green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Joe Mario Trevino, Jr. v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
(2×)
See United States v. Mizell, 88 F.3d 288, 299 (5th Cir.) (reviewing a district court's denial of a recusal motion for an abuse of discretion), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1046 , 117 S.Ct. 620 , 136 L.Ed.2d 543 (1996); In re City of Houston, 745 F.2d 925, 927 (5th Cir.1984) ("The issue of judicial disqualification is solely one of law.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Millsaps
See United States v. Sotelo, 97 F.3d 782, 797-98 (5th Cir.1996(finding harmless the admission of hearsay evidence when the evidence was later stricken, a curative instruction was given, and the evidence of guilt was overwhelming), cert. *994 denied, Quintana v. United States, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 620 , 136 L.Ed.2d 543 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Santos
See United States v. Procopio, 88 F.3d 21, 27 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 620 , 136 L.Ed.2d 543 (1996) and — *19 U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1008 , 136 L.Ed.2d 886 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bill Fred Hamilton
See United States v. Mizell, 88 F.3d 288, 294 (5th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 620 , 136 L.Ed.2d 543 (1996); United States v. Levy-Cordero, 67 F.3d 1002, 1012 (1st Cir. 1995), cert. denied,— U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 1558 , 134 L.Ed.2d 659 (1996); Bowling v. Vose, 3 F.3d 559, 561 (1st Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1185 , 114 S.Ct. 1236 , 127 L.Ed.2d 580 (1994); United States v. Johnson, 970 F.2d 907, 910-11 (D.C.Cir.1992); Horton v. Zant, 941 F.2d 1449, 1466 (11th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 952 , 112 S.Ct. 1516 , 117 L.Ed.2d 652 (1992); Eckert v. Tansy, 936 F.2d 444, 446…
discussed
Cited "see"
JOE MARIO TREVINO, JR v. GARY L JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION
See United States v. Mizell, 88 F.3d 288, 299 (5th Cir.) (reviewing a district court’s denial of a recusal motion for an abuse of discretion), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 620 (1996); In re City of Houston, 745 F.2d 925, 927 (5th Cir. 1984) (“The issue of judicial disqualification is solely one of law.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Van Shutters, II
Schultz, 14 F.3d at 1098 ; see also United States v. Procopio, 88 F.3d 21, 28 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 620 , 136 L.Ed.2d 543 (1996) (applying Leon good faith exception when “only omission [in affidavit] was the failure to explain how the agent — who had ample basis for the contention — knew that ‘81 Intervale’ was ‘Kiley’s address.’ ”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Baltazar Saenz
Bermea, 30 F.3d at 1569 ; see also United States v. Mizell, 88 F.3d 288, 296 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 620 , 136 L.Ed.2d 543 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John W. Lindsey, Charles T. Howland, Jr. And Jimmie D. Poe, Sr.
See, e.g., United States v. Sotelo, 97 F.3d 782, 789 (5th Cir.1996) (discussing only that defendant “organized, supervised or managed” with no distinction among terms), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 117 S.Ct. 620 , 136 L.Ed.2d 543 (1996) & — U.S. —, 117 S.Ct. 1002 , 136 L.Ed.2d 881 (1997) & — U.S. —, 117 S.Ct. 1324 , 137 L.Ed.2d 486 (1997); United States v. Edmonds, 52 F.3d 1236, 1239 (3d Cir.1995) (same), reh’d en banc, 80 F.3d 810 (3d Cir.) (reh’d on different issue), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 117 S.Ct. 295 , 136 L.Ed.2d 214 (1996); United States v. Rockelman, 49 F.3d 418, 42…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BALTAZAR SAENZ
Bermea, 30 F.3d at 1569 ; see also United States v. Mizell, 88 F.3d 288, 296 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 620 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ruth Carol HOLLAR
v.
UNITED STATES
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 96-6674.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 16, 1996.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.