green
Positive treatment
8.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Tuck Chong
See United States v. Lampley, 127 F.3d 1231, 1245-46 (10th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1137 , 118 S.Ct. 1098 , 140 L.Ed.2d 153 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Victor E. Robbins, Sr., A/K/A Gene, Roy G. Robbins, A/K/A Gordon, and James Herriman
See United States v. Whitaker, 127 F.3d 595, 606 (7th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1137 , 118 S.Ct. 1098 , 140 L.Ed.2d 153 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Garcia
See United States v. Lampley, 127 F.3d 1231, 1242 (10th Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1098 , 140 L.Ed.2d 153 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eddie Lee Williams
See United States v. Cantley, 130 F.3d 1371, 1379 (10th Cir.1997) ("[T]hough we recognize the burden is on the government to prove the substances were crack cocaine, [defendant] has presented no evidence whatsoever to show that the substances were not crack cocaine."), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 1098 , 140 L.Ed.2d 153 (1998). 26 The judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma is AFFIRMED. * This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Williams
See United States v. Cantley, 130 F.3d 1371, 1379 (10th Cir. 1997) (“[T]hough we recognize the burden is on the government to prove the substances were crack cocaine, [defendant] has presented no evidence whatsoever to show -10- that the substances were not crack cocaine.”), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 1098 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sonya Evette Singleton
See United States v. Lampley, 127 F.3d 1231, 1242 (10th Cir.1997), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 118 S.Ct. 1098 , 140 L.Ed.2d 153 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Arturo Brazier, A/K/A Arturo Gooding
See United States v. Cantley, 130 F.3d 1371, 1379 (10th Cir.1997), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 1098 , 140 L.Ed.2d 153 (1998); United States v. Silvers, 84 F.3d 1317, 1327 (10th Cir.1996), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brazier
See United States v. Cantley, 130 F.3d 1371, 1379 (10th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, U.S. , 118 S. Ct. 1098 (1998); United States v. Silvers, 84 F.3d 1317, 1327 (10th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, __ U.S. __ , 117 S. Ct. 742 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Charles COLLINS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.J. KIBORT and Educational Therapy Center, Defendants-Appellants
See United States v. Whitaker, 127 F.3d 595, 601 (7th Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1098 , 140 L.Ed.2d 153 (1998); United States v. Payne, 102 F.3d 289, 294 (7th Cir.1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Walter Knight
See United States v. Lampley, 127 F.3d 1231, 1245-46 (10th Cir.1997), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 1098 , 140 L.Ed.2d 153 (1998). "[S]o long as there is a constitutionally authorized federal nexus, the federal government is free to act anywhere within the United States." Id. at 1246.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Knight
(2×)
See United States v. Lampley, 127 F.3d 1231, 1245-46 (10th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 1098 (1998). “[S]o long as there is a constitutionally authorized federal nexus, the federal government is free to act anywhere within the United States.” Id. at 1246.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Maples
Koshy, Note, The Right of [All] the People to be Secure: Extending Fundamental Fourth Amendment Rights to Probationers and Parolees, 39 Hastings L.J., 449 , 460 (1988) (footnotes omitted).] "Griffin stands for the proposition that reasonableness for probationary [and, presumably also parole] searches may be established by statute, rather than by warrant." United States v. Schoenrock, 868 F.2d 289, 292 (8th Cir.1989); see also United States v. Cantley, 130 F.3d 1371, 1375 (10th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1137 , 118 S.Ct. 1098 , 140 L.Ed. 2d 153 (1998) (warrantless search of parolee's hom…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Frank Roy Marsalla, United States of America v. Letti K. Rivera, Also Known as Letti K. Wright
(2×)
See United States v. Westbrook, 896 F.2d 330, 335 (8th Cir.1990) (two witnesses used substance at issue and had extensive previous use); United States v. Meeks, 857 F.2d 1201, 1204 (8th Cir.1988) (co-conspirators used substance and called it “cocaine”); see also United States v. Cantley, 130 F.3d 1371, 1378-79 (10th Cir.1997) (multiple police officers and lay witnesses who purchased substance from, or sold substance to, defendant testified that substance was “crack”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1098 , 140 L.Ed.2d 153 (1998); United States v. Taylor, 116 F.3d 269, 273-74 (7th C…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Frank Roy Marsalla
See United States v. Westbrook, 896 F.2d 330, 335 (8th Cir. 1990) (two witnesses used substance at issue and had extensive previous use); United States v. Meeks, 857 F.2d 1201, 1204 (8th Cir. 1988) (co-conspirators used substance and called it “cocaine”); see also United States v. Cantley, 130 F.3d 1371, 1378-79 (10th Cir. 1997) (multiple police officers and lay witnesses who purchased substance from, or sold substance to, defendant testified that substance was “crack”), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 1098 (1998); United States v. Taylor, 116 F.3d 269, 273-74 (7th Cir. 1997) (drug supplier, …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jackson
See, e.g., United States v. Cantley, 130 F.3d 1371, 1378-79 (10th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, -11- 118 S. Ct. 1098 (1998); Wright, 16 F.3d at 1439-41 ; United States v. Walters, 904 F.2d 765, 770-71 (1st Cir. 1990); Sanchez DeFundora, 893 F.2d at 1175-76 ; United States v. Paiva, 892 F.2d 148, 156-57 (1st Cir. 1989); United States v. Brown, 887 F.2d 537, 542 (5th Cir. 1989); United States v. Tinsley, 800 F.2d 448, 450 (4th Cir. 1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jay Van Jackson, Iii, AKA Little Jay, United States of America v. Paul Sheldon Cromartie, AKA Shy-Lo AKA Paul Miller
See, e.g., United States v. Cantley, 130 F.3d 1371, 1378-79 (10th Cir.1997), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 1098 , 140 L.Ed.2d 153 (1998); Wright, 16 F.3d at 1439-41 ; United States v. Walters, 904 F.2d 765, 770-71 (1st Cir.1990); Sanchez DeFundora, 893 F.2d at 1175-76 ; United States v. Paiva, 892 F.2d 148, 156-57 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Brown, 887 F.2d 537, 542 (5th Cir.1989); United States v. Tinsley, 800 F.2d 448, 450 (4th Cir.1986). 25 The government relied on the testimony of the three juveniles to establish that Defendants exchanged firearms for crack cocaine.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert W. Schmalzried
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Lampley, 127 F.3d 1231, 1241 (10th Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1098 , 140 L.Ed.2d 153 (1998), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1099 , 140 L.Ed.2d 153 (1998), and cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1201 , 140 L.Ed.2d 330 (1998) (“Essentially, we must determine whether the evidence in the record is sufficient, as to both Mr. Lampley and Mr. Baird, to establish a nexus between the carriage of the gun and the underlying crime of conspiracy.”); In re Hanserd, 123 F.3d 922, 927 (6th Cir.1997) (The court declined to uphold the § 924(c)(1) convicti…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Petersen v. Carbon County
See, e.g., United States v. Cantley, 130 F.3d 1371, 1376 (10th Cir. 1997) (noting that, as defendant had not yet been convicted, state had to set forth additional evidence to show he violated his parole conditions) , cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 1098 (1998); Perry v. United States Parole Comm’n, 831 F.2d 811, 813 (8th Cir. 1987) (Parole Commission may consider dismissed charges as grounds for parole revocation).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Petersen v. Carbon County
See, e.g., United States v. Cantley, 130 F.3d 1371, 1376 (10th Cir.1997) (noting that, as defendant had not yet been convicted, state had to set forth additional evidence to show he violated his parole conditions), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 1098 , 140 L.Ed.2d 153 (1998); Perry v. United States Parole Comm'n, 831 F.2d 811, 813 (8th Cir.1987) (Parole Commission may consider dismissed charges as grounds for parole revocation). 13 Defendants did not violate any clearly established law.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROBERT W. SCHMALZRIED
See, e.g., United States v. Lampley, 127 F.3d 1231, 1241 (10th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 1098 (1998), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 1099 (1998), and cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 1201 (1998) (“Essentially, we must determine whether the evidence in the record is sufficient, as to both Mr. Lampley and Mr. Baird, to establish a nexus between the carriage of the gun and the underlying crime of conspiracy.”); In re Hanserd, 123 F.3d 922, 927 (6th Cir. 1997) (The court declined to uphold the §924(c)(1) conviction where “[t]here was no evidence that Hanserd was engaged in any substantive drug…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sweet
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 97-7466.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 23, 1998.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.