green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
10.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1997 ·
…we do not agree that the commission's report, or congress's decision to reject it, affects the precedential value of our ruling that congress had a rational basis for the 100:1 ratio.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Errol Eugene Washington
(2×)
we do not agree that the commission's report, or congress's decision to reject it, affects the precedential value of our ruling that congress had a rational basis for the 100:1 ratio.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas E. Iverson, Sr.
See United States v. Jackson, 84 F.3d 1154, 1158 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 445 , 136 L.Ed.2d 341 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sam Sidney Allman
See United States v. Jackson, 84 F.3d 1154, 1158-59 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 445 , 136 L.Ed.2d 341 (1996) (court of appeals reviews the admission or exclusion of evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) for an abuse of discretion).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nelson
See United States v. Jackson, 84 F.3d 1154, 1158 (9th Cir.1996), cert. denied, -U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 445 , 136 L.Ed.2d 341 (1996) (noting that improper vouching occurs when the prosé-cutor places “the prestige of the government behind a witness through personal assurances of the witness’s veracity, or suggests that information not presented to the jury supports the witness’s testimony") (citation and internal quotations omitted). .
discussed
Cited "see"
48 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1184, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1360, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1903 United States of America v. Lamont Benedict Nelson, United States of America v. Keith Lamar Lott, AKA Kevin Moore, United States of America v. Kimberly Nichol Edwards, United States of America v. Bobby Lee Sehorn, AKA Lamar Athens
See United States v. Jackson, 84 F.3d 1154, 1158 (9th Cir.1996), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 445 , 136 L.Ed.2d 341 (1996) (noting that improper vouching occurs when the prosecutor places "the prestige of the government behind a witness through personal assurances of the witness's veracity, or suggests that information not presented to the jury supports the witness's testimony") (citation and internal quotations omitted) 9 Nelson also argues that the government failed to provide reasonable notice of the nature of the 404(b) evidence--specifically its legal purpose--in its notice or m…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wally Nuno Alarcon
See United States v. Jackson, 84 F.3d 1154, 1158 (9th Cir), cert. denied, 117 S.Ct. 445 (1996) (holding that a prosecutor's statements were reasonable inferences from the evidence and an invited response to the defense argument and did not constitute vouching).
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terry Bruce LUSSIER, Defendant-Appellant
See United States v. Jackson, 84 F.3d 1154, 1158 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 445 , 136 L.Ed.2d 341 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Philbert J. Antone
See United States v. Jackson, 84 F.3d 1154, 1158 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 117 S.Ct. 445 (1996); Fed.R.Crim.P. § 2(b).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Leandre Darryl Wilson
See United States v. Jackson, 84 F.3d 1154, 1159 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 445 , 136 L.Ed.2d 341 (1996); United States v. Sneezer, 983 F.2d 920, 924 (9th Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alejandro Ramirez-Ozuna
See 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1), 960(a)(1); see also United States v. Jackson, 84 F.3d 1154, 1159 (9th Cir.) (considering whether evidence sought to be admitted under Rule 404(b) "proves a material element of the offense charged"), cert. denied, 117 S.Ct. 445 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bastidas
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 96-6315.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 12, 1996.
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (2)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.