 104 F.3d 489, 493 (1st Cir.) (rejecting the hypothetical test in favor of the actual test), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2511 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1997). 2 Although we have on two occasions declined to choose between these competing visions, see Worthington v. General Motors Corp. (In re Claremont Acquisition Corp.), 113 F.3d 1029, 1032 (9th Cir.1997); Everex, 89 F.3d at 676-77 , today we hold that we are bound by the plain terms of the statute and join the Third and Eleventh Circuits in adopting the “hypothetical test.” III.
discussed
Cited "see"
Deborah Kramer v. Logan County School District No. R-1, A/K/A Stapleton Public Schools
(2×)
See Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 844 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997). “[W]e will not set aside the jury’s verdict lightly.” Triton Corp. v. Hardrives, Inc., 85 F.3d 343, 345 (8th Cir.1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Lynn v. Deaconess Medical Center-West Campus
See Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832 , 838 n. 5 (8th Cir.1997) (en bane), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
78 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 595, 74 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,588 Michael Lynn v. Deaconess Medical Center-West Campus, Also Known as Deaconess West Hospital
See Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832 , 838 n. 5 (8th Cir.1997) (en banc), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Deborah Kramer v. Logan Cty. School
See Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 844 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 2510 (1997)). "[W]e will not set aside the jury’s verdict lightly." Triton Corp. v. Hardrives, Inc., 85 F.3d 343, 345 (8th Cir. 1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Terry Campbell v. Arkansas Department Of Correction
See Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 844 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997). 3 Terry Campbell was employed in the Arkansas state prison system for seventeen years prior to his appointment as warden of the Tucker Maximum Security Unit on September 20, 1994.
cited
Cited "see"
Campbell v. Arkansas Department of Correction
See Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 844 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Krohn v. Forsting
See Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 836-38 (8th Cir.) (en banc) (stating that while a plaintiff may rely on the same evidence to prove both pretext and intentional discrimination, the evidence must be sufficient to prove the employer is guilty of intentional discrimination), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Morgan ENOWMBITANG, Appellant, v. SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, INC., Appellee
See Ryther v. KARE 11, *973 108 F.3d 832, 836 (8th Cir.) (en banc) (describing shifting burden analysis), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997)..
cited
Cited "see"
Morgan Enowmbitang v. Seagate Technology
See Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 836 (8th Cir.) (en banc) (describing shifting burden analysis), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 2510 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Betty J. Widoe v. District 111 Otoe County School
See Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832 , 836 & n. 1 (8th Cir.1997) (en banc) (holding that the facts of the ease fall under the McDonnell Douglas standard, which does not require direct proof of discrimination for the plaintiff to make a submissible case), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Betty Widoe v. Otie Cty. School
See Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832 , 836 & n.1 (8th Cir.) (en banc) (holding that the facts of the case fall under the McDonnell Douglas standard, which does not require direct proof of discrimination for the plaintiff to make a submissible case), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 2510 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Greaser v. Missouri, Department of Corrections
See Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 845-46 (8th Cir.1997) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Eunice Greaser v. State of Missouri, Department of Corrections Dora Schriro George Lombardi Sarah Schuette Gerald Higgins Kelly Lock Michael Groose Appeals From the United States Vernon Heath Lawrence Bax Cecil R. District Court for the Riley James Cregger, Bill Keeth Western District of Missouri. Robert Walling, Carl White, Phillip Higgins, Eunice Greaser v. State of Missouri, Department of Corrections Dora Schriro George Lombardi Sarah Schuette Gerald Higgins Kelly Lock Michael Groose Vernon Heath Lawrence Bax Cecil R. Riley James Cregger, Bill Keeth, Robert Walling, Carl White Phillip Higgins
See Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 845-46 (8th Cir.1997) (en banc), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Janice L. WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HONEYWELL, INC., Defendant-Appellee
See Ryther v. RARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 836 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert, denied, -U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Hinchey v. NYNEX
See Dubois v. United States Dep't of Agric., 102 F.3d 1273, 1284 (1st Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 2510 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Hinchey v. Nynex Corp.
See Dubois v. United States Dep’t of Agric., 102 F.3d 1273, 1284 (1st Cir.1996), cert. denied, — U.S. ——, 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Janice L. White v. Honeywell, Inc.
See Ryther v. Kare 11, 108 F.3d 832, 836 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 2510 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re El Paso Refinery, L.P.
See Institut Pasteur v. Cambridge Biotech Corp., 104 F.3d 489 (1st Cir.1997) cert. denied, _ U.S. _, 117 S.Ct. 2511 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1997); In re Hartec Enters., Inc., 117 B.R. 865 (Bankr.W.D.Tex.1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Mary Jane HATHAWAY, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Marvin RUNYON, Postmaster General, Defendant—Appellee
See Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 844 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Black v. Wagner Brake Subsidiary
See Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 836 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997); Jetton v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., 121 F.3d 423, 425 (8th Cir.1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hicks, Muse & Co. v. Brandt
See Institui Pasteur v. Cambridge Biotech Corp. (In re Cambridge Biotech Corp.), 104 F.3d 489 , 492 n. 5 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, —U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 2511 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1997); Rochman v. Northeast Utils.
cited
Cited "see"
Action for Boston Community Development, Inc. v. Shalala
See Dubois v. United States Dep’t of AgriC., 102 F.3d 1273, 1289 (1st Cir.1996), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2510 , 138 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
ABCD, Inc. v. Shalala
See Dubois v. United States Dep't of ___ ______ _______________________ Agric., 102 F.3d 1273, 1289 (1st Cir. 1996), cert. denied, ______ ____________ 117 S. Ct. 2510 (1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
WCC Associates
v.
Hawaii Carpenters Trust Funds
v.
Hawaii Carpenters Trust Funds
No. 96-1651.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 27, 1997.
Cited by 51 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (3) · S.D. New York (1)
Sup. Ct. Haw. Certiorari denied.