green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gray
(2×)
See Turner v. Marshall, 121 F.3d 1248 , 1254 n. 2 (9th Cir.1997) (contemporary explanation of prosecutor favored), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1153, 118 S.Ct. 1178 , 140 L.Ed.2d 186 (1998); cf. Simmons v. Beyer, 44 F.3d 1160, 1168 (3d Cir.) (record not sufficient without prosecutorial explanation), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 905 , 116 S.Ct. 271 , 133 L.Ed.2d 192 (1995); Cochran v. Herring, 43 F.3d 1404 , 1411 n. 11 (11th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1073 , 116 S.Ct. 776 , 133 L.Ed.2d 728 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Blomkest Fertilizer, Inc. v. Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan, Inc.
See In re Prescription Brand Name Drugs Antitrust Lit., 123 F.3d 599, 613 (7th Cir.1997) (Summary judgment in antitrust case not warranted even if key evidence “susceptible of an innocent interpretation” because record must be viewed in light most favorable to nonmovant), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1178 , 140 L.Ed.2d 186 (1998); Apex Oil Co. v. DiMauro, 822 F.2d 246, 253, 257 (2d Cir.) (choice between reasonable inferences left to the fact-finder at trial), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 997 , 108 S.Ct. 685 , 98 L.Ed.2d 638 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Blomkest Fertilizer, Inc. v. Potash Corporation Of Saskatchewan, Inc.
See In re Prescription Brand Name Drugs Antitrust Lit., 123 F.3d 599, 613 (7th Cir.1997) (Summary judgment in antitrust case not warranted even if key evidence "susceptible of an innocent interpretation" because record must be viewed in light most favorable to nonmovant), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 1178 , 140 L.Ed.2d 186 (1998); Apex Oil Co. v. DiMauro, 822 F.2d 246, 253, 257 (2d Cir.) (choice between reasonable inferences left to the fact-finder at trial), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 997 , 108 S.Ct. 685 , 98 L.Ed.2d 638 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gagliardi v. American Home Products Corp.
See In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litigation, 123 F.3d 599, 607 (7th Cir.1997), cert. denied sub. nom, Abbott Laboratories v. Huggins, — U.S. —, 118 S.Ct. 1178 , 140 L.Ed.2d 186 (1998), and cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
Peterson v. BASF Corp.
See, In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litigation, 123 F.3d 599, 607 (7th Cir.l997)(if one named plaintiff satisfies the jurisdictional minimum, other named plaintiffs and unnamed class members can “piggyback” on that plaintiffs claim, by virtue of Section 1367), cert. denied, sub nom., Abbott Labs. v. Huggins, — U.S. —, 118 S.Ct. 1178 , 140 L.Ed.2d 186 (1998); Stromberg Metal Works, Inc. v. Press Mechanical, Inc., 77 F.3d 928, 931 (7th Cir.1996); Gilmer v. Walt Disney Co., supra at 1009.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilkinson v. Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners
See id. at 863-64 In a subsequent case, Maori v. King County, 126 F.3d 1125 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1178 , 140 L.Ed.2d 186 (1998), the Ninth Circuit stated Dodd held “that the failure of a plaintiff to raise a federal takings claim in state court does not preclude that plaintiff from bringing a subsequent federal takings claim in federal court.” Id. at 1130.
discussed
Cited "see"
Law v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n
See In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litigation, 123 F.3d 599, 616 (7th Cir.1997), cert, denied , — - U.S.-, 118 S. Ct. 1178 , 140 L.Ed.2d 186 (1998) (where conspirator withdraws from conspiracy by announcing withdrawal or reporting conspiracy to authorities, liability for continuing illegal acts of other conspirators ceases); United States v. Andrus, 775 F.2d 825, 850 (7th Cir.1985) (once conspirator withdraws from conspiracy, his liability ceases as to acts committed after his withdrawal by other conspirators); Pope v. Bond, 641 F.Supp. 489, 496 (D.D.C.1986) (under conspiracy …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Abbott Laboratories
v.
Huggins
v.
Huggins
No. 97-775.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 2, 1998.
Connor, Consideration, Took.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice O’Connor and Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.