green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Hucker v. City of Beaumont
See Tamez v. City of San Marcos, 118 F.3d 1085, 1091 (5th Cir.1997), cert, denied, 522 U.S. 1125 , 118 S.Ct. 1073 , 140 L.Ed.2d 132 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nelson v. Stalder
See Tamez v. City of San Marcos, 118 F.3d 1085, 1092 (5th Cir.1997) (“An official acts within his discretionary authority when he performs nonministerial acts within the boundaries of his official capacity.”), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1125 , 118 S.Ct. 1073 , 140 L.Ed.2d 132 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Casanova v. City of Brookshire
Under the doctrine of qualified immunity, “government officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818-19 , 102 S.Ct. 2727 , 73 L.Ed.2d 396 (1982); see Tamez v. City of San Marcos, 118 F.3d 1085, 1091 (5th Cir.1997), 522 U.S. 1125 , 118 S.Ct. 1073 , 140 L.Ed.2d 132 (1998); Hart, 127 F.3d at 441 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Casanova v. City of Brookshire
Under the doctrine of qualified immunity, "government officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known." Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818-19 , 102 S.Ct. 2727 , 73 L.Ed.2d 396 (1982); see Tamez v. City of San Marcos, 118 F.3d 1085, 1091 (5th Cir.1997), 522 U.S. 1125 , 118 S.Ct. 1073 , 140 L.Ed.2d 132 (1998); Hart, 127 F.3d at 441 .
cited
Cited "see"
Taylor Publishing Co. v. Jostens, Inc.
See Tamez v. City of San Marcos, Texas, 118 F.3d 1085, 1089 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 118 S.Ct. 1073 , 140 L.Ed.2d 132 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Holland Ex Rel. Holland v. City of Houston
Under the doctrine of qualified immunity, “government officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818-19 , 102 S.Ct. 2727 , 73 L.Ed.2d 396 (1982); see Tamez v. City of San Marcos, 118 F.3d 1085, 1091 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1073 , 140 L.Ed.2d 132 (1998); Hart, 127 F.3d at 441 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Bean v. Calderon
See Turk v. White, 116 F.3d 1264, 1267 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1073 , 140 L.Ed.2d 132 (1998); but see Johnson v. Baldwin, 114 F.3d 835, 839-40 (9th Cir.1997) (holding that under the circumstances of that case, an unreasonable failure to investigate and discredit a weak alibi defense was prejudicial ineffective assistance of counsel).
discussed
Cited "see"
98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9096, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,770 Anthony Cornell Bean, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Arthur Calderon, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-Appellee
See Turk v. White, 116 F.3d 1264, 1267 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 1073 , 140 L.Ed.2d 132 (1998); but see Johnson v. Baldwin, 114 F.3d 835, 839-40 (9th Cir.1997) (holding that under the circumstances of that case, an unreasonable failure to investigate and discredit a weak alibi defense was prejudicial ineffective assistance of counsel).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Exide Technologies
See, e.g., Tamez v. City of San Marcos, 118 F.3d 1085, 1098 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied 522 U.S. 1125 , 118 S.Ct. 1073 , 140 L.Ed.2d 132 (1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Randall R. LEWIS
v.
Hershel W. GOBER, Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs
v.
Hershel W. GOBER, Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs
No. 97-7151.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 23, 1998.
Published
Case below, Lewis v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 151; 5 Vet.App. 315; 16 F.3d 419.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.