green
Positive treatment
6.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State of Tennessee v. Russell Dale Oliver
See, e.g., United States v. Sowa, 34 F.3d 447, 451 (7th Cir. 1994) (holding that once the defendant has proved actual and substantial prejudice, government must provide its reasons for delay, to be balanced against prejudice to determine whether due process has been denied), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1117 , 115 S. Ct. 915 (1995); Howell v. Barker, 904 F.2d 889, 895 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1016 , 111 S. Ct. 590 (1990); but see, e.g., United States v. Crouch, 84 F.3d 1497, 1510-14 (5th Cir. 1996) (rejecting the balancing approach and holding that defendant must show that the prosecution …
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Valdobino-Pineda
See United States v. Crouch, 84 F.3d 1497, 1516 (5th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1076 , 117 S.Ct. 736 , 136 L.Ed.2d 676 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Texas, the State Of v. Condran, Charles Franklin
(2×)
See United States v. Crouch, 84 F.3d 1497 , 1511 n. 13 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), cert. denied, U.S. 117 S. Ct. 736 (1997). , A minority of the circuits balance the reasons for delay against the prejudice suffered.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Condran
(2×)
See United States v. Crouch, 84 F.3d 1497 , 1511 n. 13 (5th Cir.1996) (en banc), cert. denied, _ U.S. __ 117 S.Ct. 736 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. McFarland (Second Concurrence)
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Crouch, 84 F.3d 1497, 1510 (5th Cir. 1996) (‘‘[w]e recognize that neither Marion nor Lovasco is crystal clear on this issue, and each opinion contains some language that can give comfort to either view’’), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1076 , 117 S. Ct. 736 , 136 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. McFarland (Third Concurrence)
See, e.g., United States v. Crouch, 84 F.3d 1497 , 1511–12 (5th Cir. 1996) (citing cases), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1076 , 117 S. Ct. 736 , 136 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. McFarland
See, e.g., United States v. Crouch, 84 F.3d 1497, 1514 (5th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1076 , 117 S. Ct. 736 , 136 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Davis
See, e.g., U.S. v. Crouch, 84 F.3d 1497, 1511-12 (5th Cir.1996), cert. den., 519 U.S. 1076 , 117 S.Ct. 736 , 136 L.Ed.2d 676 (1997) (citing cases and discussing rationale for adopting the legal test endorsed by a majority of the federal circuit courts).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Clark v. State
Id. (citations omitted); see also United States v. Crouch, 84 F.3d 1497 , 1512 n. 13 (5th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1076 , 117 S.Ct. 736 , 136 L.Ed.2d 676 (1997). 16 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Schneider National Carriers, Inc.
v.
Pyatt et ux.
v.
Pyatt et ux.
No. 96-374.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 13, 1997.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.