Rehman v. ECC Int'l Corp., 519 U.S. 993 (1996). · Go Syfert
Rehman v. ECC Int'l Corp., 519 U.S. 993 (1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
64 citation events (39 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Lapointe v. Commissioner of Correction (conn, 2015-04-21) · Strongest negative: State v. Sostre (connsuperct, 2002-10-11)
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" State v. Sostre
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2002 · signal: but see · confidence high
Ed. 2d 694 (1966), *Page 105 and its progeny; see also State v. Ferrell , 191 Conn. 37 , 40-41 , 463 A.2d 573 (1983); or; third, the statements were obtained in violation of the defendant's right to counsel or; fourth, article first , §§ 8 and 9 , of the constitution of Connecticut require the state to prove advisement and waiver of Miranda rights and voluntariness of a defendant's statement beyond a reasonable doubt when such statements are used as evidence of capital felony and the state cannot do so; but see State v. James , 237 Conn. 390 , 678 A.2d 1338 (1996), and State v. Lapointe , 23…
discussed Cited "but see" State of Connecticut v. Alex Sostre.
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2002 · signal: but see · confidence high
Ed. 2d 694 (1966), *105 and its progeny; see also State v. Ferrell, 191 Conn. 37, 40-41 , 463 A.2d 573 (1983); or; third, the statements were obtained in violation of the defendant’s right to counsel or; fourth, article first, §§ 8 and 9, of the constitution of Connecticut require the state to prove advisement and waiver of Miranda rights and voluntariness of a defendant’s statement beyond a reasonable doubt when such statements are used as evidence of capital felony and the state cannot do so; but see State v. James, 237 Conn. 390 , 678 A.2d 1338 (1996), and State v. Lapointe, 237 Conn.…
discussed Cited "but see" Williams v. United States (In Re Williams) (2×)
1st Cir. · 1998 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Howard v. Mail-Well Envelope Co., 90 F.3d 433, 436-37 (10th Cir.1996) (order sanctioning attorney is capable of being reviewed on appeal), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 484 , 136 L.Ed.2d 378 (1996)
cited Cited "see" Lapointe v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Lapointe, 237 Conn. 694, 695 , 678 A.2d 942 , cert. denied, 519 U.S. 994 , 117 S. Ct. 484 , 136 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. DeJesus
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally State v. Lapointe, 237 Conn. 694, 724-27 , 678 A.2d 942 , cert. denied, 519 U.S. 994 , 117 S. Ct. 484 , 136 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Bjorklund
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Lapointe, 237 Conn. 694, 733 , 678 A.2d 942 , cert. denied, 519 U.S. 994 , 117 S. Ct. 484 , 136 L.
cited Cited "see" Doe v. Thames Valley Council for Community Action, Inc.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: accord · confidence high
State v. Williams, 231 Conn. 235, 249 , 645 A.2d 999 (1994); accord State v. Lapointe, 237 Conn. 694, 737 , 678 A.2d 942 , cert. denied, 519 U.S. 994 , 117 S. Ct. 484 , 136 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Santiago
Conn. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Lapointe, 237 Conn. 694, 732 , 678 A.2d 942 , cert. denied, 519 U.S. 994 , 117 S. Ct. 484 , 136 L.
discussed Cited "see" Starcher v. Correctional Medical Systems, Inc.
6th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Howard v. Mail-Well Envelope Co., 90 F.3d 433, 436 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. - 117 S.Ct. 484 , 136 L.Ed.2d 378 (1996). 7 We believe the better view is that a non-participating attorney, like a participating attorney, ordinarily must wait until final disposition of the underlying ease before filing an appeal.
discussed Cited "see" Starcher v. Correctional Medical Systems
6th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Howard v. Mail-Well Envelope Co., 90 F.3d 433, 436 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 484 , 136 L.Ed.2d 378 (1996). 7 20 We believe the better view is that a non-participating attorney, like a participating attorney, ordinarily must wait until final disposition of the underlying case before filing an appeal.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Hines
Conn. · 1998 · signal: accord · confidence high
At minimum, the statement must “independently bear adequate indicia of reliability to afford the trier of fact a satisfactory basis for evaluating [its] truth . . . .’’State v. Williams, 231 Conn. 235, 249 , 645 A.2d 999 (1994); accord State v. Lapointe, 237 Conn. 694, 737 , 678 A.2d 942 , cert. denied, 519 U.S. 994 , 117 S. Ct. 484 , 136 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Correa
Conn. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
Ed. 2d 694 (1966); see State v. Lapointe, 237 Conn. 694, 734 , 678 A.2d 942 , cert. denied, 519 U.S. 994 , 117 S. Ct. 484 , 136 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Anonymous
Conn. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Lapointe, 237 Conn. 694 , 716 n.27, 678 A.2d 942 , cert. denied, U.S. , 117 S. Ct. 484 , 136 L.
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Brandon
Conn. · 2022 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Lapointe, 237 Conn. 694, 727 , 678 A.2d 942 (defendant’s failure to ask to leave weighed against finding of cus- tody), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 994 , 117 S. Ct. 484 , 136 L.
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Griffin
Conn. · 2021 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Lapointe, 237 Conn. 694, 734 , 678 A.2d 942 (provision of Miranda rights ‘‘is relevant to a finding of voluntariness’’), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 994 , 117 S. Ct. 484 , 136 L.
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Mangual
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
State v. Pinder, supra, 250 Conn. 410 -12; see also State v. Lapointe, 237 Conn. 694, 725 , 678 A.2d 942 , cert. denied, 519 U.S. 994 , 117 S. Ct. 484 , 136 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Lockhart (2×)
Conn. · 2010 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Lapointe, 237 Conn. 694, 731-33 , 678 A.2d 942 , cert. denied, 519 U.S. 994 , 117 S. Ct. 484 , 136 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Abreu
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
See State v. Carter, 189 Conn. 631, 638 , 458 A.2d 379 (1983) (eight hour period of detention before having given third confession, although substantial, “does not remotely approach the length of those interrogations held to be so objectionable on that ground among others as to warrant reversal of a finding by a trial court that a confession was voluntary”); see also State v. Lapointe, 237 Conn. 694, 734 , 678 A.2d 942 (eight and three-quarter hour police interview), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 994 , 117 S. Ct. 484 , 136 L.
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Doyle
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
State v. Finder, supra, 250 Conn. 410 -12; see also State v. Lapointe, 237 Conn. 694, 725 , 678 A.2d 942 , cert. denied, 519 U.S. 994 , 117 S. Ct. 484 , 136 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Britton
Conn. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
Those acknowledgments coupled with the circumstance that, *612 after giving an exculpatory statement, the defendant and his aunt were, in fact, driven home, lends strong support to the trial court’s implicit finding that the defendant was not in custody at New Haven police headquarters.” Id., 414-15 ; see also State v. Lapointe, 237 Conn. 694, 726 , 678 A.2d 942 (“[g]iven the defendant’s freedom of movement about the police station and the fact that he had been repeatedly told that he was free to leave, we conclude that the defendant was not in custody”), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 994 ,…
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Torres
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
Ed. 2d 607 (1980); see also State v. Lapointe, 237 Conn. 694, 726 , 678 A.2d 942 (applying Derrico’s language to custody issue), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 994 , 117 S. Ct. 484 , 136 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Turner
Conn. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
This court has stated several times, moreover, that it is realistic to assume “that a reasonable person would feel free to leave when that person was told repeatedly that he could do so.” State v. Pinder, supra, 250 Conn. 413 ; see, e.g., State v. Greenfield, 228 Conn. 62 , 71 n.10, 634 A.2d 879 (1993) (“an important factor distinguishing a consensual encounter from a seizure is whether the police expressly informed the defendant that he was free to leave at the outset of the interview”); State v. Northrop, 213 Conn. 405, 415 , 568 A.2d 439 (1990) (“[i]t is difficult to conceive of a…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rehman
v.
ECC International Corp.
No. 96-555.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 18, 1996.
519 U.S. 993
Published

Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.