green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
10.1 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee v. YENKIN-MAJESTIC PAINT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant
the law does not require employers to make perfect decisions, nor forbid them from making decisions that others may disagree with. rather, employers may not hire, fire, or promote for impermissible, discriminatory reasons.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Bryan K. Kaluna
Watts reaffirmed that the “preponderance standard at sentencing generally satisfies due process” but noted that there was a divergence among the circuits as to whether “relevant conduct that would dramatically increase the sentence must be based on clear and convincing evidence.” Id. 117 S.Ct. at 637.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Burgos-Figueroa
See United States v. Watts, 519 U.S. 148, 154 , 117 S.Ct. 683 , 136 L.Ed.2d 554 (1997) (per curiam) (recognizing that uncharged conduct can serve as the basis for a sentencing enhancement); United States v. Smith, 267 F.3d 1154, 1165 (D.
cited
Cited "see"
People v. Tuffo
See United States v. Watts, 519 U.S. 148, 156 , 117 S.Ct. 683 , 186 L.Ed.2d 554 (1997). c.
discussed
Cited "see"
West American Insurance v. Mund
Accord Starzenski v. City of Elkhart, 87 F.3d 872, 880 (7th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1055 , 117 S.Ct. 683 , 136 L.Ed.2d 608 (1997); Tolle v. Carroll Touch, Inc., 23 F.3d 174, 178 (7th Cir.1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Berger v. Xerox Retirement Income Guaranty Plan
Accord Starzenski v. City of Elkhart, 87 F.3d 872, 880 (7th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1055 , 117 S.Ct. 683 , 136 L.Ed.2d 608 (1997); Tolle v. Carroll Touch, Inc., 23 F.3d 174, 178 (7th Cir.1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Coil v. Jack Tanner Towing Co., Inc.
Accord Starzenski v. City of Elkhart, 87 F.3d 872, 880 (7th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1055 , 117 S.Ct. 683 , 136 L.Ed.2d 608 (1997); Tolle v. Carroll Touch, Inc., 23 F.3d 174, 178 (7th Cir.1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
TIG Ins. Co. v. Reliable Research Co., Inc.
Accord Starzenski v. City of Elkhart, 87 F.3d 872, 880 (7th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1055 , 117 S.Ct. 683 , 136 L.Ed.2d 608 (1997); Tolle v. Carroll Touch, Inc., 23 F.3d 174, 178 (7th Cir.1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Berger v. Nazametz
Accord Starzenski v. City of Elkhart, 87 F.3d 872, 880 (7th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1055 , 117 S.Ct. 683 , 136 L.Ed.2d 608 (1997); Tolle v. Carroll Touch, Inc., 23 F.3d 174, 178 (7th Cir.1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tullock v. KMART CORP. EMPLOYEE PENSION PLAN
Accord Starzenski v. City of Elkhart, 87 F.3d 872, 880 (7th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1055 , 117 S.Ct. 683 , 136 L.Ed.2d 608 (1997); Tolle v. Carroll Touch, Inc., 23 F.3d 174, 178 (7th Cir.1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Van M. Hafford v. Larry Seidner, Warden, Lorain Correctional Institution, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
See Hartsel v. Keys, 87 F.3d 795, 799 (6th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1055 , 117 S.Ct. 683 , 136 L.Ed.2d 608 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Benavides v. State
See United States v. Watts, 519 U.S. 148 , 117 S.Ct. 683, 637 , 136 L.Ed.2d 554 (1997) (jury cannot be said to have “necessarily rejected” any facts when it returns general verdict of not guilty); United States v. Powell, 469 U.S. 57, 65 , 105 S.Ct. 471, 476-77 , 83 L.Ed.2d 461 (1984) (defendant may not challenge inconsistent verdicts, even when jury acquits defendant of predicate offense while convicting of compound offense; inconsistency may be result of jury lenity).
cited
Cited "see"
Fox v. Van Oosterum
See Hartsel v. Keys, 87 F.3d 795, 799 (6th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1055 , 117 S.Ct. 683 , 136 L.Ed.2d 608 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Fox v. Van Oosterum
See Hartsel v. Keys, 87 F.3d 795, 799 (6th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1055 , 117 S.Ct. 683 , 136 L.Ed.2d 608 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Van M. Hafford v. Larry Seidner, Warden, Lorain Correctional Institution, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
See Hartsel v. Keys, 87 F.3d 795, 799 (6th Cir.1996), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 683 , 136 L.Ed.2d 608 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Gail E. ABEITA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRANSAMERICA MAILINGS, INC., Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
See Hartsel v. Keys, 87 F.3d 795, 799 (6th Cir.1996), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 683 , 136 L.Ed.2d 608 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Misti A. Kilgore v. Outback Steakhouse Of Florida, Inc.
See Hartsel v. Keys, 87 F.3d 795, 799 (6th Cir.1996), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 683 , 136 L.Ed.2d 608 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Kilgore v. Outback Steakhouse of Florida, Inc.
See Hartsel v. Keys, 87 F.3d 795, 799 (6th Cir.1996), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 683 , 136 L.Ed.2d 608 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Carla D. Frizzell v. Southwest Motor Freight, Matthew Cacace
See Hartsel v. Keys, 87 F.3d 795, 799 (6th Cir.1996), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 683 , 136 L.Ed.2d 608 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sedlack v. Braswell Services Group, Inc.
See Hein v. FDIC, 88 F.3d 210, 224-25 (3d Cir.1996), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 683 , 136 L.Ed.2d 608 (1997). 3 C Sedlack alleged that Braswell violated 29 U.S.C. § 1133 and engaged in unreasonable claims practices by failing to notify him of its reasons for denying his claims.
discussed
Cited "see"
21 Employee Benefits Cas. 2439, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23944q Robert E. Sedlack v. Braswell Services Group, Incorporated, A/K/A Braswell Group Inc., Robert E. Sedlack v. Braswell Services Group, Incorporated, A/K/A Braswell Group Inc.
See Hein v. FDIC, 88 F.3d 210, 224-25 (3d Cir.1996), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 683 , 136 L.Ed.2d 608 (1997). 3 C 16 Sedlack alleged that Braswell violated 29 U.S.C. § 1133 and engaged in unreasonable claims practices by failing to notify him of its reasons for denying his claims.
cited
Cited "see"
Russell v. Gregoire
See United States v. Watts, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 683 , 136 L.Ed.2d 554 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
John Lanigan, Sr. v. Village of East Hazel Crest, Illinois, Officer Robert Wasek, Chief Ray Robertson
See Starzenski v. City of Elkhart, 87 F.3d 872, 879 (7th Cir.1996), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 683 , 136 L.Ed.2d 608 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Freddie Sinkler, Jr.
See, e.g., United States v. Watts, 519 U.S. 148, 156 , 117 S.Ct. 683 , 136 L.Ed.2d 554 (1997) (per curiam) (affirming reliance on acquitted conduct); United States v. Ciavarella, 716 F.3d 705, 736 (3d Cir.2013) (noting that a “court may consider relevant information without regard to its admissibility under the rules of evidence applicable at trial, provided that the information has sufficient indicia of reliability to support its probable accuracy” (quoting U.S.S.G. § 6A1.3 (a))).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lineback v. Spurlino Materials, LLC
(2×)
The court looks to the same *500 factors to which it looks in other contexts when deciding whether to grant injunctive relief: "the lack of an adequate remedy at law, the balance of potential harms posed by the denial or grant of interim relief, the public interest, and the petitioner's likelihood of success on the merits of its complaint." Bloedorn v. Francisco Foods, Inc., 276 F.3d 270, 286 (7th Cir.2001) (citing Kinney v. Pioneer Press, 881 F.2d 485 , 490 & n. 3, 493 (7th Cir.1989)); see also NLRB v. Electro-Voice, Inc., 83 F.3d 1559, 1566 (7th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1055 , 117 S…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Sammye R. Holloway v. Sally Brush Clermont County, Ohio
See, e.g., Hartsel v. Keys, 87 F.3d 795, 799 (6th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1055 , 117 S.Ct. 683 , 136 L.Ed.2d 608 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
North American Specialty Insurance v. Myers ex rel. Estate of Myers
See Wiley, 20 F.3d at 226 (courts cannot consider hearsay when reviewing motion for summary judgment); see also Hartsel v. Keys, 87 F.3d 795, 799 (6th Cir.1996), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 683 , 136 L.Ed.2d 608 (1997)(holding the same); Moore v. Holbrook, 2 F.3d 697, 699 (6th Cir.1993)(noting that Fed.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
North American Specialty Insurance Company v. Shirley Myers
See Wiley, 20 F.3d at 226 (courts cannot consider hearsay when reviewing motion for summary judgment); see also Hartsel v. Keys, 87 F.3d 795, 799 (6th Cir.1996), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 683 , 136 L.Ed.2d 608 (1997)(holding the same); Moore v. Holbrook, 2 F.3d 697, 699 (6th Cir.1993)(noting that Fed.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Boltach
v.
Dexter Township
v.
Dexter Township
No. 96-438.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 6, 1997.
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1)
Ct. App. Mich. Certiorari denied.