Fritz v. Champion, 519 U.S. 1119 (1997). · Go Syfert
Fritz v. Champion, 519 U.S. 1119 (1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
Cite instead
Cite for current doctrine: Mosley v. State (1998)
“any allegation of ineffectiveness must be firmly founded in the record and the record must affirmatively demonstrate the alleged ineffectiveness.”
147 citation events (71 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Richard Rodriguez v. State (texapp, 1998-11-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Richard Rodriguez v. State
Tex. App. · 1998 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
any allegation of ineffectiveness must be firmly founded in the record and the record must affirmatively demonstrate the alleged ineffectiveness.
discussed Cited "see" Oklahoma State Board of Examiners of Certified Shorthand Reporters v. Thompson
Okla. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Fritz v. State of Oklahoma, 1991 OK CR 62, ¶ 62 , 811 P.2d 1353 , denial of habeas corpus aff'd, 66 F.3d 338 (10th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 966 , 136 L.Ed.2d 851 (1997) [No due process violation where delay was necessary for collection of evidence.]. .
discussed Cited "see" Escamilla v. State
Tex. Crim. App. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See McFarland v. State, 928 S.W.2d 482, 497-98 (Tex.Cr.App.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 966 , 136 L.Ed.2d 851 (1997) *829 (there is no per se evidence that a juror must view as having definitive mitigating effect).
discussed Cited "see" Escamilla, Licho AKA Hernandez, Francisco Jesus
Tex. Crim. App. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See McFarland v. State , 928 S.W.2d 482, 497-98 (Tex.Cr.App. 1996), cert. denied, 117 S.Ct. 966 (1997) (there is no per se evidence that a juror must view as having definitive mitigating effect).
discussed Cited "see" Escamilla v. State
Tex. Crim. App. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See McFarland v. State, 928 S.W.2d 482, 497-98 (Tex.Cr.App.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 966 , 136 L.Ed.2d 851 (1997) *829 (there is no per se evidence that a juror must view as having definitive mitigating effect).
discussed Cited "see" Melancon v. State (2×)
Tex. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See McFarland v. State, 928 S.W.2d 482, 500 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 966 , 136 L.Ed.2d 851 (1997); Jimenez v. State, 804 S.W.2d 334, 338 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1991, pet. ref'd).
discussed Cited "see" Stephens v. State (2×)
Tex. App. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See McFarland v. State, 928 S.W.2d 482, 500 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 966 , 136 L.Ed.2d 851 (1997); Jimenez v. State, 804 S.W.2d 334, 338 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1991, pet. ref'd).
cited Cited "see" In re S.P.
Tex. App. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See McFarland v. State, 928 S.W.2d 482, 500 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 966 , 136 L.Ed.2d 851 (1997).
cited Cited "see" In Re SP
Tex. App. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See McFarland v. State, 928 S.W.2d 482, 500 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 966 , 136 L.Ed.2d 851 (1997).
discussed Cited "see" Ibarra v. State
Tex. Crim. App. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See McFarland v. State, 928 S.W.2d 482, 507 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), ce rt. denied, 519 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 966 , 136 L.Ed.2d 851 (1997) (identification admissible if ability to identify has origin independent from pre-trial procedure).
cited Cited "see" Ladd v. State
Tex. Crim. App. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See McFarland v. State, 928 S.W.2d 482, 516-517 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cer t. denied, 519 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 966 , 136 L.Ed.2d 851 (1997).
cited Cited "see" Vasquez v. State
Tex. App. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See McFarland v. State, 928 S.W.2d 482, 500 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 966 , 136 L.Ed.2d 851 (1997).
discussed Cited "see" Fain v. State (2×)
Tex. App. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See McFarland v. State, 928 S.W.2d 482, 500 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 966 , 136 L.Ed.2d 851 (1997).
discussed Cited "see" McGinn v. State (2×)
Tex. Crim. App. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See McFarland v. State, 928 S.W.2d 482, 498-99 (Tex.Cr.App.1996), cert.denied, ___ U.S. ___, 117 S.Ct. 966 , 136 L.Ed.2d 851 (1997) (constitutionality of Article 37.071, V.A.C.C.P., is not contingent upon appellate review of the mitigation issue).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Thompson v. State (2×)
Tex. Crim. App. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
Texas Penal Code § 6.04(a), Causation: Conduct and Results, provides A person is criminally responsible if the result would not have occurred but for his conduct, operating either alone or concurrently with another cause, unless the concurrent cause was clearly sufficient to produce the result and the conduct of the actor clearly insufficient. (emphasis added); see also McFarland v. State, 928 S.W.2d 482, 516 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), ce rt. denied, 519 U.S. 1119 , 117 S.Ct. 966 , 136 L.Ed.2d 851 (1997); Felder v. State, 848 S.W.2d 85 , 90 n. 1 (Tex.Crim.App.1992), cer t. denied, 510 U.S. 829 , 11…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fritz
v.
Champion, Warden
No. 96-5999.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 18, 1997.
519 U.S. 1119

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.